Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/14f6103a-60d0-4ee6-aaae-2f7165a09ffb/tsta_a_1789438_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Schematic of (a) the apparatus used for reduction of SiCl4 and (b) the position of the quartz glasses.
![Figure 2. Schematic of (a) the apparatus used for reduction of SiCl4 and (b) the position of the quartz glasses.](/cms/asset/cadbaab4-a26e-4f48-838f-9c0845f5ff8d/tsta_a_1789438_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Pressures of generation and detection chambers.
Figure 3. Dependence of the estimated H-radical density on (a) the pressures in the H-radical generation chamber and the detection chamber (the pressures represented in the graph are the pressures in the detection chamber), (b) currents applied to the W filaments (the temperatures indicated in the graph are estimated W filament temperatures), and (c) the transportation distance.
![Figure 3. Dependence of the estimated H-radical density on (a) the pressures in the H-radical generation chamber and the detection chamber (the pressures represented in the graph are the pressures in the detection chamber), (b) currents applied to the W filaments (the temperatures indicated in the graph are estimated W filament temperatures), and (c) the transportation distance.](/cms/asset/ccd3d3ab-c0ab-4d9b-9608-94ff999a0ef8/tsta_a_1789438_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. (a) Appearance of quartz tubes and quartz glasses after the reduction of SiCl4. (b) XRD pattern and (c) cross-sectional SEM image of the quartz glass placed at the position B during the experiment with an applied current of 30 A. The pressure in the H-radical generation chamber and the reaction chamber were ~3 kPa and ~1.8 kPa, respectively.
![Figure 4. (a) Appearance of quartz tubes and quartz glasses after the reduction of SiCl4. (b) XRD pattern and (c) cross-sectional SEM image of the quartz glass placed at the position B during the experiment with an applied current of 30 A. The pressure in the H-radical generation chamber and the reaction chamber were ~3 kPa and ~1.8 kPa, respectively.](/cms/asset/e0db5465-7312-4435-bf92-a08a4a31a687/tsta_a_1789438_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Appearances of quartz tubes and quartz glasses after the reduction of SiCl4 with H2 and H-radicals at 900°C, and cross-sectional SEM images of the quartz glasses placed at position B. The pressures in the H-radical generation chamber and the reaction chamber were ~105 kPa and ~101 kPa, respectively.
![Figure 5. Appearances of quartz tubes and quartz glasses after the reduction of SiCl4 with H2 and H-radicals at 900°C, and cross-sectional SEM images of the quartz glasses placed at position B. The pressures in the H-radical generation chamber and the reaction chamber were ~105 kPa and ~101 kPa, respectively.](/cms/asset/dc769562-1269-4967-bc70-f75f58757358/tsta_a_1789438_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. (a) Appearances of the quartz tubes and quartz glasses after the reduction of SiCl4 with H2 and H-radicals at 850°C, and cross-sectional SEM images of the quartz glasses placed at positions A–D. (b) XRD pattern and (c) Raman spectrum of the quartz glass placed at position D during the H-radical reduction of SiCl4. The pressures in the H-radical generation chamber and the reaction chamber were ~105 kPa and ~101 kPa, respectively.
![Figure 6. (a) Appearances of the quartz tubes and quartz glasses after the reduction of SiCl4 with H2 and H-radicals at 850°C, and cross-sectional SEM images of the quartz glasses placed at positions A–D. (b) XRD pattern and (c) Raman spectrum of the quartz glass placed at position D during the H-radical reduction of SiCl4. The pressures in the H-radical generation chamber and the reaction chamber were ~105 kPa and ~101 kPa, respectively.](/cms/asset/4f953237-1b14-4b6a-959b-6941a8af50d5/tsta_a_1789438_f0006_oc.jpg)