References
- Amer, A. A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(4), 214–230. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252499155_Reflections_on_Bloom's_Revised_Taxonomy
- Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). Longman.
- Arthurs, L. (2019). Undergraduate geoscience education research: Evolution of an emerging field of discipline-based education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(2), 118–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21471
- Bakke, H. K., Bakke, H. K., & Schwebs, R. (2017). First-aid training in school: Amount, content and hindrances. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 61(10), 1361–1370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12958
- Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain Eds. David McKay.
- Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
- Braund, H. (2017). Exploring the dynamic relationship between metacognition and curriculum: Suggestions for integration and implementation. Graduate Student Symposium, Selected Papers, 11, 71–94. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315742282_Exploring_the_dynamic_relationship_between_metacognition_and_curriculum_Suggestions_for_integration_and_implementation
- Bray, M., & Thomas, R. M. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies. Different Insights from Different Literatures and the Value of Multilevel Analyses. Harvard Educational Revue, 65(3), 472–490. https://web.edu.hku.hk/f/acadstaff/376/Bray-Thomas-Comparison-1995.pdf
- Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2019). Metacognition. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/272307-metacognition.pdf
- Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment. (2019). Guidance on Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Key Stage 4. Retrieved November 26, 2020, from:https://ccea.org.uk/learning-resources/guidance-teaching-learning-and-assessment-key-stage-4
- Daněk, P. (2020). Výuka regionální geografie? Situace je vážná, nikoli však zoufalá! [Teaching regional geography? The situation is serious, but not desperate!]. Informace ČGS, 39(2), 24–31. https://geography.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/icgs022020_danek.pdf
- Darwazeh, A. N., & Branch, R. M. (2015). A Revision to the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. In M. Simonson (Ed.), 38th Annual Proceedings: Selected Papers On the Practice of Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 220–225). Nova Southeastern University.
- Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Aldine.
- Edwards, N. (2010). An analysis of the alignment of the Grade 12 Physical Sciences examination and the core curriculum in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 30(4), 571–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v30n4a389
- Dziennik, Ustaw. (2012). Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej: Rozporządzenie Ministra Edukacji Narodowej. Retrieved August 26, 2020, from:http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20120000977/O/D20120977.pdf
- Elmas, R., Rusek, M., Lindell, A., Nieminen, P., Kasapoglu, K., & Bílek, M. (2020). The intellectual demands of the intended chemistry curriculum in Czechia, Finland, and Turkey: A comparative analysis based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 839–851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00058B
- European Parliament and the Council. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, L394/10–18. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32006H0962
- Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
- Georghiades, P. (2006). The role of metacognitive activities in the contextual use of primary pupils’ conceptions of science. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 29–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3954-8
- GOV.SI, Portal. (n.d.). Programi in učni načrti v osnovni šoli: Učni načrti obveznih predmetov. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from:https://www.gov.si/teme/programi-in-ucni-nacrti-v-osnovni-soli/
- Grajkowski, W., Ostrowska, B., & Poziomek, U. (2014). Core curriculum for science subjects in selected countries - study report. Educational Research Institute.http://eduentuzjasci.pl/en/publications/1147-core-curriculum-for-science-subjects-in-selected-countries-study-report.html
- Greger, D., Gröschlová, A., & Ježková, V. (2006). Analýza školního vzdělávání ve vybraných zemích EU [Analysis of school education in selected EU countries], Orbis Scholae 0(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.133
- Greif, R., Lockey, A. S., Conaghan, P., Lippert, A., De Vries, W., & Monsieurs, K. G., Education and implementation of resuscitation section Collaborators. (2015). European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 10. Education and Implementation of Resuscitation. Resuscitation, 95(Oct.), 288–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.032
- Harden, R. M. (2002). Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: Is there a difference? Medical Teacher, 24(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159022020687
- Hartman, H. J. (Ed.). (2001). Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice. Springer.
- Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000276961
- Horváth, G., & Próbald, F. (2003). Geographical education in a region of transition – East Central Europe. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040308667523
- Janoušková, S., Dvořák, L., & Vondrová, N. (Eds.). (2019). Comparative Study of Mathematical and Science Education in the Czech Republic and in Selected European Countries [Special issue]. Scientia in Educatione, 10(3). https://ojs.cuni.cz/scied/issue/view/146
- Kamens, D. H., & Benavot, A. (1991). Elite Knowledge for the Masses: The Origins and Spread of Mathematics and Science Education in National Curricula. American Journal of Education, 99(2), 137–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/443977
- Kennedy, D., Hyland, Á., & Ryan, N. (2007). Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: A Practical Guide. Quality Promotion Unit, University College Cork.
- Knecht, P., & Hofmann, E. (2020). Jak dál ve výuce regionální geografie na základních školách? [How to continue with the teaching of regional geography at elementary schools?]. Informace ČGS, 39(2), 14–23. https://geography.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/icgs022020_knecht.pdf
- Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
- Kreitzer, A. E., & Madaus, G. F. (1994). Empirical Investigations of the Hierarchical Structure of the Taxonomy. In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospective, 64–81. University of Chicago Press
- Kridel, C. (Ed.). (2010). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Kuba, R., Říha, R., Zvěřinová, G., & Křečková, A. (2019). Aktuální trendy ve výuce první pomoci aneb vzdělávání budoucích i současných pedagogů zážitkovou pedagogikou [Current Trends in First Aid Teaching— the Use of Inquiry Based Teaching in Courses for Future and Current Teachers]. Biologie. Chemie. Zeměpis, 28(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14712/25337556.2019.2.5
- Kuiper, W., & Berkvens, J. (Eds.). (2013). Balancing curriculum regulation and freedom across Europe. CIDREE. http://www.cidree.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/yb_13_balancing_curriculum_regulation_and_freedom.pdf
- Lee, Y.-J., Kim, M., Jin, Q., Yoon, H. G., & Matsubara, K. (2017). East-Asian Primary Science Curricula: An Overview Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Springer Nature.
- Lee, Y.-J., Kim, M., & Yoon, H.-G. (2015). The Intellectual Demands of the Intended Primary Science Curriculum in Korea and Singapore: An analysis based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2193–2213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1072290
- Lees, M. (2016). Estonian Education System 1990–2016. Reforms and their impact. http://4liberty.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Estonian-Education-System_1990-2016.pdf
- Lewis, E. B. (2008). Content is Not Enough: A History of Secondary Earth Science Teacher Preparation with Recommendations for Today. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(5), 445–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/jge_nov2008_lewis_445
- Lokajíčková, V. (2014). Metakognice – Vymezení pojmu a jeho uchopení v kontextu výuky [Metacognition – Definition of the term and its understanding in the context of teaching]. Pedagogika, 64(3), 287–306. https://pages.pedf.cuni.cz/pedagogika/files/2014/12/Ped_2014_3_03_Metakognice_287_306.pdf
- Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis [28 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204
- Meléndez, G., Fermeli, G., & Koutsouveli, A. (2007). Analyzing geology textbooks for secondary school curricula in Greece and Spain: Educational use of geological heritage. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 40(4), 1819–1832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.17143
- MŠMT. (2019). MŠMT: Ministerstvo zjišťovalo stav učitelů v regionálním školství. Retrieved October 21, 2020, from: https://www.msmt.cz/ministerstvo/novinar/ministerstvo-zjistovalo-stav-ucitelu-v-regionalnim-skolstvi?lang=1
- Murdock, J. (2008). Comparison of Curricular Breadth, Depth, and Recurrence and Physics Achievement of TIMSS Population 3 Countries. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1135–1157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701381315
- National curricula for basic schools. (2017). Republic of Estonia. Ministry of Education and Research: National curricula 2014. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from: https://www.hm.ee/en/national-curricula-2014
- OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014): Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science.
- OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education.
- OECD. (2016b). Estonia. PISA 2015 high performers. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-estonia.pdf
- OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do.
- Ormell, C. P. (1974). Bloom’s Taxonomy and the Objectives of Education. Educational Research, 17(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188740170101
- Paasi, A., Harrison, J., & Jones, M. (2018). New consolidated regional geographies. In A. Paasi, J. Harrison, & M. Jones (Eds.), Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories (pp. 1–20). Edward Elgar Pub.
- Pawilen, G. T., & Sumida, M. (2005). A comparative study of the elementary science curriculum of Philippines and Japan. Ehime University Faculty of Education Bulletin, 52(1), 167–180. https://core.ac.uk/reader/71499768
- Popenici, S., & Millar, V. (2015). Writing Learning Outcomes. A practical guide for academics. Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.
- Řezníčková, D. (2009). The transformation of geography education in Czechia. Geografie-Sborník ČGS, 114(4), 316–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2009114040316
- Sefton-Green, J., Nixon, H., & Erstad, O. (2009). Reviewing approaches and perspectives on “Digital literacy”. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800902741556
- SICI. (2016). The Inspectorate of Education of Estonia. Retrieved March 3, 2021, from: https://www.hm.ee/sites/default/files/the_inspectorate_of_education_2016_estonia.pdf
- Simpson, E. J. (1966). The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. University of Illinois.
- Stanny, C. J. (2016). Reevaluating Bloom’s Taxonomy: What Measurable Verbs Can and Cannot Say about Student Learning. Education Sciences, 6(4), 37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040037
- Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Harcourt Brace & World.
- The Framework Educational Programme for Basic Education. (2007). Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport: Basic education. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from: https://www.msmt.cz/areas-of-work/basic-education-1
- Thijs, A., & van den Akker, J. (Eds.). (2009). Curriculum in development. Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling (SLO).
- Tutkun, O. F., Candan, D. G., & Ilhan, H. (2012). Bloom’s Revized Taxonomy and Critics on It. The Online Journal of Counselling and Education, 1(3), 23–30. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dilek-Guezel-Candan/publication/299850265_Bloom's_Revized_Taxonomy_and_Critics_on_It/links/570642eb08aea3d28020cf2c/Blooms-Revized-Taxonomy-and-Critics-on-It.pdf
- Uhlenwinkel, A. (2014). Factual knowledge and conceptual understanding. Geography, 99(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2014.12094388
- Vlček, P., Planinc, T., Svobodová, H., Witzel Clausen, S., Conradsen, K., Hergan, I., Hofmann, E., Ilc Klun, M., Lupač, M., Mužík, V., Ogrin, M., Šeráková, H., Štemberger, V., Trávníček, M., Umek, M., & Volshøj, E. (2016). Integrating Physical Education and Geography. A Case Study of the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Denmark. Masarykova univerzita.
- Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero Gomez, S., & Van den Brande, G. 2016. DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model EUR 27948 EN. Publication Office of the European Union.
- Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Research Monograph No. 6. Council of Chief State School Officers.
- Wei, B. (2020). The change in the intended Senior High School Chemistry Curriculum in China: Focus on intellectual demands. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00115H
- Wei, B., & Ou, Y. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Junior High School Science Curriculum Standards in Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao: Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(8), 1459–1474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9935-6
- Westbury, I., Aspfors, J., Fries, A.-V., Hansèn, S.-E., Ohlhaver, F., Rosenmund, M., & Sivesind, K. (2016). Organizing curriculum change: An introduction . Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(6), 729–743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1186736
- Wilks, J., & Pendergast, D. (2017). Skills for Life: First Aid and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Schools. Health Education Journal, 76(8), 1009–1023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896917728096
- Wojniak, J., & Majorek, M. (2018). Polish education system under 2017 reform: Assumptions, aims and controversies. SHS Web of Conferences, 48(3), 01043. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184801043
- Yaz, Ö. V., & Kurnaz, M. A. (2020). Comparative Analysis of the Science Teaching Curricula in Turkey. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899432