Utilizing technology-enhanced learning in geography: testing student response systems in large lectures

References

• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longmand.
   Google Scholar
• Bojinova, E., & Oigara, J. (2013). Teaching and learning with clickers in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(2), 154–165.
   Google Scholar
• Burnstein, R. A., & Lederman, L. M. (2001). Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. The Physics Teacher, 39(1), 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Science Education, 6(1), 9–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Compton, M., & Allen, J. (2018). Student response systems: A rationale for their use and a comparison of some cloud based tools. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 11, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B. R., & Babon, A. (2017). Active learning through online quizzes: Better learning and less (busy) work. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBourgh, G. A. (2008). Use of classroom “clickers” to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(2), 76–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draper, S., & Brown, M. I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system: Interactivity in lectures using electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, S., Cargill, J., & Cutts, Q. (2002). Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 18, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, P. M., Palmer, E., & Devitt, P. (2007). Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: A randomised trial. BMC Medical Education, 7, 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HEFCE. (2005). HEFCE strategy for e-learning (1–19), Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE. (2008). Review of the 2005 HEFCE strategy for e-Learning (1–47), Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, G., Mayo, J., Peacey, M., & Richardson, M. (2018). Class size at university. Fiscal Studies, 39(2), 241–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Henderson, D., & Sealover, P. (2009). “Clickers” in the classroom. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 4(1), 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, S. O., & Robinson, C. L. (2009). ‘Pretty lights’ and maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems. Computers & Education, 53(1), 189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, M. E. (2010). The use of ‘Clickers’ in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 556–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, K. A., & Ritter, M. E. (2000). Virtual geographies and the use of the internet for learning and teaching geography in higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(1), 87–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, C. (2016). Mentimeter smartphone student response system: A class above clickers. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 9, 13.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, J. R., & Jones, L. L. (2008). A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 187–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., … Zhang, H. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monks, J., & Schmidt, R. M. (2011). The impact of class size on outcomes in higher education. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(1–17).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: Challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratton, J., & Hales, L. W. (2015). The effects of active participation on student learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 79, 210–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revell, A., & Wainwright, E. (2009). What makes lectures “unmissable”? Insights into teaching excellence and active learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, J. (2018). A brief review of Mentimeter – A student response system. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 1(1), 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, P., Twidle, J., Childs, A., & Godwin, J. (2007). The use of the internet in science teaching: A longitudinal study of developments in use by student- teachers in England. International Journal of Science Education, 29(13), 1605–1627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. E. L., & Kerr, S. E. (2018). Students’ perceptions of clickers for enhancing student engagement and academic achievement. Prairie Perspectives Geographical Essays, 20, 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Steinert, Y., & Snell, L. S. (1999). Interactive lecturing: Strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., Brown, C., & Griffin, D. K. (2008). Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: An empirical comparison of three delivery styles. Computers and Education, 50(3), 640–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, S. A. J., Brown, M. I., & Draper, S. (2004). Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: One practitioner’s application: Electronic voting system in logic lectures. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, M. (2008). Effective online interaction: Mapping course design to bridge from research to practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 52–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormey, R., & Henchy, D. (2008). Re-imagining the traditional lecture: An action research approach to teaching student teachers to ‘Do’ philosophy. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), 303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universities UK. (2018). Patterns and trends in UK higher education 2018 (pp. 39), .London
   Google Scholar
• White, G. (2011). Interactive lecturing. The Clinical Teacher, 8(4), 230–235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar