Profiles of teachers’ assessment techniques and their students’ involvement in assessment

References

• Andrade, H., and Y. Du. 2007. “Student Responses to Criteria‐Referenced Self‐Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (2): 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928.
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M., H. Kimron, and H. Shilton. 2011. “Nested Contexts That Shape Assessment for Learning: School-Based Professional Learning Community and Classroom Culture.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. J., and D. Wiliam. 1998. Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. London, UK: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C., R. Burton, F. van der Kleij, C. Ablaza, A. Carroll, J. Hattie, and S. Neill. 2021. “Teachers Activating Learners: The Effects of a Student-Centred Feedback Approach on Writing Achievement.” Teaching and Teacher Education 105:103387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauley, K. M., and J. H. McMillan. 2010. “Formative Assessment Techniques to Support Student Motivation and Achievement.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues & Ideas 83 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903267784.
   Google Scholar
• Christoforidou, M., and L. Kyriakides. 2021. “Developing Teacher Assessment Skills: The Impact of the Dynamic Approach to Teacher Professional Development.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 70:101051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoforidou, M., L. Kyriakides, P. Antoniou, and B. P. Creemers. 2014. “Searching for Stages of teacher’s Skills in Assessment.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 40:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah, New Jersey, USA: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Foundation. 2018. “Hoe weet ik waar mijn leerlingen staan [How do I know what the learning process of my students is]?” https://www.slo.nl/publish/pages/11974/fe_hoe_weet_ik_waar_zij_staan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Inspectorate of Education. 2018. De Staat van het Onderwijs: Onderwijsverslag 2016/2017. [The Status of Education: Educational Report 2016/2017]. Inspectie van het Onderwijs. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/documenten/rapporten/2018/04/11/rapport-de-staat-van-het-onderwijs.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. 2020. “Besluit bekwaamheidseisen onderwijspersoneel [Decree on Competence Requirements for Teaching Staff].” https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0018692/2020-08-01.
   Google Scholar
• Flemish Inspectorate of Education. 2021. Jaarlijks rapport van de onderwijsinspectie: Onderwijsspiegel 2021. [Annual Report of the Education Inspectorate: Education Mirror 2021]. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.be/sites/default/files/atoms/files/OS2021-web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Flemish Ministry of Education and Training. 2018. “Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering betreffende de basiscompetenties van de leraren [Decision of the Flemish Government Regarding the Basic Competences of Teachers].” https://codex.vlaanderen.be/Zoeken/Document.aspx?DID=1029484m=inhoud.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2018. “Triangulation in Data Collection.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection, edited by U. Flick, 527–544. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W., and D. Cisterna. 2022. “Formative Assessment Practice Progressions for Teacher Preparation: A Framework and Illustrative Case.” Teaching and Teacher Education 110:103601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., and M. James. 1997. “Assessment and Learning: Differences and Relationships Between Formative and Summative Assessment.” Assessment in Education 4 (3): 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594970040304.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitink, M. C., F. M. Van der Kleij, B. P. Veldkamp, K. Schildkamp, and W. B. Kippers. 2016. “A Systematic Review of Prerequisites for Implementing Assessment for Learning in Classroom Practice.” Educational Research Review 17:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempen, B., and M. Vanleke. 2013. “Education in Flanders.” In Exploring Childhood in a Comparative Context: An Introductory Guide for Students, edited by M. A. Brown and J. White, 16–27. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M., J. Kim, T. Vendlinski, and J. Herman. 2009. “From Evidence to Action: A Seamless Process in Formative Assessment?” Educational Measurement Issues & Practice 28 (3): 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x.
   Google Scholar
• Joosten-ten Brinke, D., R. Bartman, J. Gulikers, G. Van Silfhout, L. Baartman, M. Leenknecht, J. Arts, C. De Koster, and N. Kok. 2022. “Formatief evalueren in de lerarenopleidingen. Een analyse van de kennisbases [Formative Evaluation in Teacher Education. An Analysis of the Knowledge Bases].” Tijdschrift voor Lerarenopleiders 43 (2). www.velon.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Kippers, W. B., C. H. D. Wolterinck, K. Schildkamp, C. L. Poortman, and A. J. Visscher. 2018. “Teachers’ Views on the Use of Assessment for Learning and Data-Based Decision Making in Classroom Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 75:199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., and K. Schildkamp. 2021. “Misconceptions About Data-Based Decision Making in Education: An Exploration of the Literature.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 69:100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortelmans, D. 2013. Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden [Qualitative research methods handbook]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• National Foundation for Educational Research. 2007. “National Foundation for Educational Research Position Paper on Assessment.” https://www.nfer.ac.uk/nferposition-paper-on-assessment-2007.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. MacFarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., and W. Kuiper. 2012. “Balancing Curriculum Freedom and Regulation in the Netherlands.” European Educational Research Journal 11 (3): 357–368. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.357.
   Google Scholar
• Nusche, D., H. Braun, G. H. Halász, and P. Santiago. 2014. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Netherlands 2014. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nusche, D., G. Miron, P. Santiago, and R. Teese. 2015. OECD Reviews of School Resources: Flemish Community of Belgium 2015. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. “How Decentralised Are Education Systems, and What Does it Mean for Schools?” Education Indicators in Focus, No. 64. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e14575d5-en.
   Google Scholar
• Sach, E. 2013. “An Exploration of Teachers’ Narratives: What Are the Facilitators and Constraints Which Promote or Inhibit ‘Good’ Formative Assessment Practices in Schools?” International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 43 (3): 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2013.813956.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., F. M. van der Kleij, M. C. Heitink, W. B. Kippers, and B. P. Veldkamp. 2020. “Formative Assessment: A Systematic Review of Critical Teacher Prerequisites for Classroom Practice.” International Journal of Educational Research 103:101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suurtam, C. 2012. “Assessment Can Support Reasoning & Sense Making.” The Mathematics Teacher 106 (1): 28–33. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.106.1.0028.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, S. Y. F., M. M. H. Cheng, and W. W. M. So. 2006. “Supporting Student teachers’ Professional Learning with Standards-Referenced Assessment.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 34 (2): 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660600720629.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gasse, R., K. Vanlommel, J. Vanhoof, and P. Van Petegem. 2017. “The Impact of Collaboration on teachers’ Individual Data Use.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 28 (3): 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1321555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vattøy, K. D., S. M. Gamlem, and W. M. Rogne. 2021. “Examining students’ Feedback Engagement and Assessment Experiences: A Mixed Study.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (11): 2325–2337. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1723523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, W., T. Schwartz, S. Hoekstra, and M. Kleinjan. 2021. “Druk in het voortgezet onderwijs: onderzoek naar schooldruk in het voortgezet onderwijs [Pressure in secondary education: research into school pressure in secondary education].” https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/rapporten/2021/06/30/druk-in-het-voortgezet-onderwijs/druk-in-het-voortgezet-onderwijs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. S., and M. Priestley. 2011. “Teacher Beliefs and the Mediation of Curriculum Innovation in Scotland: A Socio-Cultural Perspective on Professional Development and Change.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 43 (3): 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.563447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2011. “What Is Assessment for Learning?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., and S. Leahy. 2016. Embedding Formative Assessment. Cheltenham VIC, Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., and G. T. L. Brown. 2021. “Assessment for Learning in the Hong Kong Assessment Reform: A Case of Policy Borrowing.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 68:100985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., Z. Li, E. Panadero, M. Yang, L. Yang, and H. Lao. 2021. “A Systematic Review on Factors Influencing teachers’ Intentions and Implementations Regarding Formative Assessment.” Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice 28 (3): 228–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1884042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, X., and G. Buck. 2019. “Using a Collaborative Action Research Approach to Negotiate an Understanding of Formative Assessment in an Era of Accountability Testing.” Teaching and Teacher Education 80:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar