2,520
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The inclusion of girls in Chilean mathematics classrooms: gender bias in teacher-student interaction networks (La inclusión de las niñas en las aulas de matemáticas chilenas: sesgo de género en las redes de interacciones profesor-estudiante)

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 623-674 | Received 11 Jan 2019, Accepted 14 Aug 2019, Published online: 07 Aug 2020

References / Referencias

  • Agencia de Calidad de la Educación. (2017). Informe Técnico SIMCE 2017. Santiago: Ministerio de Educación.
  • Agencia de Calidad de la Educación. (2018). Resultados SIMCE. Santiago: Ministerio de Educación.
  • Altermatt, E. R., Jovanovic, J., & Perry, M. (1998). Bias or responsivity? Sex and achievement-level effects on teachers’ classroom questioning practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 516–527.
  • Auwarter, A. E., & Aruguete, M. S. (2008). Effects of student gender and socioeconomic status on teacher perceptions. The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 243–246.
  • Azorín, C., & Ainscow, M. (2018). Guiding schools on their journey towards inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1450900
  • Bassi, M., Blumberg, R. L., & Mateo-Berganza, M. (2016). Under the cloak of invisibility: Gender bias in teaching practices and learning outcomes (Working Paper IADB). Washington, DC: IADB.
  • Black, L., & Radovic, D. (2018). Gendered positions and participation in whole class discussions in the mathematics classroom. In U. Gellert, C. Knipping, & H. Straehler-Pohl (Eds.), Inside the mathematics class (pp. 269–289). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21, 715–730.
  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Canada, K., & Pringle, R. (1995). The role of gender in college classroom interactions: A social context approach. Sociology of Education, 68, 161–186.
  • Charlin, V., Torres, A., & Cayumán, C. (2016). Expectativas de género y logro de estudiantes en TERCE. Midevidencias, 9, 1–8.
  • Cortázar, A., Romo, F., & Vielma, C. (2016). Informes para la Política Educativa nº 11. Santiago: Centro de Políticas Comparadas en Educación, Universidad Diego Portales.
  • Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1–9.
  • den Brok, P., & Levy, J. (2005). Teacher-student relationships in multicultural classes: Reviewing the past, preparing the future. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 72–88.
  • Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M., & Frisvold, D. E. (2010). Survey measures of classroom instruction: Comparing student and teacher reports. Educational Policy, 24, 267–329.
  • DuBois, C., Butts, C. T., McFarland, D., & Smyth, P. (2013). Hierarchical models for relational event sequences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57, 297–309.
  • Duffy, J., Warren, K., & Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom interactions: Gender of teacher, gender of student, and classroom subject. Sex Roles, 45, 579–593.
  • Espinoza, A., & Taut, S. (2016). El rol del género en las interacciones pedagógicas de aulas de matemática chilenas. Psykhe, 25(2), 1c18.
  • Gelber, D., Treviño, E., & Inostroza, P. (2016). Inequidad de Género en los Logros de Aprendizaje en Educación Primaria. ¿Qué nos Puede Decir TERCE? Santiago: UNESCO.
  • Hajovsky, D. B., Mason, B. A., & McCune, L. A. (2017). Teacher-student relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: A longitudinal examination of gender differences. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 119–133.
  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638.
  • Harrop, A., & Swinson, J. (2011). Comparison of teacher talk directed to boys and girls and its relationship to their behaviour in secondary and primary schools. Educational Studies, 37, 115–125.
  • Herrera, M. O., Mathiesen, M. E., Morales, M. G., Proust, P., & Vergara, M. (2006). Actitud del adulto a cargo de la sala cuna hacia el género y su relación con la calidad del ambiente educativo. Estudios Pedagógicos, 32(1), 7–19.
  • Jerome, E. M., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2008). Teacher‐child relationships from kindergarten to sixth grade: Early childhood predictors of teacher‐perceived conflict and closeness. Social Development, 18, 915–945.
  • Jones, S. M., & Dindia, K. (2004). A meta-analytic perspective on sex equity in the classroom. Review of Educational Research, 74, 443–471.
  • Kelly, A. (1988). Gender differences in teacher-pupil interactions: A meta-analytic review. Research in Education, 39, 1–23.
  • Kuklinski, M. R., & Weinstein, R. S. (2001). Classroom and developmental differences in a path model of teacher expectancy effects. Child Development, 72, 1554–1578.
  • Lafrance, M. (1991). School for scandal: Different educational experiences for females and males. Gender and Education, 3, 3–13.
  • Leyva, D., Weiland, C., Barata, M., Yoshikawa, H., Snow, C., Treviño, E., & Rolla, A. (2015). Teacher-child interactions in Chile and their associations with prekindergarten outcomes. Child Development, 86, 781–799.
  • Lim, J., & Meer, J. (2017). The impact of teacher-student gender matches: Random assignment evidence from South Korea. Journal of Human Resources, 52, 979–997.
