Secondary teachers’ views about teaching and assessing the diversity of scientific methods in practical science

References

• Abrahams, I., M. J. Reiss, and R. M. Sharpe. 2013. “The Assessment of Practical Work in School Science.” Studies in Science Education 49 (2): 209–251. doi:10.1080/03057267.2013.858496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., and M. Saglam. 2010. “A Study of Teachers’ Views on Practical Work in Secondary Schools in England and Wales.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (6): 753–768. doi:10.1080/09500690902777410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., and R. Millar. 2008. “Does Practical Work Really Work? A Study of the Effectiveness of Practical Work as A Teaching and Learning Method in School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (14): 1945–1969. doi:10.1080/09500690701749305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I. 2009. “Does Practical Work Really Motivate? A Study of the Affective Value of Practical Work in Secondary School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (17): 2335–2353. doi:10.1080/09500690802342836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I. 2011. Practical Work in Secondary Science: A Minds-on Approach. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., and D. Wall. 1993. “Does Washback Exist?” Applied Linguistics 14 (2): 115–129. doi:10.1093/applin/14.2.115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, J. 2009. “How Science Textbooks Treat Scientific Method: A Philosopher’s Perspective.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2): 303–344. doi:10.1093/bjps/axp011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, R. N. 1994. “Theory and Experiment in Evolutionary Biology.” Synthese 99 (1): 59–73. doi:10.1007/BF01064530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative research in psychology 3(2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, A., and J. A. Baird. 2020. “General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) and the Assessment of Science Practical Work: An Historical Review of Assessment Policy.” The Curriculum Journal 31 (3): 357–378. doi:10.1002/curj.20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. 1990. “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria”. Qualitative Sociology 13(1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane, A., S. Erduran, and S. J. Wooding. 2019. “Investigating the Diversity of Scientific Methods in High-stakes Chemistry Examinations in England.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (16): 2201–2217. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1666216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2014. The national curriculum in England: Science programmes of study: key stage 4 Retrieved10 July 2021. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/381380/Science_KS4_PoS_7_November_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. 2008. A Review of the Research on Practical Work in School Science (London: King‘s College London)Retrieved10 July 2021 https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/54871393/saliha23-with-cover-page-v2.pdf?Expires=1637801228&Signature=YKnD~BX3gmbXU-SgOcN7C2HBbHpnzyaJuuyfM0WCl7E754tbVzRpYV0FGduOLWaFnP-knXM~K~E4u9kbsyrMfDIB3Qv4-6edGGNi1-ik9zfeu2KrFN7eaSU71UHoVsq5FZzamGBnEx5j6YrkFdDlLXlX~jF7mnkBxDASeLkZk-6WABSgp1wBFOxMEM1TO~MUV~-W0qN2D3wLbKTUQXw76XIXtteE73iYRQtP-ePCQt9UmSJy-0IFNSWgFZwLdHTdHDbZzcjDAavla1WoVg~2b8PDdfHOwImJQ0GaUB9dlmgsKs3b0GMHl3xrdmtobAWslutGIuWNY3w12FQUbSaZRg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA .
   Google Scholar
• El Masri, Y. H., S. Erduran, and O. Ioannidou. 2021. “Designing Practical Science Assessments in England: Students’ Engagement and Perceptions.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–21. doi:10.1080/02635143.2021.1872519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., A. Childs, and J. A. Baird. 2020. “Practical Science and Pandemics [Blog Post]”. Retrieved from https://www.bera.ac.uk/blog/practical-science-and-pandemics, April 20th Accessed10 July 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Y. El Masri, A. Cullinane, and Y. P. D. Ng. 2020. “Assessment of Practical Science in High Stakes Examinations: A Qualitative Analysis of High Performing English-speaking Countries.” International Journal of Science Education 1–24. doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1769876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., and Z. R. Dagher. 2014. In Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education: Scientific Knowledge, Practices and Other Family Categories. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S, and Wooding, S. 2021. A Project Calibrate Approach to Summative Assessment of Practical Science School Science Review 102 381, 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., O, Ioannidou, & J. A. Baird. 2021. “The impact of epistemic framing of teaching videos and summative assessments on students’ learning of scientific methods.” International Journal of Science Education 43 (18): 2885–2910. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1998717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, 2021. “Enhancing the Summative Assessment of Practical Science: A Systemic Approach”. Project Calibrate Final Report Retrieved10 July 2021. Available at: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3e3640c2-cbb9-4fca-8664-3cf6fbaab202
   Google Scholar
• Gatsby. 2017. Good Practical Science Retrieved10 July 2021. Available at: https://www.gatsby.org.uk/uploads/education/reports/pdf/good-practical-science-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. S., and L. L. Davis. 1997. “Selection and Use of Content Experts for Instrument Development.” Research in Nursing & Health 20 (3): 269–274. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 1996. “Practical Work in School Science: Exploring Some Directions for Change.” International Journal of Science Education 18 (7): 755–760. doi:10.1080/0950069960180702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 2004. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty‐first Century.” Science Education 88 (1): 28–54. doi:10.1002/sce.10106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A. 1988. “Practical Work and Science Education II.” Development and Dilemmas in Science Education 23: 189.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidou O and Erduran S. (2021). Beyond Hypothesis Testing. Sci & Educ, 30(2), 345–364. 10.1007/s11191-020-00185-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H., and A. Al-Shuaili. 2001. “Conversion of Bench Demonstration Using the Overhead projector/Conversión de Demostraciones En El Aula Utilizando Retroproyector.” Journal of Science Education 2 (2): 78.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, J. F., H. F. Boulind, and M. J. Rolls. 1963. Practical Work in School Science: An Account of an Inquiry … into the Nature and Purpose of Practical Work in School Science Teaching in England and Wales (Leicester: Leicester University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, J. F. 1964. Practical Work in School Science: An Account of an Inquiry Sponsored by the Gulbenkian Foundation into the Nature and Purpose of Practical Work in School Science Teaching in England and Wales. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layton, D. 1973. Science for the People: The Origins of the School Science Curriculum in England. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, R. 1988. “A History of Practical Work in School Science and Its Assessment, 1860-1986.” School Science Review 69 (250): 115–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lunetta, V. N., A. Hofstein, and M. P. Clough. 2007. “Learning and Teaching in the School Science Laboratory: An Analysis of Research, Theory, and Practice.” Handbook of Research on Science Education 2: 393–441.
   Google Scholar
• Medawar, P. B. 1978. “Is the Scientific Paper Fraudulent? Yes; It Misrepresents Scientific Thought.” Current Medical Attorney 26 (101): 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (MOE). Ministry of Science and ICT (MSICT), & Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (KOFAC). 2019. Scientific Literacy for All Koreans: Korean Science Education Standards for the Next Generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (MOE). 2018. Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education: Science. Taipei: MOE.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Accessed July 10, 2021. https://www.nextgenscience.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual. 2015. Assessment of Practical Work in GCSE Science: Analysis of Consultation Responses. Coventry: Ofqual.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. 2017a. GCSE (9-1) Geography B Accessed10 July 2021. Available at: https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/GCSE/Geography-B/2016/teaching-and-learning-materials/Fieldwork-Guid
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. 2017b. INTERNATIONAL GCSE Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Human Biology Accessed10 July 2021 https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/International%20GCSE/Biology/017/teaching-and-learningmaterials/Practical_terminology_in_Int_GCSE_Science.pdf. Available at: https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/International%20GCSE/Biology/017/teaching-and-learningmaterials/Practical_terminology_in_Int_GCSE_Science.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pekmez, E. S., P. Johnson, and R. Gott. 2005. “Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature and Purpose of Practical Work.” Research in Science & Technological Education 23 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1080/02635140500068401.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M. J., I. Bilgen, C. McClain, and B. Hunscher. 2017. “Effective Sampling from Social Media Sites and Search Engines for Web Surveys: Demographic and Data Quality Differences in Surveys of Google and Facebook Users.” Social Science Computer Review 35 (6): 713–732. doi:10.1177/0894439316683344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., C. Teddlie, and C. B. Teddlie. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Vol. 46. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. 1998. “Practical Work in Science.” Practical Work in School Science: Which Way Now 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wivagg, D., and D. Allchin. 2002. “The Dogma of “The” Scientific Method.” The American Biology Teacher 64 (9): 645–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, B. 2013.“The Scientific Method on Trial”. Paper presented at the International History and Philosophy in Science Teaching biennial meeting, Pittsburgh, PA. http://archive.ihpst.net/2013-pittsburgh/conference-proceedings/ Accessed12 July 2021
   Google Scholar
• Wooding, S., A. Cullinane, and S. Erduran. 2020. Supporting the Teaching of Scientific Methods in Practical Science. doi:10.5287/bodleian:xqvKxnmnX Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar