2,474
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Making judgements: investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (26)

Natalie Usher. (2024) Self-regulating writers’ uses and non-uses of peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 49:1, pages 53-65.
Read now
Xiaosa Li & Ping Ke. (2022) An empirical study of peer feedback in translation didactics: quality, response and student perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:8, pages 1231-1244.
Read now
Wei Su & Axian Huang. (2022) More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:7, pages 1005-1015.
Read now
Jeanette Carlsson Hauff & Jonas Nilsson. (2022) Students’ experience of making and receiving peer assessment: the effect of self-assessed knowledge and trust. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:6, pages 959-971.
Read now
David Nicol & Geethanjali Selvaretnam. (2022) Making internal feedback explicit: harnessing the comparisons students make during two-stage exams. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:4, pages 507-522.
Read now
Murad Abdu Saeed & Huda Suleiman Al Qunayeer. (2022) Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. The Language Learning Journal 50:3, pages 360-377.
Read now
David Nicol & Suzanne McCallum. (2022) Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:3, pages 424-443.
Read now
M. C. Iglesias Pérez, J. Vidal-Puga & M. R. Pino Juste. (2022) The role of self and peer assessment in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education 47:3, pages 683-692.
Read now
Marlies Schillings, Herma Roebertsen, Hans Savelberg, Anne van Dijk & Diana Dolmans. (2021) Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: students’ perspective. Higher Education Research & Development 40:5, pages 1100-1116.
Read now
David Nicol. (2021) The power of internal feedback: exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46:5, pages 756-778.
Read now
Gale Macleod, Neil Lent, Xiaomeng Tian, Yunying Liang, Meredith Moore & Shrawani Sen. (2020) Balancing supportive relationships and developing independence: an activity theory approach to understanding feedback in context for master’s students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:7, pages 958-972.
Read now
Laura Ketonen, Pasi Nieminen & Markus Hähkiöniemi. (2020) The development of secondary students’ feedback literacy: Peer assessment as an intervention. The Journal of Educational Research 113:6, pages 407-417.
Read now
Huda Suleiman Al Qunayeer. (2020) Supporting postgraduates in research proposals through peer feedback in a Malaysian university. Journal of Further and Higher Education 44:7, pages 956-970.
Read now
Ye Han & Yueting Xu. (2020) The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:5, pages 680-696.
Read now
Bart Huisman, Nadira Saab, Jan Van Driel & Paul Van Den Broek. (2020) A questionnaire to assess students’ beliefs about peer-feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 57:3, pages 328-338.
Read now
Bart Huisman, Nadira Saab, Paul van den Broek & Jan van Driel. (2019) The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:6, pages 863-880.
Read now
David Carless & David Boud. (2018) The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:8, pages 1315-1325.
Read now
Qi Wu & Tansy Jessop. (2018) Formative assessment: missing in action in both research-intensive and teaching focused universities?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:7, pages 1019-1031.
Read now
Bart Huisman, Nadira Saab, Jan van Driel & Paul van den Broek. (2018) Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:6, pages 955-968.
Read now
Qiyun Zhu & David Carless. (2018) Dialogue within peer feedback processes: clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development 37:4, pages 883-897.
Read now
Jaclyn Broadbent, Ernesto Panadero & David Boud. (2018) Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: a case study in a large class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:2, pages 307-322.
Read now
Genevieve Simpson & Julian Clifton. (2016) Assessing postgraduate student perceptions and measures of learning in a peer review feedback process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:4, pages 501-514.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (43)

Michel van der Eijk, Urjan Jacobs & Christiaan Tempelman. (2024) Enhancing self-learning skills and quality through formative actions and feedback within chemistry classes in the laboratory – A useful model. Education for Chemical Engineers 48, pages 22-30.
Crossref
Marwa Madi, Shazia Sadaf, Zahra Al Dawood, Amal Asiri, Faraz Ahmed Farooqi, Maha Abdelsalam & Jehan AlHumaid. (2024) Peer evaluation as an alternative assessment method for case presentations: A cross‐sectional study of dental students' perception. Journal of Dental Education.
Crossref
Alireza Memari Hanjani. (2024) Comparing trained EFL peer reviewers’ feedback: From claim to reality. Assessing Writing 60, pages 100836.
Crossref
Shulin Yu. 2024. Peer Assessment in Writing Instruction. Peer Assessment in Writing Instruction.
George Gyamfi, Barbara E. Hanna & Hassan Khosravi. (2024) Impact of an instructional guide and examples on the quality of feedback: insights from a randomised controlled study. Educational technology research and development.
Crossref
Paul Treschman, Michalis Stylianou & Cam Brooks. (2024) A scoping review of feedback in physical education: Conceptualisations and the role of teachers and students. European Physical Education Review.
Crossref
Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, Field M. Watts & Ginger V. Shultz. (2024) Reading, receiving, revising: A case study on the relationship between peer review and revision in writing-to-learn. Assessing Writing 59, pages 100808.
Crossref
Chiara Laici & Maila Pentucci. (2023) Developing university students' feedback literacy through peer feedback activities. EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY:1, pages 204-222.
Crossref
Marta De Angelis, Filippo Bruni & Livia Petti. (2023) Developing feedback literacy in initial teacher education: Results from an investigation. EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY:1, pages 152-164.
Crossref
Giovannina Albano, Anna Pierri & Cristina Sabena. (2023) Grasping criteria for success: engaging undergraduate students in formative feedback by means of digital peer workshops. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA 42:2, pages 187-206.
Crossref
Chris Banister. (2020) Exploring peer feedback processes and peer feedback meta-dialogues with learners of academic and business English. Language Teaching Research 27:3, pages 746-764.
