Subject matter specific curriculum integration: a quantitative study of finnish student teachers’ integrative content knowledge

References

• Ball, Deborah Loewenberg, Mark Hoover Thames, and Geoffrey Phelps. 2008. “Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5): 389–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Basil. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, Inés. 2020. “The Shifting Boundaries of School Subjects in Contemporary Curriculum Reforms.” Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik 66 (5): 666–689.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Agency of Education. 2016. National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Helsinki: Finnish National Agency of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Agency of Education. 2019. Lukion Opetussuunnitelman Perusteet [National Core Curriculum for General Upper Secondary Schools]. Helsinki: Finnish National Agency of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gitomer, Drew H., and Robert C. Zisk. 2015. “Knowing What Teachers Know.” Review of Research in Education 39 (1): 1–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X14557001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresnigt, Rens, Ruurd Taconis, Hanno van Keulen, Koeno Gravemeijer, and Liesbeth Baartman. 2014. “Promoting Science and Technology in Primary Education: A Review of Integrated Curricula.” Studies in Science Education 50 (1): 47–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.877694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallunki, Veera, Seija Karppinen, and Kauko Komulainen. 2017. “Becoming Animated When Teaching Physics, Crafts and Drama Together: A Multidisciplinary Course for Student-Teachers.” Journal of Education for Teaching 43 (1): 32–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1182373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansanen, Pertti. 2009. “Subject-Matter Didactics as a Central Knowledge Base for Teachers, or Should It Be Called Pedagogical Content Knowledge?” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 17 (1): 29–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360902742845.
   Google Scholar
• Kansanen, Pertti, and Matti Meri. 1999. “The Didactic Relation in the Teaching-Studying-Learning Process.” In Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as the Science(-s) of the Teaching Profession? edited by Brian Hudson, Friedrich Buchberger, Pertti Kansanen, and Helmut Seel, 107–16. Umeå: Thematic Network of Teacher Education in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Hae-Young. 2013. “Statistical Notes for Clinical Researchers: Assessing Normal Distribution (2) Using Skewness and Kurtosis.” Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 38 (1): 52–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavonen, Jari. 2018. “Educating Professional Teachers in Finland through the Continuous Improvement of Teacher Education Programmes.” In Contemporary Pedagogies in Teacher Education and Development, edited by Yehudith Weinberger and Zipora Libman, 3–22. London: IntechOpen. doi:https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77979.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, Karl, and Sarah K. Howard. 2018. “Taking Autonomy Tours: A Key to Integrative Knowledge-Building.” LCT Centre Occasional Paper 1 (June): 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• McPhail, Graham. 2018. “Curriculum Integration in the Senior Secondary School: A Case Study in A National Assessment Context.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 50 (1): 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1386234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhail, Graham. 2019. “Curriculum Integration in Flexible Learning Environments, Challenges for Teachers, and Teacher Education.” In Encyclopedia of Teacher Education, edited by Michael A. Peters. Singapore: Springer https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_369-1#howtocite. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6-369-1.
   Google Scholar
• Niemelä, Mikko A., and Kirsi Tirri. 2018. “Teachers’ Knowledge of Curriculum Integration: A Current Challenge for Finnish Subject Teachers.” In Contemporary Pedagogies in Teacher Education and Development, edited by Yehudith Weinberger and Zipora Libman, 119–132. London: IntechOpen. doi:https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75870.
   Google Scholar
• Niemelä, Mikko A. 2021. “Crossing Curricular Boundaries for Powerful Knowledge.” Curriculum Journal 32 (2): 359–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikitina, Svetlana. 2006. “Three Strategies for Interdisciplinary Teaching: Contextualizing, Conceptualizing, and Problem-Centring.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 38 (3): 251–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500422632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perignat, Elaine, and Jen Katz-Buonincontro. 2019. “STEAM in Practice and Research: An Integrative Literature Review.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 31: 31–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saloviita, Timo. 2019. “Outcomes of Teacher Education in Finland: Subject Teachers Compared with Primary Teachers.” Journal of Education for Teaching 45 (3): 322–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1599504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee S. 2004. “Disciplines of Inquiry in Education: A New Overview.” In The Wisdom of Practice, edited by Suzanne M Wilson, 276–307. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, Mary L., and Joseph S. Krajcik. 1990. “Concept Maps as a Heuristic for Science Curriculum Development: Toward Improvement in Process and Product.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 (10): 987–1000. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660271007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund, Per, Niklas Gericke, and Gabriel Bladh. 2020. “Educational Content in Cross-Curricular ESE Teaching and A Model to Discern Teacher’s Teaching Traditions.” Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 14 (1): 78–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408220930706.
   Google Scholar
• Tani, Sirpa. 2014. “Geography in the Finnish School Curriculum: Part of the Success Story?” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 23 (1): 90–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2013.858457.
   Google Scholar
• Vitikka, Erja, Leena Krokfors, and Leila Rikabi. 2016. “The Finnish National Core Curriculum: Design and Development.” In Miracle of Education: The Principles and Practices of Teaching and Learning in Finnish Schools, edited by Hannele Niemi, Auli Toom, and Arto Kallioniemi, 83–90. 2nd ed. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ylijoki, Oili-Helena. 2000. “Disciplinary Cultures and the Moral Order of Studying - A Case-Study of Four Finnish University Departments.” Higher Education 39 (3): 339–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003920230873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar