4,662
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Mapping roles in research-practice partnerships – a systematic literature review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1490-1518 | Received 26 May 2021, Accepted 21 Dec 2021, Published online: 24 Feb 2022

References

  • References marked with an asterisk indicate studies not cited in this article, but included in the review.
  • *Ancess, J., Barnett, E., & Allen, D. (2007). Using research to inform the practice of teachers, schools, and school reform organizations. Theory Into Practice, 46(4), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840701593915
  • *Arhar, J., Niesz, T., Brossmann, J., Koebley, S., O’Brien, K., Loe, D., & Black, F. (2013). Creating a ‘third space’ in the context of a university-school partnership: Supporting teacher action research and the research preparation of doctoral students. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.789719
  • *Askins, B. E., & Schwisow, J. A. (1988). A university-school partnership for providing inservice staff development to a rural school: The greenwood experience. Journal of Staff Development, 9(4), 40–44.
  • Aydin, U., Tunc-Pekkan, Z., Taylan, R. D., Birgili, B., & Ozcan, M. (2018). Impacts of a university-school partnership on middle school students’ fractional knowledge: A quasiexperimental study. Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1220358
  • *Baharav, H., & Newman, E. (2019). Contextual research for educational improvement: A collaborative process in northern California. Improving Schools, 22(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219853456
  • *Banta, S., Cool, M., Hansen, M., Heckler, J., Masker, T., Plavchan, K., Sobol, M., Blessing, L., Starzynski, M., & Carr, M. (2013). Timbercrest Elementary and the University of Central Florida: From theory into practice - A school’s story. School-University Partnerships, 6(1), 92–99.
  • *Barth, D., Catoe, S., Powell, P., Brigman, G., & Field, B. E. (2009). North Springs Elementary School and the University of South Carolina: A partnership that works. School-University Partnerships, 3(2), 31–41.
  • *Beaty-O’Ferrall, M. E., & Johnson, F. W. (2010). Using supportive team building to promote improved instruction, student achievement, and collaboration in an urban professional development school. School-University Partnerships, 4(1), 56–64.
  • *Beckett, L. (2014). Raising teachers’ voice on achievement in urban schools in England: An introduction. The Urban Review, 46(5), 783–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-014-0301-x
  • *Benenson, G., Stewart-Dawkins, S., & White, G. (2012). Engineering design of cars and gadgets in K-5 as vehicle for integrating math, science and literacy. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(2), 1–25.
  • *Betlem, E., Clary, D., & Jones, M. (2019). Mentoring the mentor: Professional development through a school-university partnership. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2018.1504280
  • Biag, M. (2017). Building a village through data: A research-practice partnership to improve youth outcomes. School Community Journal, 27(1), 9–27.
  • *Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2019). Balancing rigor, replication, and relevance: A case for multiple-cohort, longitudinal experiments. Aera Open, 5(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419876252
  • *Blue, E., & Collins, J. L. (1998). Learning to coconstruct critical learning processes in an urban school-university partnership. Urban Education, 32(5), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085998032005003
  • Borda, E., Warren, S., Coskie, T. L., Larson, B. E., Hanley, D., & Cohen, J. (2018). Cross-disciplinary, whole school education reform in secondary schools: Three critical components. School-University Partnerships, 11(1), 46–56.
  • *Campano, G., Honeyford, M. A., Sanchez, L., & Zanden, S. V. (2010). Ends in themselves: Theorizing the practice of university-school partnering through horizontalidad. Language Arts, 87(4), 277–286.
  • Campbell, T., McKenna, T. J., Fazio, X., Hetherington-Coy, A., & Pierce, P. (2019). Negotiating coherent science teacher professional learning experiences across a university and partner school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1547033
  • Cannata, M., Cohen-Vogel, L., & Sorum, M. (2017). Partnering for improvement: Improvement communities and their role in scale up. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368633
  • Century, J., & Cassata, A. (2016). Implementation research: Finding common ground on what, how, why, where, and who. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 169–215. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16665332
  • *Cicchelli, T., & Baecher, R. E. (1993). School restructuring: A school-university partnership. The School Community Journal, 3(2), 27–44.
  • Coburn, C., Bae, S., & Turner, E. O. (2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider–outsider partnerships at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 364–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560802222350
  • Coburn, C. E., Touré, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1115–1161. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100403
  • Coburn, C., & Penuel, W. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
  • Coburn, C., Penuel, W., & Geil, K. (2013). Research-practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts (0277-4232). W. T. G. Foundation.
  • *Cooney, M. H., Flor, R., & Galloway, D. (1997). Changing roles in the school/university partnership. National Association of Laboratory Schools Journal, 21(1), 11–14.
  • *Coon-Kitt, M. J., Lloyd, G. M., Wolkenhauer, R., Badiali, B., Bauer, D., Davenport, A., de Carle, A., DeWitt, K., Higgins, M., Hutchinson, D., Lynch, C., Mcdonald, C., Reitz, N., & Titus, N. (2019). The pennsylvania state university and state college area school district: Taking stock and looking to the future after 20 years of collaboration. School-University Partnerships, 12(1), 3–9.
  • *Crawford, P. A., Roberts, S. K., & Hickman, R. (2008). All together now: Authentic university-school partnerships for professional development. Childhood Education, 85(2), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2009.10523070
  • Czerniak, C., & Chiarelott, L. (1991). Teacher education for effective science instruction: Asocial cognitive perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 49–58.
  • *Dallavis, C., & Johnstone, J. (2009). An evolving university-school partnership: The university of notre dame magnificat schools. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 13(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.1302062013
  • *Dennis, D., Jacobs, J., West Burns, R., Davis, J., Van Ingen, S., Tricarico, K., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2015). Hillsborough County public schools and the University of South Florida: Better together. School-University Partnerships, 8(1), 7–12.
  • Department for Education (2013). Research priorities and questions [for] teachers and teaching (Consultation paper).
  • Desimone, L. M., Wolford, T., & Hill, K. L. (2016). Research-practice: A practical conceptual framework. AERA Open, 2(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416679599
  • Dichele, A. M. (2016). Quinnipiac School of Education–The importance of our NAPDS association. School-University Partnerships, 9(2), 5–8.
  • Dodman, S. L., Lai, K., Campet, M., Cavallero-Lotocki, R., Hopkins, A., & Onidi, C. (2014). Preparing social justice oriented teachers: The potential role of action research in the PDS. School-University Partnerships, 7(1), 85–100.
  • Dunn, A. H. (2010). ‘We know you’re black at heart’: A self-study of a white, urban high school teacher. In A. J. Stairs & K. A. Donnell (Eds.), Research on urban teacher learning: Examining contextual factors over time (pp. 29–40). IAP Information Age Publishing.
  • Edovald, T., & Nevill, C. (2021). Working out what works: The case of the education endowment foundation in england. ECNU Review of Education, 4(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120913039
  • Education act. (2013). (Cth) pt I div 1. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2020C00142
  • *Erskine-Cullen, E. (1995). School-university partnerships as change agents: One success. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(3), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345950060302
  • Ervin, R. A., Schaughency, E., Goodman, S. D., McGlinchey, M. T., & Matthews, A. (2007). Moving from a model demonstration project to a statewide initiative in Michigan: Lessons learned from merging research-practice agendas to address reading and behavior. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. Van Der Heyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 354–377). Springer Science+Business Media.
  • *Evans, K., Holley, J., Richburg-Sellers, F., Robey, S., Suber, S., Burton, M., & Field, B. E. (2012). Rice Creek Elementary School and the University of South Carolina: A shared vision for excellence. School-University Partnerships, 5(1), 19–27.
  • Every student succeeds act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ95/PLAW-114publ95.pdf
  • *Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., Staus, N. L., Wyld, J. N., Bailey, D. L., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). The “Synergies” research-practice partnership project: A “2020 vision” case study. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9716-2
  • Farley-Ripple, E., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018). Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Researcher, 47(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761042
  • Farrell, C. C., Davidson, K. L., Repko-Erwin, M. E., Penuel, W. R., Quantz, M., Wong, H., Riedy, R., & Brink, Z. (2018). A descriptive study of the IES researcher–practitioner partnerships in education research program (technical report, 3).
  • Farrell, C. C., Harrison, C., & Coburn, C. E. (2019). “What the hell is this, and who the hell are you?” Role and identity negotiation in research-practice partnerships. AERA Open, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419849595
  • Farrell, C., Penuel, W., Coburn, C., Daniel, J., & Steup, L. (2021). Research-practice partnerships in education: The state of the field. William T. Grant Foundation.
  • *Field, B. E., Blakeney, R., Burton, M., Dunlap, E., Faile, J., Hudson, Z., & Jackson, M. (2010). The University of South Carolina professional development school network: Twenty years of effective collaboration. School-University Partnerships, 4(2), 41–52.
  • *Field, B. E., & Van Scoy, I. J. (2014). The challenges never stop! Two decades of reaching for the best in clinical practice. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 436–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.938591
  • *Fielding, G. D. (1989). Improving curriculum and assessment through a school-university partnership. NASSP Bulletin, 73(513), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263658907351313
  • Finnigan, K. S., & Daly, A. J. (2014). Using research evidence in education: From the schoolhouse door to Capitol Hill. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Firestone, W. A., & Fisler, J. L. (2002). Politics, community, and leadership in a school-university partnership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 449–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316102237669
  • Foy, J. G. (2009). An effectiveness study of the bookworm project: A university-school partnership providing a low-cost, research-based early reading intervention for at-risk kindergartners. Early Childhood Services: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Effectiveness, 3(4), 281–300.
  • Garin, E., Taylor, T., Madden, M., Beiter, J., Davis, J., Farmer, C., & Nowlin, D. (2015). The Bowie State University professional development schools network partnership. School-University Partnerships, 8(2), 9–13.
  • *Gartland, D. (2010). A “special” partnership: The Towson-Waterloo-Ilchester-Bellows Spring elementary education-special education professional development school. School-University Partnerships, 4(2), 31–40.
  • Gettinger, M., Stoiber, K. C., & Lange, J. (1999). Collaborative investigation of inclusive early education practices: A blueprint for teacher-researcher partnership. Journal of Early Intervention, 22(3), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519902200308
  • *Gifford, B. R. (1986). The evolution of the school-university partnership for educational renewal. Education and Urban Society, 19(1), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124586019001006
  • Gifford, B. R., & Gabelko, N. H. (1987a). Linking practice-sensitive researchers to research-sensitive practitioners. Education and Urban Society, 19(4), 368–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124587019004002
  • Gifford, B. R., & Gabelko, N. H. (1987b). Research into research: SUPER project case studies. Education and Urban Society, 19(4), 389–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124587019004003
  • Godinho, S., White, J., Hay, T., & St. Leger, P. (2007). Many treasure soup: A school-based project for pre-service teacher educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 32(4), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2007v32n4.4
  • *Goldstein, H., McKenna, M., Barker, R. M., & Brown, T. H. (2019). Research-practice partnership: Application to implementation of multi-tiered system of supports in early childhood education. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_PERS-ST-2018-0005
  • *Goree, K., Williams, Y., Hamilton, S., Mathews-Perez, A., Talbert, S., Strot, R., Barrett, S., Bolfing, D., Miller, S., Almaguer, D., Gilbreath, D., Martinez, D., Rubio, B., Ward, V., Edison, R., Henry, M., Mechell, R., Pritchard, M., & Welsh, K. (2019). The Baylor University and Waco independent school district: A twenty-five year partnership that began with a plan in a van. School-University Partnerships, 12(1), 10–15.
  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (Vol. 2): Sage.
  • *Harrison, C., Wachen, J., Brown, S., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2019). A view from within: Lessons learned from partnering for continuous improvement. Teachers College Record, 121(9), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100902
  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
  • Henrick, E. C., Cobb, P., Penuel, W. R., Jackson, K., & Clark, T. (2017). Assessing research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness W. T. G. Foundation.
  • *Hindman, A. H., Snell, E. K., Wasik, B. A., Lewis, K. N., Hammer, C. S., & Iannone-Campbell, C. (2015). Research and practice partnerships for professional development in early childhood: Lessons from ExCELL-e. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1-2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.984036
  • Hipkins, R., & McDowall, S. (2013). Teaching for present “and future” competency: A productive focus for professional Learning. Teachers and Curriculum, 13, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v13i0.5
  • *Hirsch, S. E., Ely, E., Lloyd, J. W., & Isley, D. (2018). Targeted professional development: A data-driven approach to identifying educators’ needs. School-University Partnerships, 11(2), 84–91.
  • Honig, M. I., Venkateswaran, N., McNeil, P., & Twitchell, J. M. (2014). Leaders’ use of research for fundamental change in school district central offices: Processes and challenges. In K. S. Finnigan & A. J. Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education - from the schoolhouse door to Capitol hill (pp. 33–52). Springer.
  • Hooley, N. (2008). Teacher education as democratic public sphere. Australian Educational Researcher, 35(3), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03246288
  • Hopkins, M., Weddle, H., Gluckman, M., & Gautsch, L. (2019). Boundary crossing in a professional association: The dynamics of research use among state leaders and researchers in a research-practice partnership. AERA Open, 5(4), 772–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419891964
  • *Hudson, P., English, L. D., Dawes, L., & Macri, J. (2012). Contextualizing a university-school STEM education collaboration: Distributed and self-activated leadership for project outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(6), 772–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212456915
  • Ion, G., Stîngu, M., & Marin, E. (2018). How can researchers facilitate the utilisation of research by policy-makers and practitioners in education? Research Papers in Education, 34(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452965
  • Israel, M., Goldberger, N., Vera, E., & Heineke, A. (2017). An unlikely destination: Meeting the educational needs of immigrant, migrant and refugee children in the suburbs of Chicago, IL. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(5), 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2016-0190
  • Jesson, R. N., & Spratt, R. (2017). An intervention in literacy in three pacific nations: Implications of a context specific approach to co-design. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 16(1), 36–49.
  • *Johnson, L., & Rakestraw, J. (2013). Winthrop University - School partnership network. Educational Renaissance, 1(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.33499/edren.v1i2.57
  • Johnson, R., Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., & Leary, H. (2016). Teachers, tasks, and tensions: Lessons from a research-practice partnership. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2-3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9338-3
  • *Kamler, E., Szpara, M., Dornisch, M., Goubeaud, K., Levine, G., & Brechtel, S. (2009). Realities of a school-university partnership: Focus on leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 19(1), 81–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460901900105
  • Kenny, J., Redman, C., Hobbs, L., Jones, M., Campbell, C., Gilbert, A., … Herbert, S. (2014). Developing effective school and university partnerships for teacher education. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martinez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), Edulearn14: 6th International conference on Education and New learning technologies (pp. 2620–2632). International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED) Academy.
  • Kershner, R., Pedder, D., & Doddington, C. (2013). Professional learning during a schools–university partnership master of education course: Teachers’ perspectives of their learning experiences. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.744197
  • Kirschner, B. W., Dickinson, R., & Blosser, C. (1996). From cooperation to collaboration: The changing culture of a school/university partnership. Theory Into Practice, 35(3), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849609543724
  • *Klar, H. W., Huggins, K. S., Buskey, F. C., Desmangles, J. K., & Phelps-Ward, R. J. (2018). Developing social capital for collaboration in a research-practice partnership. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(4), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-01-2018-0005
  • *Le Cornu, R., & Peters, J. (2009). Sustaining school-university collaboration for reciprocal learning. International Journal of Learning, 16(9), 231–246.
  • Lefever-Davis, S., & Heller, M. (2003). Literacy partnerships in education. Reading Teacher, 56(6), 566–568. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.4.204-210
  • Leslie, D. A. (2011). Seeking symmetry in a school-university partnership: University of Chicago and Chicago public schools - A collaborative approach to developing models and tools for professional development and teacher preparation. Planning and Changing, 42(1-2), 120–154.
  • Lindvall, J., & Ryve, A. (2019). Coherence and the positioning of teachers in professional development programs. A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 27, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.005
  • *Mariage, T. V., & Garmon, M. A. (2003). A case of educational change: improving student achievement through a school-university partnership. Remedial and Special Education, 24(4), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240040501
  • Martin, R. E., & Groff, J. S. (2011). Collaborations in mind, brain, and education: An analysis of researcher–practitioner partnerships in three elementary school intervention studies. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(3), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01119.x
  • *McCall, M., Howell, L., Rogers, R., Osborne, L., Goree, K., Merritt, B., Cox, H., Fischer, J., Gardner, P., & Gasaway, J. (2017). Baylor university and midway independent school district: An exemplary partnership. School-University Partnerships, 10(2), 8–12.
  • McLaughlin, C. (2007). Cambridge SUPER networked learning community: A schools-university partnership for educational research. In C. McLaughlin, K. Black-Hawkins, D. McIntyre, & A. Townsend (Eds.), Networking practitioner research (pp. 138–146). Taylor & Francis.
  • *Mogge, S. G., Martinez-Alba, G., & Cruzado-Guerrero, J. (2017). Supporting school responsiveness to immigrant families and children: A university-school partnership. TESL-EJ, 20(4), 1–15.
  • *Muchmore, J. A., Cooley, V. E., Marx, G. E., & Crowell, R. A. (2004). Enhancing teacher leadership in urban education: The Oak Park experience. Educating students placed at risk. Educational Horizons, 82(3), 236–244.
  • Muñoz, M. A. (2016). Building research-practice partnerships as a district-led initiative: A high-leverage strategy for system improvement. Planning and Changing, 47(3-4), 182–190.
  • National Research Council. (2012). Using science as evidence in public policy T. N. A. Press.
  • *Nelson, T. H. (2005). Knowledge interactions in teacher-scientist partnerships - Negotiation, consultation, and rejection. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(4), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105279938
  • *Neville, E. (2010). Utilizing a school-university collaborative partnership to design, present, and support pre-K-12 coursework on differentiated instruction. School-University Partnerships, 4(2), 92–95.
  • Newman, J., Cherney, A., & Head, B. W. (2016). Do policy makers use academic research? Reexamining the “Two communities” theory of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12464
  • *Nolan, J., Badiali, B., Zembal-Saul, C., Burns, R., Edmondson, J., Bauer, D., Queeney, D., & Wheland, M. (2009). The Penn State-State College Elementary professional development school collaborative: A profile. School-University Partnerships, 3(2), 19–30.
  • Nur, M. M. (1986). The study of Stanford and the schools: Partners in educational reform. Teacher Education Quarterly, 13(2), 24–33.
  • Oates, C., & Bignell, C. (2019). School and university in partnership: A shared enquiry into teachers’ collaborative practices. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689520
  • *Osajima, K. H. (1989). Building school-university partnerships: Subjectivity, power, and the process of change. Urban Review, 21(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108498
  • *Osler, J. E., II, Bull, P. H., & Eaton, D. (2012). Dynamic educational collaboration between university and high school faculty promoting partnership in teaching and learning in the 21st century. Journal on School Educational Technology, 7(4), 34–48.
  • O’Sullivan, M., Tannehill, D., Knop, N., Pope, C., & Henninger, M. (1999). A school-university collaborative journey toward relevance and meaning in an urban high school physical education program. Quest (Grand Rapids, Mich ), 51(3), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1999.10491683
  • Paez, A. (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 10(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12266
  • *Patrizio, K. M. (2013). Learning from Lorreltag: An urban, community-school-university partnership. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 16(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458912475212
  • Penuel, W., Coburn, C., & Gallagher, D. (2013). Negotiating problems of practice in research-practice design partnerships. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 112(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311501404
  • Penuel, W., Farrell, C. C., Allen, A.-R., Toyama, Y., & Coburn, C. (2018). What research district leaders find useful. Educational Policy, 32(4), 540–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816673580
  • Penuel, W., Riedy, R., Barber, M. S., Peurach, D. J., LeBouef, W. A., & Clark, T. (2020). Principles of collaborative education research with stakeholders: Toward requirements for a new research and development infrastructure. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 627–674. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320938126
  • *Penuel, W., & Watkins, D. A. (2019). Assessment to promote equity and epistemic justice: A use-case of a research-practice partnership in science education. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843249
  • Penuel, W. R., Briggs, D. C., Davidson, K. L., Herlihy, C., Sherer, D., Hill, H. C., Farrell, C., & Allen, A.-R. (2017). How school and district leaders access, perceive, and use research. AERA Open, 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417705370
  • *Post, J., & Lubeck, S. (2000). Head start-university collaborations: Widening the circle. Childhood Education, 76(5), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2000.10522113
  • Potvin, A. S., Kaplan, R. G., Boardman, A. G., & Polman, J. L. (2018). Configuration in co-design - participant structures in partnership work. In B. Bevan & W. R. Penuel (Eds.), Connecting research and practice for educational improvement (pp. 135–149). Routledge.
  • Prøitz, T. S., Mausethagen, S., & Skedsmo, G. (2017). Investigative modes in research on data use in education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1326280
  • *Quaglia, R. J., Townsend, R. C., & McIntire, W. G. (1992). Influencing student and staff aspirations: A school improvement project. Rural Educator, 13(2), 16–20.
  • *Raia-Hawrylak, A., Glover, T. A., & Guerriero, L. A. (2019). Supporting systems-level school climate improvement via a data-driven consultation framework: A K-12 school–university partnership. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2019.1629944
  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
  • Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Donnan, M. F., Garcia, D., Snead-Johnson, M., Kotulka, E., Sandilos, L. E. (2018). A partnered approach to school change in a rural community: Reflections and recommendations. Foundation Review, 10(4), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1446
  • Roderick, M., Easton, J. Q., & Sebring, P. (2007). Developing new roles for research in new policy environments: The Consortium on Chicago School research. The Consortium on Chicago School Research.
  • Rosenquist, B. A., Henrick, E. C., & Smith, T. M. (2015). Research-practice partnerships to support the development of high quality mathematics instruction for all students. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1-2), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.988335
  • Russell, J., Stein, M. K., Correnti, R., Bill, V., Booker, L., & Schwartz, N. (2017). Tennessee scales up improved math instruction through coaching. State Education Standard, 17(2), 23–27.
  • Ryve, A., & Hemmi, K. (2019). Educational policy to improve mathematics instruction at scale: Conceptualizing contextual factors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(3), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09887-6
  • *Sanzo, K. L., Myran, S., & Clayton, J. K. (2011). Building bridges between knowledge and practice: A university-school district leadership preparation program partnership. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 292–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129073
  • *Schlessinger, S., & Oyler, C. (2015). Commentary: Inquiry-based teacher learning for inclusivity: Professional development for action and change. Learning Landscapes, 8(2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v8i2.694
  • SFS 2010:800. Skollag. Utbildningsdepartementet.
  • *Siers, R., Jr., Elburn, S., Gasior, P., Briggs, R., & Ramey, C. (2015). Mardela middle and high school and Salisbury university PDS partnership. School-University Partnerships, 8(2), 3–8.
  • *Singh, P., & Glasswell, K. (2013). Chasing social change: Matters of concern and the mattering practice of educational research. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 1(2), 162–183.
  • *Steel, S., Shambaugh, N., Combs, J., Farley, R., Hayes, S., Morewood, A., … Yohe, S. (2012). The Benedum collaborative–features for simultaneous renewal. School-University Partnerships, 5(2), 13–18.
  • Stevens, D. D., & Everhart, R. B. (2000). Designing and tailoring school/university partnerships: A straightjacket, security blanket, or just a loose coat? Professional Educator, 22(2), 39–49.
  • Stoddard, K., Hewitt, M., O’Connor, D., Beckner, J., Elder, M., Laporta, C., & Poth, J. (1996). Inclusive practices through teacher research. Remedial and Special Education, 17(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259601700406
  • Thompson, J., Richards, J., Shim, S. Y., Lohwasser, K., Von Esch, K. S., Chew, C., Sjoberg, B., & Morris, A. (2019). Launching networked PLCs: Footholds into creating and improving knowledge of ambitious and equitable teaching practices in an RPP. Aera Open, 5(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419875718
  • Tseng, V., Easton, J. Q., & Supplee, L. H. (2017). Research-practice partnerships: Building two-way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2017.tb00089.x
  • Tseng, V., Fleischman, S., & Quintero, E. (2018). Democratizing evidence in education. In B. Bevan & W. Penuel (Eds.), Connecting research and practice for educational improvement: Ethical and equitable approaches (pp. 3–16). Routledge.
  • Tseng, V., & Nutley, S. (2014). Building the infrastructure to improve the use and usefulness of research in education. In K. S Finnagan, & A. J. Daly (Eds), Using research evidence in education (pp. 163–175). Springer international.
  • Vanderlinde, R., & Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902919257
  • Van Kannel-Ray, N., Lacefield, W. E., & Zeller, P. J. (2008). Academic case managers: Evaluating a middle school intervention for children at-risk. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 5(10), 21–29.
  • Van Kraayenoord, C. E., Honan, E., & Moni, K. B. (2011). Negotiating knowledge in a researcher and teacher collaborative research partnership. Teacher Development, 15(4), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2011.635267
  • *Warren, L. L., & Peel, H. A. (2005). Collaborative model for school reform through a rural school/university partnership. Education, 126(2), 346–352.
  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis: Sage.
  • Welsh, R. O. (2021). Assessing the quality of education research through its relevance to practice: An integrative review of research-practice partnerships. Review of Research in Education, 45(1), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20985082
  • Wentworth, L., Conaway, C., Shewchuk, S., & Arce-Trigatti, P. (2021). RPP brokers handbook: A guide to brokering in education research practice partnerships. National Network of Education Research Practice Partnerships.
  • Wentworth, L., Khanna, R., Nayfack, M., & Schwartz, D. (2021). Closing the research-practice gap in education. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 19(2), 57–58. https://doi.org/10.48558/EH5B-Y819
  • What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What works clearinghouse standards handbook (4.1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
  • *Wilcox, K. C., Lawson, H. A., & Angelis, J. I. (2017). COMPASS-AIM: A university/P–12 partnership innovation for continuous improvement. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(5), 649–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368654