Professionals’ and parents’ shared learning in blended learning networks related to communication and augmentative and alternative communication for people with severe disabilities

References

• The Act concerning Support and Service for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments (LSS) (SFS 1993:387) [Lagen om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade].
   Google Scholar
• Banat, D., S. Summers, and T. Pring. 2002. “An Investigation into Carers' Perceptions of the Verbal Comprehension Ability of Adults with Severe Learning Disabilities.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 30 (2): 78–81.10.1046/j.1468-3156.2001.00148.x
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., and P. Mirenda. 2005. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., D. West, and T. A. Iacono. 2003. “PICTURE IT: An Evaluation of a Training Program for Carers of Adults with Severe and Multiple Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Developmental Disability 28 (3): 260–282.10.1080/1366825031000150964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin, J., and P. Lindstrand. 2003. “What about ICT in Special Education? Special Educators Evaluate Information and Communication Technology as a Learning Tool.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 18 (1): 71–87.10.1080/0885625032000042320
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., M. D. Klein, and M. Haney. 2007. “Promoting Interactions with Infants Who Have Complex Multiple Disabilities: Development and Field Testing of the PLAI Curriculum.” Infants and Young Children 20 (2): 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbart, J., and J. Marshall. 2004. “‘Pushes and Pulls’ on the Parents of Children Who Use AAC.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 20 (4): 194–208.10.1080/07434610400010960
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., J. Wilder, and L. Almqvist. 2013. “Persons with Severe Disabilities.” In Handbook of Positive Psychology and Disability, edited by M. Wehmeyer, 452–473. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N., K. Bunning, J. Porter, and C. Olsson. 1999. “See What I Mean: Interpreting the Meaning of Communication by People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 12 (3): 190–203.10.1111/(ISSN)1468-3148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, E., L. Magnusson, and E. Sennemark. 2011. “Blended Learning Networks Supported by Information and Communication Technology: An Intervention for Knowledge Transformation within Family Care of Older People.” The Gerontologist 51 (4): 561–570.10.1093/geront/gnr015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostyn, I., and B. Maes. 2009. “Interaction between Persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities and Their Partners: A Literature Review.” Journal of Intellectual Developmental Disability 34 (4): 296–312.10.3109/13668250903285648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, D. 2007. “Parents, Families, and Partnerships: Issues and Considerations.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 54 (3): 339–349.10.1080/10349120701488855
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., and D. McNaughton. 2012. “Supporting the Communication, Language, and Literacy Development of Children with Complex Communication Needs: State of the Science and Future Research Priorities.” Assistive Technology 24 (1): 34–44.10.1080/10400435.2011.648717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J., and J. Goldbart. 2008. “‘Communication is Everything I Think.’ Parenting a Child Who Needs Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC).” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 43 (1): 77–98.10.1080/13682820701267444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis, an Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nakken, H., and C. Vlaskamp. 2007. “A Need for a Taxonomy for Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 4 (2): 83–87.10.1111/ppi.2007.4.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Nilholm, C. 2005. “Specialpedagogik: Vilka är De Grundläggande Perspektiven?” [Special Education: What Are the Basic Perspectives?] Pedagogisk Forskning I Sverige 10 (2): 124–138.
   Google Scholar
• Östlund, D. 2012. “The Contextual Conditions of Participation: The Pedagogical Practice of Five Special School Classes.” [Deltagandets Kontextuella Villkor: Fem Träningsskoleklassers Pedagogiska Praktik.] Doctoral Thesis, Malmö Studies in Educational Sciences No. 67, Malmö högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, B. 2003. “Exclusive and Inclusive Discourses in Special Education Research and Policy in Sweden.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 7 (3): 271–280.10.1080/1360311032000108885
   Google Scholar
• Sennemark, E. 2010. Blandade Lärande Nätverk – Ett Verktyg För Kunskaps- Och Erfarenhetsutbyte [Blended Learning Networks – A Tool for Knowledge and Experience Exchange]. Vällingby: Swedish Institute for Assistive Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Tangen, R. 2008. “Listening to Children’s Voices in Educational Research: Some Theoretical and Methodological Problems.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 23 (2): 157–166.10.1080/08856250801945956
   Google Scholar
• Tolson, D., S. Irene, J. Booth, T. Kelly, and L. James. 2006. “Constructing a New Approach to Developing Evidence-Based Practice with Nurses and Older People.” Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing 3 (2): 62–72.10.1111/wvn.2006.3.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolson, D., I. Schofield, J. Booth, and B. K. Timothy. 2007. “Partnerships in Best Practice: Advancing Gerontological Care in Scotland.” In User Participation in Health and Social Care Research, edited by M. Nolan, E. Hanson, G. Grant, and J. Keady, 33–49. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vicsek, L. 2007. “A Scheme for Analyzing the Results of Focus Groups.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 6 (4): 20–34.
   Google Scholar
• White, N., and R. P. Hastings. 2004. “Social and Professional Support for Parents of Adolescents with Severe Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 17 (3): 181–190.10.1111/jar.2004.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V. 2010. Fokusgrupper: Om Fokuserade Gruppintervjuer Som Undersökningsmetod [Focus Groups: Focused Group Interviews as Method]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, J. 2008. “Video Observations of Dyadic Interaction: Behaviour Style of Presymbolic Children.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 10 (2): 104–124.10.1080/15017410801900390
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, J. 2014. Kommunikation Hos Och Med Barn Och Ungdomar Med Flerfunktionsnedsättningar: En Systematisk Kunskapsöversikt [Communication of and with Children and Young People with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities: A Systematic Literature Review]. Kalmar: Swedish National Family Care and Competence Center 2014:1.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, J., and M. Granlund. 2003. “Behaviour Style and Interaction between Seven Children with Multiple Disabilities and Their Caregivers.” Child: Care, Health and Development 29 (6): 559–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, J., and M. Granlund. 2015. “Stability and Change in Sustainability of Daily Routines and Social Networks in Families of Children with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 28 (2): 133–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar