Publication Cover
Educational Psychology
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology
Volume 40, 2020 - Issue 9: Technology-enhanced Learning and Assessment
772
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Technology-enhanced learning and research using databases in higher education: the application of the ODAS model

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1056-1075 | Received 22 Jun 2018, Accepted 28 Apr 2019, Published online: 15 May 2019

References

  • Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended e-learning system: An extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 1–23. doi:10.14742/ajet.2758
  • Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries (OECD educational working papers). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Burkell, J. (2003). The dilemma of survey nonresponse. Library and Information Science Research, 25(3), 239–263. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00029-X
  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Cheema, J. R., & Skultety, L. S. (2017). Self-efficacy and literacy: A paired difference approach to estimation of over-/under-confidence in mathematics- and science-related tasks. Educational Psychology, 37(6), 652–665. doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1127329
  • Chiu, T. K. F. (2017). Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: A top-down adoption process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 524–537. doi:10.1111/bjet.12432
  • Christensen, K. B., Kreiner, S., & Mesbah, M. (2013). Rasch models in health. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • Del Barrio-García, S., Arquero, J. L., & Romero-Frías, E. (2015). Personal learning environments acceptance model: The role of need for cognition, e-Learning satisfaction and students’ perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 129–141.
  • Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607–631. doi:10.1023/A:1018705823763
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
  • Gomez, L. E., Arias, B., Verdugo, M. A., & Navas, P. (2012). An outcomes-based assessment of quality of life in social services. Social Indicators Research, 106(1), 81–93. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9794-9
  • Guntern, S., Korpershoek, H., & Van Der Werf, G. (2017). Benefits of personality characteristics and self-efficacy in the perceived academic achievement of medical students. Educational Psychology, 37(6), 733–744. doi:10.1080/01443410.2016.1223277
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2016). The relationship between research self-efficacy, research disposition and publication output. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 347–361. doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1025704
  • Imbens, G., & Angrist, J. (1994). Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467–476. doi:10.2307/295162
  • Islam, A. Y. M. A. (2011). Online database adoption and satisfaction model. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.
  • Islam, A. Y. M. A. (2014). Validation of the technology satisfaction model (TSM) developed in higher education: The application of structural equation modelling. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 10(3), 44–57. doi:10.4018/ijthi.2014070104
  • Islam, A. Y. M. A. (2016). Development and validation of the technology adoption and gratification (TAG) model in higher education: A cross-cultural study between Malaysia and China. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 12(3), 78–105. doi:10.4018/IJTHI.2016070106
  • Islam, A. Y. M. A., Leng, C. H., & Singh, D. (2015). Efficacy of the technology satisfaction model: An empirical study. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 11(2), 45–60. doi:10.4018/ijthi.2015040103
  • Joo, S., & Choi, N. (2016). Understanding users’ continuance intention to use online library resources based on an extended expectation-confirmation model. The Electronic Library, 34(4), 554–571. doi:10.1108/EL-02-2015-0033
  • Khong, J. Z. N., Liem, G. A. D., & Klassen, R. M. (2017). Task performance in small group settings: The role of group members’ self-efficacy and collective efficacy and group’s characteristics. Educational Psychology, 37(9), 1082–1105. doi:10.1080/01443410.2017.1342767
  • Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2003). The Role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning. College & Research Libraries, 64(4), 282–356. doi:10.5860/crl.76.3.359
  • Lee, H., Choi, S. Y., & Kang, Y. S. (2009). Formation of e-satisfaction and repurchase intention: Moderating roles of computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7848–7859. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.005
  • Liu, C., & Huang, Y. (2015). An empirical investigation of computer simulation technology acceptance to explore the factors that affect user intention. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(3), 449–457. doi:10.1007/s10209-015-0402-7
  • MacColl, J. (2010). Library roles in university research assessment. LIBER Quarterly, 20(2), 152–168. doi:10.18352/lq.7984
  • Online Computer Library Center. (2002). How academic librarians can influence students’ web-based information choices (White paper on Information habits of college students). New York, NY: OCLC. Retrieved from https://www.oclc.org/research/news/2002/06-24.html.
  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nielsen & Lydiche.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. doi:10.2307/270723
  • Spector, M. J., & Kim, C. (2014). Technologies for intentional learning: Beyond a cognitive perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 58(1), 9–22. doi:10.1177/0004944113517828
  • Steffens, K., Bannan, B., Dalgarno, B., Bartolomé, A. R., Esteve-González, V., Cela-Ranilla, J. M. (2015). Recent developments in technology-enhanced learning: A critical assessment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12(2), 73–86. doi:10.7238/rusc.v12i2.2453
  • Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124–142. doi:10.1007/s12528-014-9080-3
  • Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479–494. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00010-9
  • University Office of ECNU. (2015). Demographic Statistics of ECNU [Data set]. Retrieved January 5, 2019, from http://www.u-office.ecnu.edu.cn/bc/49/c896a113737/page.htm
  • Vanderlinde, R., Aesaert, K., & Van Braak, J. (2015). Measuring ICT use and contributing conditions in primary schools: ICT use and contributing conditions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1056–1063. doi:10.1111/bjet.12282
  • Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. doi:10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
  • Wu, Y. (2010). Academic Libraries for enhancing the academic output of university. Journal of Modern Information, 30(11), 42–45.
  • Xie, X. (2014). The investigation and analysis of the current situation of college students’ using of electronic resources: Taking the library of East China Normal University as an Example. Library Research, 44(5), 110–114.
  • Yan, W., Deng, S., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Factors influencing the intention to use information service mashups. The Electronic Library, 34(4), 696–716. doi:10.1108/EL-05-2015-0082
  • Zhao, Y. (2013). Correlation analysis between library’s scholarly information and university research competitiveness: An empirical study of 48 universities. Journal of Academic Libraries, 31(1), 21–27.
  • Zhu, J., Kuang, X., Kennedy, K. J., & Mok, M. M. C. (2018). Previous civic experience and Asian adolescents’ expected participation in legal protest: Mediating role of self-efficacy and interest. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(3), 414–431. doi:10.1080/02188791.2018.1493980

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.