Effectiveness of automated corrective feedback on EFL learners’ writing proficiency and perception

References

• Bai, L., & Hu, G. (2017). In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How do students respond? Educational Psychology, 37(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1223275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. (2022). Exploring the effects of automated tracking of student responses to teacher feedback in draft revision: Evidence from an undergraduate EFL writing course. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1655769
   Google Scholar
• Chong, S.W. (2019). College students’ perception of e-feedback: A grounded theory perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1090–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1572067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated essay scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing, 22, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., & Renandya, W.A. (2020). Exploring the integration of automated feedback among lower-proficiency EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1471083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapels, A. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing (pp. 37–56). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Y.H. (2010). Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: Peers or computer program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 432–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2020). A study of adolescent English learners’ cognitive engagement in writing while using an automated content feedback system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1–2), 26–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2014). Investigating the accuracy of feedback at the pigai linguistic levels: A study with first-year college students in Taiwan. Journal of Language Assessment, 12(3), 345–362.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C.A., Lin, Y.L., & Tsai, P.S. (2020). Assessing foreign language narrative writing through automated writing evaluation: A case for the web-based pigai system. In S.M. Yilan & K. Koruyan (Eds.), ICT-based assessment, methods, and programs in tertiary education (pp. 100–119). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D., & Zhong, S. (2016). L2 vs. L1 use of synonymy: An empirical study of synonym use/acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, S.H. (1999). Learner strategies. Language Teaching, 32(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800013574
   Google Scholar
• Ngo, T.T.N., Chen, H.H.J., & Lai, K.K.W. (2022). The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation in EFL/ESL writing: A three-level meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2096642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping, R.L.S., Verezub, E., Badiozaman, I.F., & Chen, W.S. (2020). Tracing EFL students’ flipped classroom journey in a writing class: Lessons from Malaysia. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(3), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1574597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranalli, J., Link, S., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2017). Automated writing evaluation for formative assessment of second language writing: Investigating the accuracy and usefulness of feedback as part of argument-based validation. Educational Psychology, 37(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1136407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarré, C., Grosbois, M., & Brudermann, C. (2021). Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: Impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 707–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1635164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H.F. (2017). An exploration of asynchronous and synchronous feedback modes in EFL writing. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H.F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601
   Google Scholar
• Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2023). Chinese English learners’ perspectives on automated writing feedback. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2023.26.2.33
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2019). Artificial intelligence-based educational application: A survey of the significance for Chinese education. International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning, 1(4), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMARTTL.2019.106507
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.J., Shang, H.F., & Briody, P. (2013). Exploring the impact of using automated writing evaluation in English as a foreign language university students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 234–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.655300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R.D. (2020). Automated writing evaluation and feedback: Multiple metrics of efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 87–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119830764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z.Y. (2018). Can an automatic essay scoring system be used to improve students’ writing skills? International Journal of English Research, 4(2), 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, D. (2021). Automated writing evaluation for ESL learners: A case study of pigai system. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(3), 949–958. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.3.14.949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., & Litman, D. (2015). Annotation and classification of argumentative writing revisions. Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Denver, Colorado, USA, 133–143.
   Google Scholar