Citations (49)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (5)
Christine D. Tippett. (2016) What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education 38:5, pages 725-746.
Read now
Read now
Mesut Saçkes, Mandy McCormick Smith & Kathy Cabe Trundle. (2016) US and Turkish preschoolers’ observational knowledge of astronomy. International Journal of Science Education 38:1, pages 116-129.
Read now
Read now
İdris Aktas & İbrahim Bılgın. (2015) The effect of the 4MAT learning model on the achievement and motivation of 7th grade students on the subject of particulate nature of matter and an examination of student opinions on the model. Research in Science & Technological Education 33:1, pages 1-21.
Read now
Read now
Jan Christoph Hadenfeldt, Xiufeng Liu & Knut Neumann. (2014) Framing students’ progression in understanding matter: a review of previous research. Studies in Science Education 50:2, pages 181-208.
Read now
Read now
Phil Seok Oh & Sung Jin Oh. (2011) What Teachers of Science Need to Know about Models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education 33:8, pages 1109-1130.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (44)
Jaeyong Lee, Gyeong-Geon Lee & Hun-Gi Hong. (2023) Automated Assessment of Student Hand Drawings in Free-Response Items on the Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal of Science Education and Technology 32:4, pages 549-566.
Crossref
Crossref
Özge GÖKTÜRK & Sedat KANADLI. (2023) Madde ve Doğası Konusu Öğretiminde Kullanılan Yöntemlerin Etkililiğinin İncelenmesi: Meta Analiz ÇalışmasıInvestigation of the Effectiveness of the Methods Used in the Teaching of the Subject of Matter and its Nature: A Meta-Analysis Study. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 10:1, pages 85-102.
Crossref
Crossref
Shuaishuai Mi, Jianqiang Ye, Li Yan & Hualin Bi. (2023) Development and validation of a conceptual survey instrument to evaluate senior high school students’ understanding of electrostatics. Physical Review Physics Education Research 19:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Desfaur Natalia, Asni Johari, Evita Anggereini & Intan Lestari. 2023. Proceedings of the 4th Green Development International Conference (GDIC 2022). Proceedings of the 4th Green Development International Conference (GDIC 2022)
273
277
.
Suat Türkoguz & İzel Ercan. (2022) Effect of visual anthropomorphic stories on students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and anthropomorphic discourse. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 23:1, pages 206-225.
Crossref
Crossref
Funda Savasci-Acikalin. (2019) How Middle School Students Represent Phase Change and Interpret Textbook Representations: a Comparison of Student and Textbook Representations. Research in Science Education 51:6, pages 1651-1685.
Crossref
Crossref
JING DING & Jeffrey C. F. Ho. (2021) Mapping Engaging Experiences and Frame Shifting in Elucidation and Interactive Animation with Blending Theory in Public Exhibitions. Mapping Engaging Experiences and Frame Shifting in Elucidation and Interactive Animation with Blending Theory in Public Exhibitions.
Sigal Samon & Sharona T. Levy. (2021) The Role of Physical and Computer-Based Experiences in Learning Science Using a Complex Systems Approach. Science & Education 30:3, pages 717-753.
Crossref
Crossref
Vanessa Sesto & Isabel García-Rodeja. (2021) How Do Five- to Six-Year-Old Children Interpret a Burning Candle?. Education Sciences 11:5, pages 213.
Crossref
Crossref
Sayamon Mekwong & Suthida Chamrat. (2021) The Development Learning Activities Using Three Levels of Chemical Representation for Enhance Upper Secondary Students’ Organic Chemistry Concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1835:1, pages 012027.
Crossref
Crossref
Hayuni Retno Widarti. Multiple representations in chemistry learning: A study on teachers’ literacy. Multiple representations in chemistry learning: A study on teachers’ literacy.
Jih-Yuan Chang, Meng-Fei Cheng, Shih-Yin Lin & Jang-Long Lin. (2021) Exploring students’ translation performance and use of intermediary representations among multiple representations: Example from torque and rotation. Teaching and Teacher Education 97, pages 103209.
Crossref
Crossref
Mustafa ALYAR & Kemal DOMUŞ. (2020) İŞBİRLİKLİ ÖĞRENME İLE BİRLİKTE KULLANILAN MODELLERİN, ANİMASYONLARIN VE YEDİ İLKE’NİN KİMYA BAŞARISINA ETKİSİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi:41, pages 1-25.
Crossref
Crossref
Ayşegül Derman & Jazlin Ebenezer. (2018) The Effect of Multiple Representations of Physical and Chemical Changes on the Development of Primary Pre-service Teachers Cognitive Structures. Research in Science Education 50:4, pages 1575-1601.
Crossref
Crossref
Rosyidah Syafaatur Rohmah, Fariati & Suhadi Ibnu. Effect of conceptual change texts on physical inorganic chemistry students’ misconceptions of matter and its changes. Effect of conceptual change texts on physical inorganic chemistry students’ misconceptions of matter and its changes.
Bruce Johnson & Jan Činčera. (2019) Development of the ecological concepts of energy flow and materials cycling in middle school students participating in earth education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation 63, pages 94-101.
Crossref
Crossref
Ayşegül ERGÜN & Mustafa SARIKAYA. (2019) THE EFFECT OF MODEL BASED LEARNING ON THE ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF MIDDLE-SCHOOL STUDENTS ON THE PARTICULATE NATURE OF MATTERMODELE DAYALI ÖĞRENMENİN ORTAOKUL ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN MADDENİN PARÇACIKLI YAPISI KONUSUNDAKİ AKADEMİK BAŞARILARINA VE KAVRAMSAL ANLAMALARINA ETKİSİ. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 18:72, pages 2059-2075.
Crossref
Crossref
Parno, L Yuliati & B Q A Ni’mah. (2019) The influence of PBL-STEM on students’ problem-solving skills in the topic of optical instruments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1171, pages 012013.
Crossref
Crossref
Fátima A. A. Araújo, J. Bernardino Lopes, A. A. Soares & J. Cravino. 2019. Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education. Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education
319
330
.
Stefan M. Irby, Emily J. Borda & Justin Haupt. (2017) Effects of Implementing a Hybrid Wet Lab and Online Module Lab Curriculum into a General Chemistry Course: Impacts on Student Performance and Engagement with the Chemistry Triplet. Journal of Chemical Education 95:2, pages 224-232.
Crossref
Crossref
Ioanna Bellou, Nikiforos M. Papachristos & Tassos A. Mikropoulos. 2018. Digital Technologies: Sustainable Innovations for Improving Teaching and Learning. Digital Technologies: Sustainable Innovations for Improving Teaching and Learning
57
80
.
Arzu KİRMAN BİLGİN & Nevzat YİĞİT. (2017) Investigation of Effectiveness of Teaching Materials Based on REACT Strategy on Revelation of the Relationship between "Density" Concept and Contexts. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, pages 495-519.
Crossref
Crossref
Sigal Samon & Sharona T. Levy. (2017) Micro-macro compatibility: When does a complex systems approach strongly benefit science learning?. Science Education 101:6, pages 985-1014.
Crossref
Crossref
Mehmet Demirbağ & Sevgi Kingir. (2017) PROMOTING PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING ABOUT BOILING BY DIALOGIC TEACHING. Journal of Baltic Science Education 16:4, pages 459-471.
Crossref
Crossref
N. Marpaung, L. Liliasari & A. Setiawan. 2017. Ideas for 21st Century Education. Ideas for 21st Century Education
177
180
.
Tülay Şenel Çoruhlu. (2017) PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ CONCEPTIONS OF THE "CONDUCTION OF HEAT IN SOLIDS". Journal of Baltic Science Education 16:2, pages 163-174.
Crossref
Crossref
Arzu KİRMAN BİLGİN & Nevzat YİĞİT. (2017) Öğrencilerin “Maddenin Tanecikli Yapısı” Konusu ile Bağlamları İlişkilendirme Durumlarının İncelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, pages 303-303.
Crossref
Crossref
Tuszie Widhiyanti, David F. Treagust, Mauro Mocerino & Venkat Vishnumolakala. Content knowledge development in a chemistry teacher preparation program: A current potentials and challenges. Content knowledge development in a chemistry teacher preparation program: A current potentials and challenges.
Cari F. Herrmann-Abell, Mary Koppal & Jo Ellen Roseman. (2016)
Toward High School Biology
: Helping Middle School Students Understand Chemical Reactions and Conservation of Mass in Nonliving and Living Systems
. CBE—Life Sciences Education 15:4, pages ar74.
Crossref
Crossref
Jingying Wang, Yue Zhang & Weizhao Shi. (2016) RESEARCH ON THE COGNITIVE LEVEL OF STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF PHYSICS MODELS AND MODELING MECHANISM IN CHINESE HIGH SCHOOLS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 15:2, pages 204-215.
Crossref
Crossref
Paulo Sérgio de Camargo Filho, Carlos Eduardo Laburú & Marcelo Alves de Barros. (2015) Para além dos paradigmas da medição. Ciência & Educação (Bauru) 21:4, pages 817-834.
Crossref
Crossref
Ryan S. Nixon, Leigh K. Smith & Jennifer J. Wimmer. (2015) Teaching Multiple Modes of Representation in Middle-School Science Classrooms: Impact on Student Learning and Multimodal Use. School Science and Mathematics 115:4, pages 186-199.
Crossref
Crossref
MIHYE WON, HEOJEONG YOON & DAVID F. TREAGUST. (2014) Students’ Learning Strategies With Multiple Representations: Explanations of the Human Breathing Mechanism. Science Education 98:5, pages 840-866.
Crossref
Crossref
Imelda Caleon & R Subramaniam. (2013) Addressing students’ alternative conceptions on the propagation of periodic waves using a refutational text. Physics Education 48:5, pages 657-663.
Crossref
Crossref
Ataman Karacop & Kemal Doymus. (2012) Effects of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning and Animation Techniques on Students’ Understanding of Chemical Bonding and Their Conceptions of the Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22:2, pages 186-203.
Crossref
Crossref
Mike Stieff, Minjung Ryu & Jason C. Yip. (2013) Speaking across levels – generating and addressing levels confusion in discourse. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:4, pages 376-389.
Crossref
Crossref
Georgios Tsitsipis, Dimitrios Stamovlasis & George Papageorgiou. (2011) A PROBABILISTIC MODEL FOR STUDENTS’ ERRORS AND MISCONCEPTIONS ON THE STRUCTURE OF MATTER IN RELATION TO THREE COGNITIVE VARIABLES. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10:4, pages 777-802.
Crossref
Crossref
Guilherme A. Marson & Bayardo B. Torres. (2011) Fostering Multirepresentational Levels of Chemical Concepts: A Framework To Develop Educational Software. Journal of Chemical Education 88:12, pages 1616-1622.
Crossref
Crossref
Mike Stieff. (2011) Improving representational competence using molecular simulations embedded in inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:10, pages 1137-1158.
Crossref
Crossref
Sedat Ucar & Kathy Cabe Trundle. (2011) Conducting guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, web-based data. Computers & Education 57:2, pages 1571-1582.
Crossref
Crossref
Haluk Özmen. (2011) Effect of animation enhanced conceptual change texts on 6th grade students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and transformation during phase changes. Computers & Education 57:1, pages 1114-1126.
Crossref
Crossref
Sedat Ucar, Kathy Cabe Trundle & Lawrence Krissek. (2010) Inquiry-based Instruction with Archived, Online Data: An Intervention Study with Preservice Teachers. Research in Science Education 41:2, pages 261-282.
Crossref
Crossref
Mesut Saçkes, Lucia M. Flevares & Kathy Cabe Trundle. (2010) Four- to six-year-old children's conceptions of the mechanism of rainfall. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 25:4, pages 536-546.
Crossref
Crossref
Emine Adadan, Kathy Cabe Trundle & Karen E. Irving. (2010) Exploring Grade 11 students' conceptual pathways of the particulate nature of matter in the context of multirepresentational instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47:8, pages 1004-1035.
Crossref
Crossref