Health Psychology Review (HPR) is a landmark publication – the first review journal in the important and growing discipline of health psychology. This new international forum, edited by a highly respected team, provides a leading environment for review, theory, and conceptual development. HPR contributes to the advancement of the discipline of health psychology and strengthens its relationship to the field of psychology as a whole, as well as to other related academic and professional arenas. It is essential reading for those engaged in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and associated areas.
HPR is dedicated to theoretical and conceptual work, as well as evaluative, integrative, meta-analytic and systematic reviews and interpretations of substantive issues in the general domain of health psychology. The journal particularly favors theory-based reviews of empirical contributions that afford integrative theoretical formulations of work in a given area of health psychology and reviews of developments that develop connections between areas of research within the general domain of health psychology as well as with other disciplines (ranging from biology to policy-oriented research domains). Papers that consider the cross-cultural and cross-national relevance and appropriateness of theories and key concepts are also welcomed. Articles focusing on methodological issues and problems of design and measurement will be considered if they make a direct and substantial contribution to theory. Brief commentaries addressing progress in specific sub-fields of health psychology, comments that apply to existing theoretical models and approaches, and discussions about previously published articles, can also be considered.
Peer Review Integrity
All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.
Disclaimer
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions.
Journal metrics
Usage
508K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
6.6 (2023) Impact Factor
Q1 Impact Factor Best Quartile
9.1 (2023) 5 year IF
21.3 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
Q1 CiteScore Best Quartile
4.535 (2023) SNIP
3.509 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
15 days avg. from submission to first
decision
100 days avg. from submission to first
post-review decision
16 days avg. from acceptance to online
publication
8% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors
who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication.
However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s
quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it
should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to
support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside
other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its
readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In
addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and
never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year
and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six
months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated
annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of
the following metrics
(find out why).
Usage:
the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users
of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the
nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
Impact Factor*:
the average number of citations received by articles published in the
journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science
Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI),
Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources
Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
Impact Factor Best Quartile*:
the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation
Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
5 Year Impact Factor*:
the average number of citations received by articles in the journal
within a five-year window.
CiteScore (Scopus)†:
the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over
a four-year period.
CiteScore Best Quartile†:
the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1
= 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
SNIP
(Source Normalized Impact per Paper):
the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation
potential in the field.
SJR
(Scimago Journal Rank):
Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the
number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
From submission to first decision:
the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the
journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a
first decision in the last six months.
From submission to first post-review decision:
the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the
journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review.
Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last
six months.
From acceptance to online publication:
the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to
online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published
in the last six months.
Acceptance rate:
articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous
calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
Editors in Chief Geert Crombez - Ghent University, Belgium Falko Sniehotta - University of Heidelberg, Germany
Associate Editors Denise de Ridder - Utrecht University, the Netherlands Angela D. Bryan - University of Colorado, Boulder, USA Keegan Knittle - University of Jyväskylä, Finland Laura König - University of Vienna Gerard Molloy - NUI Galway, Ireland Cecilia Cheng - University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Olga Perski - University of California, San Diego; Tampere University, Finland
Consulting Associate Editor Paul Norman - University of Sheffield, UK
Research Methods and Data Analysis Editorial Board Sam Norton - Kings College London, UK Mike Cheung - National University of Singapore, Singapore Blair T. Johnson - University of Connecticut, USA Antonia Lyons - University of Wellington, New Zealand Gjalt-Jorn Peters - Open University, the Netherlands Rachel Shaw - Aston University, USA
Editorial Board John de Wit - Utrecht University, the Netherlands Thomas Webb - University of Sheffield, UK Gareth Treharne - University of Otago, New Zealand Kate Sweeny - University of California, Riverside, USA James Shepperd - University of Florida, USA Paschal Sheeran - University of North Carolina, USA Ralf Schwarzer - Freie Universtität Berlin, Germany Alex Rothman - University of Minnesota, USA Ryan Rhodes - University of Victoria, Canada Andy Prestwich - University of Leeds, UK Seth M. Noar - University of North Carolina, USA Gerjo Kok -University of Maastricht, The Netherlands Roeline Kuijer -University of Canterbury, New Zealand Aleksandra Luszczynska - University of Colorado, USA & Warsaw School of Social Psychology, Poland Teresa McIntyre -Universidade do Minho, Portugal Craig Murray - Lancaster University, UK Gareth Hollands - University College London, UK Malte Friese - Saarland University, Germany Ben Gardner -University of Surrey, UK Kyra Hamilton - Griffith University, Australia Eamonn Ferguson -University of Nottingham, UK Jennifer Graham-Engeland -The Pennsylvania State University Marieke A. Adriaanse - Leiden University, The Netherlands
Past Editors Joop van der Pligt -University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Suzanne C. Segerstrom - University of Kentucky, USA Rona Moss-Morris - King's College London, UK Updated 15-04-2024
Abstracting and indexing
Health Psychology Review is currently indexed in MEDLINE, E-Lib Bremen, National Center for PTSD (PILOTS Database), NAVER, PsycINFO, PsycTESTS, Scopus and the Social Science Citation Index
Open access
Health Psychology Review is a hybrid open access journal that is part of our Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors, make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110811/Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
![F1000Research. The Health Services Gateway. Accepting multiple article types. Submit now.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112414/JournalAd-F1000-HealthServices.jpg"})