  • Maldonado-Carreño, C., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2011). Teacher–child relationships and the development of academic and behavioral skills during elementary school: A within- and between-child analysis. Child Development, 82, 601–616.
  • Manzi, J., García, M. R., & Godoy, M. I. (2017). Informe Técnico SEPA, Sistema de Evaluación de Progreso del Aprendizaje. Santiago: MIDE UC, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
  • Manzi, J., González, R., & Sun, Y. (2011). La Evaluación Docente en Chile. Santiago: MIDE UC, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
  • Mashburn, A. J., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Teacher and classroom characteristics associated with teachers’ ratings of prekindergartners’ relationships and behaviors. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 367–380.
  • McCormick, M. P., & O’Connor, E. E. (2015). Teacher-child relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: Does gender matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 502–516.
  • McCormick, M. P., O’Connor, E. E., Cappella, E., & McClowry, S. G. (2013). Teacher–child relationships and academic achievement: A multilevel propensity score model approach. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 611–624.
  • Minasyan, S. (2017). Gendered patterns in teacher-student interaction in EFL classroom: The Greek context. Journal of Language and Education, 3(3), 89–98.
  • Mizala, A. (2018). Género, cultura y desempeño en matemáticas. Anales de la Universidad de Chile, 14, 125–150.
  • Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art – Teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 231–256.
  • OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2016b). Skills matter: Further results from the survey of adult skills. Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Paris: Author.
  • Opdenakker, M. C., Maulana, R., & den Brok, P. J. (2012). Teacher-student interpersonal relationships and academic motivation within one school year: Developmental changes and linkage. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 95–119.
  • Ortega, L., Malmberg, L.-E., & Sammons, P. (2018a). School effects on Chilean children’s achievement growth in language and mathematics: An accelerated growth curve model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29, 308–337.
  • Ortega, L., Malmberg, L.-E., & Sammons, P. (2018b). Teacher effects on Chilean children’s achievement growth: A cross-classified multiple membership accelerated growth curve model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40, 473–501.
  • Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Mintz, S. (2011). CLASS: Classroom assessment scoring system CLASS - Upper elementary manual. Charlottesville, VA: Teachstone.
  • Pianta, R. C. (1992). The student teacher relationship scale. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
  • Radovic, D. (2018). Diferencias de género en rendimiento matemático en Chile: El efecto del nivel socioeconómico y el establecimiento educacional en el bajo rendimiento de las niñas. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 74, 221–242.
  • Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Klein, S. (1991). The issue of gender in elementary and secondary education. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 17, pp. 269–334). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (SERNAM). (2009). Análisis de Género en el Aula (Documento de Trabajo N° 117). Santiago: Servicio Nacional de la Mujer.
  • Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Tagliacollo, V. A., Volpato, G. L., & Pereira, A., Jr. (2010). Association of student position in classroom and school performance. Educational Research, 1, 198–201.
  • Taut, S., Valencia, E., Palacios, D., Santelices, M. V., Jiménez, D., & Manzi, J. (2016). Teacher performance and student learning: Linking evidence from two national assessment programmes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 23, 53–74.
  • Treviño, E., Valdés, H., Castro, M., Costilla, R., Pardo, C., & Donoso Rivas, F. (2010). Factores asociados al logro cognitivo de los estudiantes de América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago: OREALC/UNESCO Santiago-LLECE.
  • Treviño, E., Varela, C., Rodríguez, M., & Straub, C. (2019). Transformar las aulas en Chile: Superar la desconexión entre la enseñanza actual y los modos de aprender de los estudiantes. En A. Carrasco, & L. Flores (Eds.), De la Reforma a la Transformación. Capacidades, Innovaciones y Regulación de la Educación Chilena (pp. 173–216). Santiago: Ediciones UC.
  • UNESCO. (2015a). Tercer Estudio Regional Comparativo y Explicativo: Logros de aprendizajes. Paris: Author.
  • UNESCO. (2015b). Education 2030: Equity and quality with a lifelong learning perspective. Insights from the EFA global monitoring report´s World Inequality Database on Education (WIDE) (Policy Paper No. 20). Paris: Author.
  • UNESCO. (2016). Gender inequality in learning achievement in primary education. What can TERCE tell us? Santiago: Author.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.