Informing Stylistic Learning Behavior, Disposition, and Achievement Through Ability Subtests — Or, More Illusions of Meaning?

References

• American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Clemans, W. V. (1965). An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measures. Psychometric Monographs (No. 14).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., & Nagel, N. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
   Google Scholar
• Conger, A. J., Conger, J. C., Farrell, A. D., & Ward, D. (1979). What can the WISC-R measure? Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 431–436.
   Google Scholar
• Education of All Handicapped Children Act. (1977). 20 U.S.C. § 1401, 1414.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, C. D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales introductory and technical handbook. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1988). Generality of test-session observations to kindergartners' classroom behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 527–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1990a). Patterns and prevalence of core profile types in the WPPSI standardization sample. School Psychology Review, 19, 471–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1990b). Score structures and applications of core profile types in the McCarthy scales standardization sample. Journal of Special Education, 24, 212–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glutting, J. J., McDermott, P. A., & Konold, T. R. (1997). Ontology, structure, and diagnostic benefits of a normative subtest taxonomy from the WISC-III standardization sample. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 349–372). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Glutting, J. J., McGrath, E. A., Kamphaus, R. W, & McDermott, P. A. (1992). Taxonomy and validity of subtest profiles on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Journal of Special Education, 26, 85–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glutting, J. J., & Oakland, T. (1993). Guide to the assessment of test session behavior. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Glutting, J. J., Oakland, T., & McDermott, P. A. (1989). Observing child behavior during testing: Constructs, validity, and situational generality. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnys, J. A., Willis, W. G., & Faust, D. (1995). School psychologists' diagnoses of learning disabilities: A study of illusory correlation. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, R. L. (1979). The utility of WISC-R subtest scores in discriminating among adequate and underachieving children. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, A. M., & McDermott, P. A. (1996). Discovering core profile types in the school-age standardization sample of the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamphaus, R. W. (1993). Clinical assessment of children's intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufinan, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B., Snyder, J., & Castellanos, M. (1996). Lessons from the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC): Toward a new cognitive assessment model. Psychological Assessment, 8, 7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B., Snyder, J., Guilmette, S., & Castellanos, M. (1992, August). WISC-R, K-ABC, and Stanford-Bi-net profile variability: Another validity cul-de-sac. Paper presented at the Centennial Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. A. (1984). Comparative functions of preschool learning style and IQ in predicting future academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. A. (1994). National profiles in youth psychopathology: Manual of Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents. Philadelphia, PA: Edumetric and Clinical Science.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. A., & Beitman, B. S. (1984). Standardization of a scale for the Study of Children's Learning Styles: Structure, stability, and criterion validity. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W, & Glutting, J. J. (1990). Just say no to subtest analysis: A critique on Wechsler's theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 290–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., & Baggaley, A. R. (1992). Illusions of meaning in the ipsative assessment of children's ability. Journal of Special Education, 25, 504–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. A., Glutting, J. J., Jones, J. N., & Noonan, J. V. (1989). Ttypology and prevailing composition of core profiles in the WAIS-R standardization sample. Psychological Assessment, 1, 118–125.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. A., Glutting, J. J., Jones, J. N., Watkins, M. W., & Rush, J. (1989). Core profile types in the WISC-R national sample: Structure, membership, and applications. Psychological Assessment, 1, 292–299.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. A., Green, L. F., Francis, J. M., & Stott, D. H. (1996). Learning Behaviors Scale. Philadelphia, PA: Edumetric and Clinical Science.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (1994). Clinical interpretation of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability-Revised. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1973). Why I do not attend case conferences. In P. E. Meehl (Ed.), Psychodiagnosis: Selected readings (pp. 225–301). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moffit, T. E., Caspi, A., Harkness, A. R., & Silva, P. A. (1993). The natural history of change in intellectual performance: Who changes? How much? Is it meaningful? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 455–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Psychological Corporation. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. San Antonio, TX: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, J. A. (1963). Some properties of ipsative score matrices and their relevance for some current interest tests. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children. San Diego, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Saville, P., & Wilson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 219–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stott, D. H., McDermott, P. A., Green, L. F., & Francis, J. M. (1988). Learning Behaviors Scale and Study of Children's Learning Behaviors research edition manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1988). Current population survey [Machine-readable data file]. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Current population survey [Machine-readable data file]. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (1989). Eleventh annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. W., & Kush, J. C. (1988). Micro-CONGRU: A computer program for measuring levels of overall and partial congruence among multiple observers on nominal scales. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 513–514.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. W., & Kush, J. C. (1994). Wechsler subtest analysis: The right way, the wrong way, or no way? School Psychology Review, 23, 640–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar