11,009
Views
109
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (26)

Juan Fischer, Margaret Bearman, David Boud & Joanna Tai. (2024) How does assessment drive learning? A focus on students’ development of evaluative judgement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 49:2, pages 233-245.
Read now
Lanlan Li, Kun Wang & Jiliang Chen. (2024) Effects of learner factors on the scorer reliability of self- and peer-assessment of Chinese college students’ EFL writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 0:0, pages 1-15.
Read now
Mo Li, Shulin Yu, Pauline Mak & Chunhong Liu. (2023) Exploring the efficacy of peer assessment in university translation classrooms. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:4, pages 585-609.
Read now
Xiuyan Guo, Jin Liu, Hengtao Tang, Ruiqin Gao, Qu Chen, Terry Wolfer & Aisha Haynes. (2023) Development and validation of the peer assessment motivation scale (PAMS) in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 48:8, pages 1243-1257.
Read now
Javier Fernández Ruiz & Ernesto Panadero. (2023) Assessment professional development courses for university teachers: a nationwide analysis exploring length, evaluation and content. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48:4, pages 485-501.
Read now
Chunping Zheng, Lili Wang & Ching Sing Chai. (2023) Self-assessment first or peer-assessment first: effects of video-based formative practice on learners’ English public speaking anxiety and performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:4, pages 806-839.
Read now
William E. Donald & Neil Ford. (2023) Fostering social mobility and employability: the case for peer learning. Teaching in Higher Education 28:3, pages 672-678.
Read now
Judy Parr & Eleanor Hawe. (2022) Student pedagogic voice in the literacy classroom: a review. Research Papers in Education 37:6, pages 773-796.
Read now
Zheng Zong, Christian Schunn & Yanqing Wang. (2022) What makes students contribute more peer feedback? The role of within-course experience with peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:6, pages 972-983.
Read now
Juan Ramón Rico-Juan, Cristina Cachero & Hermenegilda Macià. (2022) Influence of individual versus collaborative peer assessment on score accuracy and learning outcomes in higher education: an empirical study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:4, pages 570-587.
Read now
Cedomir Gladovic, Joanna Hong-Meng Tai & Phillip Dawson. (2022) Qualitative approaches to researching evaluative judgement in pedagogical activities: a case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:2, pages 231-244.
Read now
Diana Pereira, Irene Cadime, Maria Assunção Flores, Cláudia Pinheiro & Patrícia Santos. (2022) Investigating the Effect of the Programme of Study on University Students’ Perceptions about Assessment. Educational Assessment 27:1, pages 71-92.
Read now
Eva Lopes Fernandes & Maria Assunção Flores. (2022) Assessment in higher education: voices of programme directors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:1, pages 45-60.
Read now
Zheng Zong, Christian D. Schunn & Yanqing Wang. (2021) Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46:6, pages 973-992.
Read now
Megan Biango-Daniels & Mark Sarvary. (2021) A challenge in teaching scientific communication: academic experience does not improve undergraduates’ ability to assess their or their peers’ writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46:5, pages 809-820.
Read now
Jiming Zhou, Yongyan Zheng & Joanna Hong-Meng Tai. (2020) Grudges and gratitude: the social-affective impacts of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:3, pages 345-358.
Read now
Dennis Alonzo, Negin Mirriahi & Chris Davison. (2019) The standards for academics’ standards-based assessment practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:4, pages 636-652.
Read now
Phillip Dawson, Michael Henderson, Paige Mahoney, Michael Phillips, Tracii Ryan, David Boud & Elizabeth Molloy. (2019) What makes for effective feedback: staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:1, pages 25-36.
Read now
Chie Adachi, Joanna Tai & Phillip Dawson. (2018) A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment. Higher Education Research & Development 37:3, pages 453-467.
Read now
Cedomir Gladovic, Joanna Hong-Meng Tai, Kelli Nicola-Richmond & Phillip Dawson. How can learners practice evaluative judgement using qualitative self-assessment?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 0:0, pages 1-12.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (83)

Jia-Hua Zhao, Zeng-Wen Chen & Qi-Fan Yang. (2024) I do and I understand: A virtual reality-supported collaborative design-assessing activity for EFL students. System 121, pages 103213.
Crossref
Christian Köppe, Roald P. Verhoeff & Wouter van Joolingen. (2024) Elements for understanding and fostering self-assessment of learning artifacts in higher education. Frontiers in Education 9.
Crossref
Tomás Alves, Francisco Sousa, Sandra Gama, Joaquim Jorge & Daniel Gonçalves. (2023) How Personality Traits Affect Peer Assessment in Distance Learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 29:1, pages 371-396.
Crossref
Sergio Santander-Jiménez, Miguel A. Vega-Rodríguez, José M. Granado-Criado, Álvaro Rubio-Largo, Juan A. Gómez-Pulido, César Gómez-Martín & Arturo Durán-Domínguez. (2023) Offline and online peer assessment in computer engineering: Insights from a 5-year experience. Education and Information Technologies 29:4, pages 4591-4610.
Crossref
William E. Donald. 2024. Strategic Opportunities for Bridging the University-Employer Divide. Strategic Opportunities for Bridging the University-Employer Divide 203 233 .
David Baidoo-Anu, Daniel Asamoah & Aaron Adusei. (2023) Teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards students’ self assessment: A latent profile analysis. International Journal of Educational Research Open 5, pages 100275.
Crossref
Zheng Zong, Christian D. Schunn & Yanqing Wang. (2023) When do students provide more peer feedback? The roles of performance and prior feedback experiences. Instructional Science 51:6, pages 977-1003.
Crossref
Thomas Howard Morris, Michael Schön & Michael Charles Drayson. (2023) Reimagining online teacher education: combining self-directed learning with peer feedback for interaction and engagement. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning.
Crossref
Si Qi Yoong, Wenru Wang, Alvin Chuen Wei Seah & Hui Zhang. (2023) The quality of verbal feedback given by nursing near-peer tutors: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today 130, pages 105944.
Crossref
Sharad Singh, Akhilesh Barve, Saket Shanker & Hritika Sharma. (2023) Confronting Barriers: An Efficacious Higher Education System Implementation in India. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 14:5, pages 1961-1980.
Crossref
Fu-Yun Yu, Yu-Hsin Liu & Kristine Liu. (2023) Online peer-assessment quality control: A proactive measure, validation study, and sensitivity analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation 78, pages 101279.
Crossref
Zheng Zong & Christian D. Schunn. (2023) Does matching peers at finer-grained levels of prior performance enhance gains in task performance from peer review?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 18:3, pages 425-456.
Crossref
Tribhuwan Kumar, Seyyed Mohammad Ali Soozandehfar, Arash Hashemifardnia & Rasoul Mombeini. (2023) Self vs. peer assessment activities in EFL-speaking classes: impacts on students’ self-regulated learning, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Language Testing in Asia 13:1.
Crossref
Shane McIver & Berni Murphy. (2021) Self-assessment and what happens over time: Student and staff perspectives, expectations and outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education 24:2, pages 207-219.
Crossref
Marie Yeo. (2023) Peer Review Circles: The Value of Working in Triadic Groups and Oral Observational Peer Feedback in the Development of Student Feedback Literacy. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 46:2, pages 270-288.
Crossref
Deborah Tyndall & Shannon Baker Powell. (2023) Good critical friends are hard to find: promoting peer review among doctoral students. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 14:2, pages 186-200.
Crossref
YiBiao Yang, Huanwu Sun, Zhen Dai, Min Wu & Simei Fu. (2023) Comprehensive evaluation of majors offered by universities based on combination weighting. Evaluation and Program Planning 97, pages 102202.
Crossref
Amelia K. Sofjan, Kimberly A. Nguyen, Dhara Surati & Carine Marette. (2023) Assessment of the validity of peer scores and peer feedback in an online peer assessment platform (Kritik). Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 15:4, pages 400-407.
Crossref
Zeng Xiaomeng & Latha Ravindran. (2023) USING TEACHER-STUDENT COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT TO DEVELOP CHINESE EFL LEARNERS’ WRITING. Journal of Language and Communication 10:1, pages 79-100.
Crossref
Cristina Cachero, Juan Ramón Rico-Juan & Hermenegilda Macià. (2023) Influence of personality and modality on peer assessment evaluation perceptions using Machine Learning techniques. Expert Systems with Applications 213, pages 119150.
Crossref
Yupeng Lin & Zhonggen Yu. (2023) A Bibliometric Analysis of Peer Assessment in Online Language Courses. Languages 8:1, pages 47.
Crossref
Laia Lluch Molins & Elena Cano Garcia. (2023) How to Embed SRL in Online Learning Settings? Design Through Learning Analytics and Personalized Learning Design in Moodle. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 12:1, pages 120.
Crossref
Anna Bertram & Carmen Tomas. (2023) Evaluative judgement – a practitioner's case in chemistry research projects. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 24:1, pages 312-326.
Crossref
David Martínez-Maireles, Davide Capperucci & Mila Naranjo Llanos. (2023) Contextual Contrast of Assessment Practices in Catalonia and Tuscany. CADMO:2, pages 33-54.
Crossref
芳 刘. (2023) An Analysis of the Effects of Peer Evaluation on Students’ Psychology in English Writing. Advances in Psychology 13:12, pages 6180-6184.
Crossref
Tiffany Gunning, Chie Adachi & Joanna Tai. 2023. Technology-Enhanced Learning and the Virtual University. Technology-Enhanced Learning and the Virtual University 353 373 .
Tiffany Gunning, Chie Adachi & Joanna Tai. 2023. Technology-Enhanced Learning and the Virtual University. Technology-Enhanced Learning and the Virtual University 1 21 .
José Carlos G. Ocampo & Ernesto Panadero. 2023. The Power of Peer Learning. The Power of Peer Learning 165 182 .
Natasha Dmoshinskaia & Hannie Gijlers. 2023. The Power of Peer Learning. The Power of Peer Learning 289 304 .
Eleonora Concina. (2022) The Relationship between Self- and Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Trends in Higher Education 1:1, pages 41-55.
Crossref
Tiffany K. Gunning, Xavier A. Conlan, Paul K. Collins, Alecia Bellgrove, Kaja Antlej, Adam P. A. Cardilini & Catherine L. Fraser. (2022) Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 19:1.
Crossref
Kerstin Göbel, Julia Bönte, Andreas Gösch & Katharina Neuber. (2022) The relevance of collegial video-based reflection on teaching for the development of reflection-related attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education 120, pages 103878.
Crossref
Armağan Karahanoğlu. (2021) Act like a user, work like a teacher: evaluation of experience design works through peer-testing. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 32:5, pages 2827-2852.
Crossref
Yancai Wang. (2022) Analysis on the Particularity of Higher Education Subject Development under the Background of Artificial Intelligence. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems 2022, pages 1-13.
Crossref
Florence Van Meenen, Liesje Coertjens, Marie-Claire Van Nes & Franck Verschuren. (2022) Peer overmarking and insufficient diagnosticity: the impact of the rating method for peer assessment. Advances in Health Sciences Education 27:4, pages 1049-1066.
Crossref
Shane McIver, Berni Murphy, Lizzie Curran & Ange Parrish. (2022) Cultural proficiency starts here: Drawing on staff and student perceptions to Indigenise curricula. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 33:S1, pages 67-75.
Crossref
Mahyudin Ritonga, Khalil Tazik, Abdulfattah Omar & Elham Saberi Dehkordi. (2022) Assessment and language improvement: the effect of peer assessment (PA) on reading comprehension, reading motivation, and vocabulary learning among EFL learners. Language Testing in Asia 12:1.
Crossref
Roksana Jahan Tumpa, Samer Skaik, Miriam Ham & Ghulam Chaudhry. (2022) Authentic Design and Administration of Group-Based Assessments to Improve the Job-Readiness of Project Management Graduates. Sustainability 14:15, pages 9679.
Crossref
Roksana Jahan Tumpa, Samer Skaik, Miriam Ham & Ghulam Chaudhry. (2022) A Holistic Overview of Studies to Improve Group-Based Assessments in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 14:15, pages 9638.
Crossref
Shengkai Yin, Fang Chen & Hui Chang. (2022) Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Tsai-Yen Li & I-Sheng Lin. 2022. Research Anthology on Makerspaces and 3D Printing in Education. Research Anthology on Makerspaces and 3D Printing in Education 165 188 .
Joni Tornwall, Melinda McGaughy & Carolyn Schubert. (2022) Peer Review. Nurse Educator 47:2, pages 114-119.
Crossref
Kai Presler-Marshall, Sarah Heckman & Kathryn T. Stolee. (2022) Identifying Struggling Teams in Software Engineering Courses Through Weekly Surveys. Identifying Struggling Teams in Software Engineering Courses Through Weekly Surveys.
Eleni Meletiadou & Dina Tsagari. (2022) Exploring EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of the Use of Peer Assessment in External Exam-Dominated Writing Classes. Languages 7:1, pages 16.
Crossref
Gema Fitriady, Siti Nurrochmah, Dona Sandy Yudasmara & Norlena Salamuddin. 2022. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sports Science and Health (ICSSH 2022). Proceedings of the International Conference on Sports Science and Health (ICSSH 2022) 393 398 .
A. De Brún, L. Rogers, A. Drury & B. Gilmore. (2022) Evaluation of a formative peer assessment in research methods teaching using an online platform: A mixed methods pre-post study. Nurse Education Today 108, pages 105166.
Crossref
Misty So-Sum Wai-Cook. 2022. Student Support Services. Student Support Services 145 166 .
Johana Morales, Vicente Morales, Sussy Bayona & Marjorie Morales. 2022. Advances and Applications in Computer Science, Electronics, and Industrial Engineering. Advances and Applications in Computer Science, Electronics, and Industrial Engineering 143 157 .
Krishan Kumar, Alanieta Lesuma-Fatiaki, Niko Namositava, Ethelwyn Varea, Mohammed Juned Hussein & Javed Yusuf. (2021) Planning and Design of Online Peer Assessment Professional Development Training in Higher Education. Planning and Design of Online Peer Assessment Professional Development Training in Higher Education.
Jeongsoon Joh & Lia Plakans. (2021) Peer assessment in EFL teacher preparation: A longitudinal study of student perception. Language Teaching Research, pages 136216882110607.
Crossref
Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, Anna Musioł-Urbańczyk, Marzena Podgórska & Maciej Wolny. (2021) Does motivation matter in evaluation of research institutions? Evidence from Polish public universities. Technology in Society 67, pages 101782.
Crossref
Hui-Chen Lin, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Shao-Chen Chang & Yaw-Don Hsu. (2021) Facilitating critical thinking in decision making-based professional training: An online interactive peer-review approach in a flipped learning context. Computers & Education 173, pages 104266.
Crossref
Qi Lu, Xinhua Zhu & Choo Mui Cheong. (2021) Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement. Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Crossref
Mai Yokoyama & Kazuhisa Miwa. (2021) A Class Practice Study of Intervention Effect of Interactive Assessment on Learning Goal Orientation. Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Crossref
Eleni Meletiadou. (2021) Opening Pandora’s Box: How Does Peer Assessment Affect EFL Students’ Writing Quality?. Languages 6:3, pages 115.
Crossref
Irina Karpovich, Oksana Sheredekina, Tatyana Krepkaia & Larisa Voronova. (2021) The Use of Monologue Speaking Tasks to Improve First-Year Students’ English-Speaking Skills. Education Sciences 11:6, pages 298.
Crossref
Sawsen Lakhal & Hager Khechine. (2021) Technological factors of students’ persistence in online courses in higher education: The moderating role of gender, age and prior online course experience. Education and Information Technologies 26:3, pages 3347-3373.
Crossref
Juan Jose Serrano-Aguilera, Alicia Tocino, Sergio Fortes, Cristian Martín, Pere Mercadé-Melé, Rafael Moreno-Sáez, Antonio Muñoz, Sara Palomo-Hierro & Antoni Torres. (2021) Using Peer Review for Student Performance Enhancement: Experiences in a Multidisciplinary Higher Education Setting. Education Sciences 11:2, pages 71.
Crossref
G. Naveh & D. Bykhovsky. (2021) Online Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Course. IEEE Transactions on Education 64:1, pages 58-65.
Crossref
Gulgun Afacan Adanır. 2021. Handbook of Research on Determining the Reliability of Online Assessment and Distance Learning. Handbook of Research on Determining the Reliability of Online Assessment and Distance Learning 24 42 .
Hanan Saca-Hazboun, Amal Abu-Nijmeh & Etaf Maqboul. (2021) Nursing Students' Perceptions of Peer Evaluation in Group Work at Bethlehem University, Palestine. Bethlehem University Journal 38.
Crossref
Misty So-Sum Wai-Cook. 2021. Student Support Services. Student Support Services 1 23 .
Krishan Kumar, Bibhya Sharma, Gavin Jahir Khan, Salsabil Nusair & Krishna Raghuwaiya. (2020) An exploration on effectiveness of anonymous peer assessment strategy in online formative assessments. An exploration on effectiveness of anonymous peer assessment strategy in online formative assessments.
María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano, Cristina del Campo, Elena Urquía-Grande, David Pascual-Ezama, Murat Akpinar & Carlos Rivero. (2020) Solving the mystery about the factors conditioning higher education students' assessment: Finland versus Spain. Education + Training 62:6, pages 617-630.
Crossref
Alberto Sánchez González. (2020) Peer-review to promote learning and collaboration between students of “Energy in Buildings” = Evaluación por pares para incentivar el aprendizaje y colaboración entre estudiantes de “Energía en la Edificación”. Advances in Building Education 4:1, pages 9.
Crossref
Raúl Tárraga Mínguez, Pilar Sanz Cervera, Amparo Tijeras Iborra & Jordi Cano Fernández. (2020) Evaluación entre iguales a través de blogs en formación de maestros. Valoraciones de los estudiantes. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation 6:1, pages 26-33.
Crossref
Megan Podsiad & Byron Havard. (2020) Faculty acceptance of the peer assessment collaboration evaluation tool: a quantitative study. Educational Technology Research and Development 68:3, pages 1381-1407.
Crossref
Bin Shen, Barry Bai & Weihe Xue. (2020) The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation 64, pages 100821.
Crossref
Higinio Mora, María Teresa Signes-Pont, Andrés Fuster-Guilló & María L. Pertegal-Felices. (2020) A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior 103, pages 140-150.
Crossref
Joanna Tai & Chie Adachi. 2020. Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World 213 227 .
Linda Corrin & Aneesha Bakharia. 2020. Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World 197 212 .
Julián Chaparro-Peláez, Santiago Iglesias-Pradas, Francisco J. Rodríguez-Sedano & Emiliano Acquila-Natale. (2019) Extraction, Processing and Visualization of Peer Assessment Data in Moodle. Applied Sciences 10:1, pages 163.
Crossref
Krishan Kumar, Bibhya Nand Sharma, Salsabil Nusair & Gavin Jahir Khan. (2019) Anonymous online peer assessment in an undergraduate course: An analysis of Students’ perceptions and attitudes in the South Pacific. Anonymous online peer assessment in an undergraduate course: An analysis of Students’ perceptions and attitudes in the South Pacific.
Emiliano Acquila-Natale, Santiago Iglesias-Pradas, Ángel Hernández-García, Julián Chaparro-Peláez & Isabel Rodríguez-Ruiz. (2019) MWDEX. MWDEX.
Jun Na & Yuan Liu. (2019) A quantitative revision method to improve usability of self-and peer assessment in MOOCs. A quantitative revision method to improve usability of self-and peer assessment in MOOCs.
Lin Norton. 2019. Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. Innovative Assessment in Higher Education 111 120 .
Vural Tünkler. (2019) Akran Değerlendirmenin Öğretmen Adaylarının Mesleki Bilgi ve Becerilerine Katkısının İncelenmesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi.
Crossref
Tsai-Yen Li & I-Sheng Lin. 2019. Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education. Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives on 3D Printing in Education 262 285 .
A. Aranzabal, E. Epelde & M. Artetxe. (2019) Monitoring questionnaires to ensure positive interdependence and individual accountability in a chemical process synthesis following collaborative PBL approach. Education for Chemical Engineers 26, pages 58-66.
Crossref
Mohamed El Alaoui, Khalid El Yassini & Hussain Ben-Azza. 2019. Innovations in Smart Cities Applications Edition 2. Innovations in Smart Cities Applications Edition 2 408 418 .
Mohamed El Alaoui, Khalid El Yassini & Hussain Ben-azza. (2018) Enhancing MOOCs peer reviews validity and reliability by a fuzzy coherence measure. Enhancing MOOCs peer reviews validity and reliability by a fuzzy coherence measure.
Valvanuz Fuentes-Diego & Irina Salcines-Talledo. (2018) Estudio sobre la Implementación de la Evaluación Formativa y Compartida en un Ciclo Formativo de Grado Superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa 11:2, pages 91-112.
Crossref
Mallory A. Jackson, Alina Tran, Mary Pat Wenderoth & Jennifer H. Doherty. (2018) Peer vs. Self-Grading of Practice Exams: Which Is Better?. CBE—Life Sciences Education 17:3, pages es44.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.