1,466
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Interpreting Images of Fracking: How Visual Frames and Standing Attitudes Shape Perceptions of Environmental Risk and Economic Benefit

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 322-343 | Received 27 Jan 2017, Accepted 20 Sep 2017, Published online: 04 Jan 2018

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (13)

Joshua Garland. (2023) Iconoclash and the climate movement. Visual Studies 0:0, pages 1-12.
Read now
Joshua Garland, Clare Saunders, Cristiana Olcese & Delacey Tedesco. (2023) Anti-fracking campaigns in the United Kingdom: the influence of local opportunity structures on protest. Social Movement Studies 22:2, pages 211-231.
Read now
Efrat Gommeh, Karin Schroën & Tamara Metze. (2022) Processed food dream or nightmare? Influential online sentiment coalitions. NJAS: Impact in Agricultural and Life Sciences 94:1, pages 80-111.
Read now
Elaine Teixeira Rabello, Efrat Gommeh, Andrea Benedetti, Gabriel Valerio-Ureña & Tamara Metze. (2022) Mapping online visuals of shale gas controversy: a digital methods approach. Information, Communication & Society 25:15, pages 2264-2281.
Read now
Ahmed Al-Rawi, Alaa Al-Musalli & Pamela Aimee Rigor. (2022) Networked Flak in CNN and Fox News Memes on Instagram. Digital Journalism 10:9, pages 1464-1481.
Read now
Brianne Suldovsky & Lauren B. Frank. (2022) Strengthening public engagement on environmental hazards: insights from cross-disciplinary air pollution research. Environmental Hazards 21:3, pages 218-234.
Read now
Fred Vultee, G. Scott Burgess, Darryl Frazier & Kelsey Mesmer. (2022) Here’s What to Know About Clickbait: Effects of Image, Headline and Editing on Audience Attitudes. Journalism Practice 16:1, pages 1-18.
Read now
Efrat Gommeh, Huub Dijstelbloem & Tamara Metze. (2021) Visual discourse coalitions: visualization and discourse formation in controversies over shale gas development. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 23:3, pages 363-380.
Read now
Ran Duan, Laura Crosswell & Kari Barber. (2021) Animation in Environmental Journalism: Effects on News Perception and Information Seeking. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 65:2, pages 205-227.
Read now
Tamara Metze. (2020) Visualization in environmental policy and planning: a systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 22:5, pages 745-760.
Read now
Vivian Juliette Cortes Arevalo, Laura N. H. Verbrugge, Robert-Jan den Haan, Fedor Baart, Mascha C. van der Voort & Suzanne J. M. H. Hulscher. (2019) Users’ Perspectives About the Potential Usefulness of Online Storylines to Communicate River Research to a Multi-disciplinary Audience. Environmental Communication 13:7, pages 909-925.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (12)

Yunkang Yang, Trevor Davis & Matthew Hindman. (2023) Visual misinformation on Facebook. Journal of Communication 73:4, pages 316-328.
Crossref
Julia Wester, Dylann Turffs, Kela McEntee, Christian Pankow, Nicholas Perni, Jacob Jerome & Catherine Macdonald. (2022) Agriculture and downstream ecosystems in Florida: an analysis of media discourse. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30:2, pages 3804-3816.
Crossref
Jaana Davidjants & Katrin Tiidenberg. (2021) Activist memory narration on social media: Armenian genocide on Instagram. New Media & Society 24:10, pages 2191-2206.
Crossref
Huimin Tan, Gabrielle Wong-Parodi, Shumin Zhang & Jianhua Xu. (2022) Public risk perceptions of shale gas development: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science 89, pages 102548.
Crossref
Christian A. Klöckner & Erica LöfströmBerend Barkela, Teresa Gil López & Christian A. Klöckner. 2022. Disruptive Environmental Communication. Disruptive Environmental Communication 57 74 .
Mollie K. Murphy, Mehmet Soyer, Sebahattin Ziyanak & Taya Godfrey. (2021) “That’s Where Our Income Comes From”: Women’s Perceptions of Links Between Reproductive Struggles and Hydraulic Fracturing. Frontiers in Sociology 6.
Crossref
Erik P. Bucy & Jungseock Joo. (2020) Editors’ Introduction: Visual Politics, Grand Collaborative Programs, and the Opportunity to Think Big. The International Journal of Press/Politics 26:1, pages 5-21.
Crossref
Stephanie Geise, Diana Panke & Axel Heck. (2020) Still Images—Moving People? How Media Images of Protest Issues and Movements Influence Participatory Intentions. The International Journal of Press/Politics 26:1, pages 92-118.
Crossref
Thomas E. Powell, Michael Hameleers & Toni G. L. A. van der Meer. (2020) Selection in a Snapshot? The Contribution of Visuals to the Selection and Avoidance of Political News in Information-Rich Media Settings. The International Journal of Press/Politics 26:1, pages 46-68.
Crossref
J. Scott Brennen, Felix M. Simon & Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. (2020) Beyond (Mis)Representation: Visuals in COVID-19 Misinformation. The International Journal of Press/Politics 26:1, pages 277-299.
Crossref
Mollie K. Murphy. (2020) “We Are Seneca Lake”: Defining the Substances of Sustainable and Extractive Economics Through Anti-Fracking Activism. Frontiers in Communication 5.
Crossref
Julian Matthews & Anders Hansen. (2018) Fracturing Debate? A Review of Research on Media Coverage of “Fracking”. Frontiers in Communication 3.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.