Priority setting in higher education research using a mixed methods approach

References

• Ajjawi, R., Barton, K., Dennis, A., & Rees, C. (2017). Developing a national dental education research strategy: Priorities, barriers and enablers. BMJ Open, 7(3), e013129. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, M., Hodges, B., & Regehr, G. (2007). Research in medical education: Balancing service and science. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9026-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amigud, A., Arnedo-Moreno, J., Daradoumis, T., & Guerrero-Roldan, A. (2017). Using learning analytics for preserving academic integrity. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, T., & Allan, D. (2017). The invisible impact of educational research. Oxford Review of Education, 43(6), 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1316252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, D., Miller, W., & Kneale, P. (2018). The Cinderella of academia: Is higher education pedagogic research undervalued in UK research assessment? Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1625–1636. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1276549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechartres, A., & Ravaud, P. (2015). Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste. BMC Medicine, 13(244). https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-015-0492-3
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A., Cleland, J., Johnston, P., Ker, J., Lough, M., & Rees, C. (2014). Exploring stakeholders’ views of medical education research priorities: A national survey. Medical Education, 48(11), 1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit, H., & Altbach, P. (2020). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898
   Google Scholar
• De Wit, H., Hunter, F., & Howard, L. (Eds). (2015). Internationalisation of higher education. EU.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, R., Dadaczynski, K., Okan, O., McCaffery, K., & Pickles, K. (2021). Psychological wellbeing and academic experience of university students in Australia during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geschwind, L., & Broström, A. (2015). Managing the teaching–research nexus: Ideals and practice in research-oriented universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, B., Albert, M., Arweiler, D., Akseer, S., Bandiera, G., Byrne, N., Charlin, B., Karazivan, P., Kuper, A., & Maniate, J. (2011). The future of medical education: A Canadian environmental scan. Medical Education, 45(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03737.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, B., Gupta, J., Bilics, A., & Taff, S. (2018). Balancing efficacy and effectiveness with philosophy, history, and theory-building in occupational therapy education research. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1347
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A. (2002). Pedagogic research at Brookes: Achievements, opportunities and questions. Teaching Forum, 50, 3–6 https://www.academia.edu/27359682/Pedagogic_Research_at_Brookes_Achievements_Opportunities_and_Questions.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, K., Mazzoli Smith, L., & Todd, L. (2018). The impact agenda and critical social research in education: Hitting the target but missing the spot? Policy Futures in Education, 16(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317742214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, A., McLinden, M., & Greenway, C. (2021). Rising to the pedagogical challenges of the fourth industrial Age in the university of the future: An integrated model of scholarship. Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1866440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, D., Stafinski, T., & Martin, D. (2007). Priority-setting for healthcare: Who, how, and is it fair? Health Policy, 84(2-3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitton, C., & Donaldson, C. (2004). Health care priority setting: Principles, practice and challenges. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 2(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-2-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mutton, T. (2020). N and COVID-19: Responses and opportunities for new pedagogical initiatives. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 439–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1805189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Youth Mental Health Foundation Ltd. (2020). Insights: youth mental health and wellbeing over time. Headspace National Youth Mental Health Survey 2020. Headspace. Retrieved 3 May from https://headspace.org.au/assets/Uploads/Insights-youth-mental-health-and-wellbeing-over-time-headspace-National-Youth-Mental-Health-Survey-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D., Luebcke, M., Schmidt, P., Ebner, M., Wannemacher, K., Ebner, M., & Dohmen, D. (2020). A university landscape for the digital world (pp. 1–4). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, C., King, O., Brock, T., Brown, T., Crampton, P., Hall, H., Macaulay, J., Morphet, J., Mundy, M., Oliaro, L., Paynter, S., Williams, B., Wright, C., & Rees, C. (2019). Setting priorities for health education research: A mixed methods study. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1612520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsted, C., Hodges, B., & Scherpbier, A. (2011). ‘The research compass’: An introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 56. Medical Teacher, 33(9), 695–709. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.595436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & B. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 187–208). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sibbald, S., Singer, P., Upshur, R., & Martin, D. (2009). Priority setting: What constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting. BMC Health Services Research, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singer, P., & Mapa, J. (1998). Ethics of resource allocation. dimensions for healthcare executives. Hospital Quarterly, 1(4), 29. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq..16567
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M., Chopra, M., Hoosain, N., & Rudan, I. (2011). A review of selected research priority setting processes at national level in low and middle income countries: Towards fair and legitimate priority setting. Health Research Policy and Systems, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-9-19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vidal, J., & Ferreira, C. (2020). Universities under pressure: The impact of International university rankings. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, T., Weller, J., McKimm, J., O'connor, B., Pinnock, R., Poole, P., … Wearn, A. (2010). Programmatic research in medical education: A national collaboration. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 123, 1318.
   Google Scholar
• Yau, S., Babovič, M., Liu, G., Gugel, A., & Monrouxe, L. (2021). Differing viewpoints around healthcare professions’ education research priorities: A Q-methodology approach. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 3, 975–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10030-5
   Google Scholar