Crossref
Ingrid Van Rompay-Bartels & Jannemieke Geessink. (2021) Exploring peer feedback on behaviour in the international classroom: a case study on students’ experiences and perceptions. Journal of International Education in Business 16:1, pages 1-17.
Crossref
Julia Kasch, Peter van Rosmalen & Marco Kalz. 2023. The Power of Peer Learning. The Power of Peer Learning 265 287 .
Mohammed Abdullah Alharbi & Abdulrahman Nasser Alqefari. (2022) Students’ uptake and perspectives on teacher and peer feedback on written assignments. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives 18:2, pages 107-118.
Crossref
David Carless. (2020) From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education 23:2, pages 143-153.
Crossref
Keith Gray, Robert Riegler & Michael Walsh. (2022) Students’ feedback experiences and expectations pre- and post-university entry. SN Social Sciences 2:2.
Crossref
Stephanie A. Berg & Alena Moon. (2022) Prompting hypothetical social comparisons to support chemistry students’ data analysis and interpretations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 23:1, pages 124-136.
Crossref
Eleni Meletiadou. (2022) Learners' Perceptions of Peer Assessment. International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development 5:1, pages 1-14.
Crossref
Namrata Chhabra, Sahiba Kukreja & Sahil Chhabra. (2021) How to Improve the Efficacy of Student Feedback. Indian Pediatrics 59:1, pages 80-86.
Crossref
Chan Chang-Tik. 2022. Collaborative Active Learning. Collaborative Active Learning 53 79 .
Chan Chang-Tik. 2022. Collaborative Active Learning. Collaborative Active Learning 3 31 .
Fatma Betül KURNAZ ADIBATMAZ. (2021) Online peer assessment in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 4:4, pages 835-853.
Crossref
Paul Tristen Balwant & Roshnie Doon. (2021) Alternatives to the conventional ‘Oxford’ tutorial model: a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 18:1.
Crossref
Floris M. van Blankenstein, John F. O’Sullivan, Nadira Saab & Paul Steendijk. (2021) The effect of peer modelling and discussing modelled feedback principles on medical students’ feedback skills: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Education 21:1.
Crossref
Murad Abdu Saeed Mohammed & Musheer Abdulwahid AL-Jaberi. (2021) Google Docs or Microsoft Word? Master's students' engagement with instructor written feedback on academic writing in a cross-cultural setting. Computers and Composition 62, pages 102672.
Crossref
Eleni Meletiadou. (2021) Opening Pandora’s Box: How Does Peer Assessment Affect EFL Students’ Writing Quality?. Languages 6:3, pages 115.
Crossref
Nasir Aminu, Mohammed Hamdan & Christopher Russell. (2021) Accuracy of self-evaluation in a peer-learning environment: an analysis of a group learning model. SN Social Sciences 1:7.
Crossref
Murad Abdu Saeed, Huda Suleiman Al Qunayeer & Musheer Abdulwahid AL-Jaberi. (2021) Exploring Supervisory Feedback Formulation on Academic Writing of Research Proposals and Postgraduates’ Responses to Feedback: A Case Study. SAGE Open 11:2, pages 215824402110071.
Crossref
Lucie Mottier Lopez, Céline Girardet & Taha Naji. (2021) Continuous assessment for learning: issues of multiple instances of peer feedback in a university course. Mesure et évaluation en éducation 44:spécial, pages 1.
Crossref
Lucie Mottier Lopez, Céline Girardet & Taha Naji. (2021) L’évaluation continue pour apprendre : enjeux de la pluralité des feedbacks entre pairs dans un cours universitaire. Mesure et évaluation en éducation 44:2, pages 1.
Crossref
Indira N. Z. Day, Wilfried Admiraal & Nadira Saab. 2021. Student Retention and Success in Higher Education. Student Retention and Success in Higher Education 217 249 .
Eva Hartell & Jeffrey Buckley. 2021. Handbook for Online Learning Contexts: Digital, Mobile and Open. Handbook for Online Learning Contexts: Digital, Mobile and Open 289 307 .
Yumei Fan & Jinfen Xu. (2020) Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 50, pages 100775.
Crossref
Lili Tian & Yu Zhou. (2020) Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System 91, pages 102247.
Crossref
Montathar Faraon, Kari Rönkkö, Mikael Wiberg & Robert Ramberg. (2019) Learning by coding: A sociocultural approach to teaching web development in higher education. Education and Information Technologies 25:3, pages 1759-1783.
Crossref
Bin Shen, Barry Bai & Weihe Xue. (2020) The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation 64, pages 100821.
Crossref
Kathryn Janet Meldrum & Kristi Giselsson. 2020. Evidence-Based Faculty Development Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). Evidence-Based Faculty Development Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) 161 180 .
Thinh Ngoc Pham, Mei Lin, Vu Quang Trinh & Lien Thi Phuong Bui. (2020) Electronic Peer Feedback, EFL Academic Writing and Reflective Thinking: Evidence From a Confucian Context. SAGE Open 10:1, pages 215824402091455.
Crossref
Simon Knight. 2020. Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World. Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World 129 145 .
Dolors Cañabate, Lluís Nogué, Teresa Serra & Jordi Colomer. (2019) Supportive Peer Feedback in Tertiary Education: Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions. Education Sciences 9:4, pages 280.
Crossref
Renée M. Filius, Renske A.M. de Kleijn, Sabine G. Uijl, Frans J. Prins, Harold V.M. van Rijen & Diederick E. Grobbee. (2019) Audio peer feedback to promote deep learning in online education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35:5, pages 607-619.
Crossref
Shulin Yu. (2019) Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from Master's students in the Macau EFL context. Assessing Writing 40, pages 42-52.
Crossref
Mark J. S. Gan & John Hattie. (2014) Prompting secondary students’ use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an investigative task. Instructional Science 42:6, pages 861-878.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.