Storylines in the physics teaching content of an upper secondary school classroom

References

• Alexopoulou, E., and R. Driver. 1996. “Small-Group Discussion in Physics: Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (10): 1099–1114. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderhag, P., P. Emanuelsson, P.-O. Wickman, and K. M. Hamza. 2013. “Students’ Choice of Post-Compulsory Science: In Search of Schools that Compensate for the Socio-Economic Background of Their Students.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (18): 3141–3160. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.696738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderhag, P., K. M. Hamza, and P.-O. Wickman. 2015. “What Can a Teacher Do to Support Students’ Interest in Science? a Study of the Constitution of Taste in a Science Classroom.” Research in Science Education 45 (4): 749–784. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9448-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderhag, P., P. O. Wickman, and K. M. Hamza. 2015. “Signs of Taste for Science: A Methodology for Studying the Constitution of Interest in the Science Classroom.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 10 (2): 339–368. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9641-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. T. 2009. “Applying Positioning Theory to the Analysis of Classroom Interactions: Mediating Micro-Identities, Macro-Kinds, and Ideologies of Knowing.” Linguistics and Education 20 (4): 291–310. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2009.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, S., and A. Johansson. 2016. “Gender Gap or Program Gap? Students’ Negotiations of Study Practice in a Course in Electromagnetism.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (2): 020112. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., E. Dawson, J. DeWitt, S. Godec, H. King, A. Mau, E. Nomikou, and A. Seakins. 2017. “Killing Curiosity? an Analysis of Celebrated Identity Performances among Teachers and Students in Nine London Secondary Science Classrooms.” Science Education 101 (5): 741–764. doi:10.1002/sce.2017.101.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., E. Dawson, A. Seakins, J. DeWitt, S. Godec, and C. Whitby. 2016. “‘I’m Being a Man Here’: Urban Boys’ Performances of Masculinity and Engagement with Science during a Science Museum Visit.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 25 (3): 438–485. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1187147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, and B. Willis. 2014. “Adolescent Boys’ Science Aspirations: Masculinity, Capital, and Power.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1002/tea.21122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. 2012. “Science Students’ Classroom Discourse: Tasha’s Umwelt.” Research in Science Education 42 (2): 233–259. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9195-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., H. Kang, E. Tan, T. B. O’Neill, J. Bautista-Guerra, and C. Brecklin. 2013. “Crafting a Future in Science: Tracing Middle School Girls’ Identity Work over Time and Space.” American Educational Research Journal 50 (1): 37–75. doi:10.3102/0002831212458142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., E. Tan, and A. Rivet. 2008. “Creating Hybrid Spaces for Engaging School Science among Urban Middle School Girls.” American Educational Research Journal 45 (1): 68–103. doi:10.3102/0002831207308641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, M. 2017. “The Role of Humor in Learning Physics: A Study of Undergraduate Students.” Research in Science Education 47 (2): 427–450. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9508-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, M., and A. T. Danielsson. 2013. “Characterising Learning Interactions: A Study of University Students Solving Physics Problems in Groups.” Research in Science Education 43 (3): 1177–1196. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9307-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, M., A. T. Danielsson, and Å. Ingerman. 2012. “Different Stories of Group Work: Exploring Problem Solving in Engineering Education.” Nordic Studies in Science Education 8 (1): 3–16. doi:10.5617/nordina.355.
   Google Scholar
• Bøe, M. V., and E. K. Henriksen. 2013. “Love It or Leave It: Norwegian Students’ Motivations and Expectations for Postcompulsory Physics.” Science Education 97 (4): 550–573. doi:10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickhouse, N. W. 2001. “Embodying Science: A Feminist Perspective on Learning.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (3): 282–295. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickhouse, N. W., P. Lowery, and K. Schultz. 2000. “What Kind of Girl Does Science? the Construction of School Science Identities.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (5): 441–458. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B. 2004. “The Cultural Production of Science in Reform-Based Physics: Girls’ Access, Participation, and Resistance.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (4): 392–414. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., C. M. Scott, and C. Lowder. 2014. “Becoming (Less) Scientific: A Longitudinal Study of Students’ Identity Work from Elementary to Middle School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (7): 836–869. doi:10.1002/tea.21150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., A. W. Webb, L. Archer, and M. Taylor. 2015. “What Kind of Boy Does Science? A Critical Perspective on the Science Trajectories of Four Scientifically Talented Boys.” Science Education 99 (3): 438–464. doi:10.1002/sce.2015.99.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. 1993. “Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Intuitions to Deal with Students’ Preconceptions in Physics.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (10): 1241–1257. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., and R. Harré. 1990. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1111/jtsb.1990.20.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSessa, A. 2015. “Alternative Conceptions and P-Prims.” In Encyclopedia of Science Education., edited by R. Gunstone, 34–37. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Due, K. 2014. “Who Is the Competent Physics Student? A Study of Students’ Positions and Social Interaction in Small-Group Discussions.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 9 (2): 441–459. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9441-z.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, J. M. 1995. “On the Continuity of Power Relations in Pedagogy.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 5 (2): 165–188. doi:10.1080/0962021950050203.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson, D. 1994. “Concept Substitution: An Instructional Strategy for Promoting Conceptual Change.” Research in Science Education 24 (1): 102–111. doi:10.1007/BF02356334.
   Google Scholar
• Gyberg, P., and F. Lee. 2010. “The Construction of Facts: Preconditions for Meaning in Teaching Energy in Swedish Classrooms.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (9): 1173–1189. doi:10.1080/09500690902984800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglund, J., F. Jeppsson, and K. J. Schönborn. 2016. “Taking on the Heat: A Narrative Account of How Infrared Cameras Invite Instant Inquiry.” Research in Science Education 46 (5): 685–713. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9476-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, R. 1998. “Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66 (1): 64–74. doi:10.1119/1.18809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R., F. M. Moghaddam, T. P. Cairnie, D. Rothbart, and S. R. Sabat. 2009. “Recent Advances in Positioning Theory.” Theory and Psychology 19 (1): 5–31. doi:10.1177/0959354308101417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R., and L. van Langenhove. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, C. 2002. “Gender Diversity in Play with Physics: The Problem of Premises for Participation in Activities.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 9 (4): 250–269. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0904_02.
   Google Scholar
• Hazari, Z., C. Cass, and C. Beattie. 2015. “Obscuring Power Structures in the Physics Classroom: Linking Teacher Positioning, Student Engagement, and Physics Identity Development.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (6): 735–762. doi:10.1002/tea.v52.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazari, Z., G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M. C. Shanahan. 2010. “Connecting High School Physics Experiences, Outcome Expectations, Physics Identity, and Physics Career Choice: A Gender Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (8): 978–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, P., and M. Hollabaugh. 1992. “Teaching Problem Solving through Cooperative Grouping. Part 2: Designing Problems and Structuring Groups.” American Journal of Physics 60 (7): 637–644. doi:10.1119/1.17118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., D. Wagner, K. R. Johnson, H. Suh, and H. Figueras. 2015. “Positioning in Mathematics Education: Revelations on an Imported Theory.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 89 (2): 185–204. doi:10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. 2007. “Comparing Different Traditions of Teaching and Learning: What Can We Learn about Teaching and Learning?” European Educational Research Journal 6 (2): 135–146. doi:10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.135.
   Google Scholar
• Juuti, K., and J. Lavonen. 2016. “How Teaching Practices are Connected to Student Intention to Enrol in Upper Secondary School Physics Courses.” Research in Science & Technological Education 34 (2): 204–218. doi:10.1080/02635143.2015.1124848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laux, K. 2018. “A Theoretical Understanding of the Literature on Student Voice in the Science Classroom.” Research in Science & Technological Education 36 (1): 111–129. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1353963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, E., J. Almqvist, and L. Östman. 2009. “Epistemological Norms and Companion Meanings in Science Classroom Communication.” Science Education 93 (5): 859–874. doi:10.1002/sce.v93:5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., P. Fensham, and S. Chaiklin. 1994. “A Nobel’s Eye View of Scientific Intuition: Discussions with the Nobel Prize-Winners in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine (1970–86).” International Journal of Science Education 16 (4): 457–473. doi:10.1080/0950069940160406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendick, H., M. Berge, and A. T. Danielsson. 2017. “A Critique of the Stem Pipeline: Young People’s Identities in Sweden and Science Education Policy.” British Journal of Educational Studies 65 (4): 481–497. doi:10.1080/00071005.2017.1300232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, and J. K. Staarman. 2009. “Dialogic Teaching in the Primary Science Classroom.” Language and Education 23 (4): 353–369. doi:10.1080/09500780902954273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., and P. H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyström, E. 2007. “Talking and Taking Positions: An Encounter between Action Research and the Gendered and Racialised Discourses of School Science.” (Dissertation), Umeå University, Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• Östman, L. 1998. “How Companion Meanings are Expressed by Science Education Discourse.” In Problems of Meaning in Science Curriculum. Ways of Knowing in Science Series, edited by D. A. Roberts and L. Östman. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. 54-70.
   Google Scholar
• Redish, E. F. 1994. “Implications of Cognitive Studies for Teaching Physics.” American Journal of Physics 62 (9): 796–803. doi:10.1119/1.17461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. M. 2002. “Student Positioning within Groups during Science Activities.” Research in Science Education 32 (1): 35–54. doi:10.1023/A:1015046621428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., E. F. Mortimer, and O. G. Aguiar. 2006. “The Tension between Authoritative and Dialogic Discourse: A Fundamental Characteristic of Meaning Making Interactions in High School Science Lessons.” Science Education 90 (4): 605–631. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavinina, L. V. 2004. “Explaining High Abilities of Nobel Laureates.” High Ability Studies 15 (2): 243–254. doi:10.1080/1359813042000314808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, C. 2002. “When Physical Intuition Fails.” American Journal of Physics 70 (11): 1103–1109. doi:10.1119/1.1512659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siorenta, A., and A. Jimoyiannis. 2008. “Physics Instruction in Secondary Schools: An Investigation of Teachers’ Beliefs Towards Physics Laboratory and ICT.” Research in Science & Technological Education 26 (2): 185–202. doi:10.1080/02635140802037328.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, B. A. 2003. “Recent Advances in Classroom Physics.” Reports on Progress in Physics 66 (10): 1833–1864. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/66/10/R07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K., and J. J. Gallagher. 1987. “The Role of Target Students in the Science Classroom.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24 (1): 61–75. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O. 2006. Aesthetic Experience in Science Education: Learning and Meaning-Making as Situated Talk and Action. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar