Conceptualising variety in challenge-based learning in higher education: the CBL-compass

References

• Arrambide-Leal, E. J., E. J. Lara-Prieto, R. M. García-García, and J. Membrillo-Hernández. 2019. “Impact of Active and Challenge Based Learning with First Year Engineering Students: Mini Drag Race Challenge.” 2019 IEEE 11th international conference on engineering education (ICEED), Kanazawa, Japan, 2019, 20–25. doi:10.1109/ICEED47294.2019.8994939.
   Google Scholar
• Bailin, S. 2002. “Critical Thinking and Science Education.” Science & Education 11: 361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, N., and B. G. Wilson. 2007. Learning by design: Teachers and students as co-creators of knowledge. Educational Technology: Opportunities and Challenges. Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu, 30:51.
   Google Scholar
• Baloian, N., K. Hoeksema, U. Hoppe, and M. Milrad. 2006. “Technologies and Educational Activities for Supporting and Implementing Challenge-Based Learning.” In International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 210, Education for the 21” Century-Impact of ICT and Digital Resources, edited by D. Kumar and J. Turner, 7–16. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, F. V., M. Nichols, S. Reinehr, and A. Malucelli. 2017. “Challenge Based Learning Applied to Mobile Software Development Teaching.” Paper presented at the 30th IEEE conference on software engineering education and training, Savannah, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Bocconi, S., P. Kampylis, and Y. Punie. 2012. “Innovating Teaching and Learning Practices: Key Elements for Developing Creative Classrooms in Europe.” eLearning Papers 30: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., and S. Cutler. 2010. “Constructive Alignment of Interdisciplinary Graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Science: An Analysis of Successful IGERT Proposals.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (4): 355–369. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01068.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botha, A., and M. Herselman. 2016. Rural Teachers as Innovative Co-creators: An Intentional Teacher Professional Development Strategy. 2016 International Conference on Information Resources Management (CONF-IRM), 18–20 May 2016, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Brauner, A., J. Carey, M. Henriksson, M. Sunnerhagen, and E. Ehrenborg. 2007. “Open-ended Assignments and Student Responsibility.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 35 (3): 187–192. doi:10.1002/bmb.49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. 2009. “Self-directed Learning.” In International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, edited by R. Maclean and D. Wilson, 2615–2627. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, S., S. Klein, M. Portsmore, and C. Rogers. 2008. “Advancing Engineering Education in P–12 Classrooms.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 369–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, K., C. Brandt, B. Scott, S. Douglas, M. McGrath, Y. Reimer, and M. Vernon. 2011. “Managing the Complexity of Design Problems Through Studio-Based Learning.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 5 (2), doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1253.
   Google Scholar
• Charosky, G., L. Leveratto, L. Hassi, K. Papageorgiou, J. Ramos-Castro, and R. Bragós. 2018. “Challenge Based Education: An Approach to Innovation Through Multidisciplinary Teams of Students Using Design Thinking.” 2018 XIII technologies applied to electronics teaching conference (TAEE), La Laguna, Spain, 2018, 1–8. doi:10.1109/TAEE.2018.8476051.
   Google Scholar
• Coby, J. 2016. “Open Roads, Open Topics: The Virtues of Open-Ended Final Assignments in Contemporary American Travel Literature Courses.” Teaching American Literature 8 (3): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, S., R. Foley, M. Gorman, J. Denham, and K. Coleman. 2017. “Acquisition of T-Shaped Expertise: An Exploratory Study.” Social Epistemology 31 (2): 165–183. doi:10.1080/02691728.2016.1249435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirkan, H., and J. Spohrer. 2018. “Commentary—Cultivating T-Shaped Professionals in the Era of Digital Transformation.” Service Science 10 (1): 98–109. doi:10.1287/serv.2017.0204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doulougeri, K., A. Van den Beemt, J. Vermunt, M. Bots, and G. Bombaerts. 2022. “Challenge-Based Learning in Engineering Education: Towards Mapping the Landscape and Guiding Educational Practice.” In The Emerald Handbook of Challenge-Based Learning, edited by E. Vilalta-Perdomo, J. Membrillo-Hernández, R. Michel-Villarreal, G. Lakshmi, and M. J. Martínez-Acosta, 35–68. Emerald Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Edson, A. J. 2017. “Learner-controlled Scaffolding Linked to Open-Ended Problems in a Digital Learning Environment.” ZDM Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-017-0873-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, J., D. Herman, and H. Lee. 2015. “Flipped Instruction in English Language Teacher Education: A Design-Based Study in a Complex.” Open-ended Learning Environment. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language 19 (2): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. 2016. “STEM Education K-12: Perspectives on Integration.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (3): 1–8. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraña-Rojas, I., M. López Cabrera, E. Ríos Barrientos, and J. Membrillo-Hernández. 2019. “A Challenge Based Learning Experience in Forensic Medicine.” Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 68: 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, L. D. 2003. Creating Significant Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. E., and T. Savage. 2020. “Challenge-based Learning in Higher Education: An Exploratory Literature Review.” Teaching in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. 2017. “Flourishing in the Face of Constant Disruption: Cultivating the T-Professional or Adaptive Innovator Through WIL.” In Work-Integrated Learning in the 21st Century (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 32), edited by T. Bowan and M. Drysdale, 69–81. Emerald, UK: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K., J. S. Jansujwicz, K. Hutchins, B. Cline, and V. Levesque. 2014. “Socialization to Interdisciplinarity: Faculty and Student Perspectives.” Higher Education 67 (3): 255–271. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9648-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskins, W., J. Johnson, C. Maltbie, and A. Kukreti. 2015. “Changing the Learning Environment in the College of Engineering and Applied Science Using Challenge Based Learning.” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy 5 (1): 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, A. 2014. “Enhancing Systems Thinking Skills of Sophomore Students: An Introductory Project in Electrical Engineering.” International Journal of Engineering Education 30 (3): 738–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez Puente, S. M., M. W. Van Eijck, and W. M. G. Jochems. 2013. “A Sampled Literature Review of Design-Based Learning Approaches: A Search for key Characteristics.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23 (3): 717–732. doi:10.1007/s10798-012-9212-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., A. Vallejo Guevara, J. C. Tudón Martínez, D. Hernández Alcántara, and R. Morales-Menendez. 2019. “Active Learning in Engineering Education. A Review of Fundamentals, Best Practices and Experiences.” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 13: 909–922. doi:10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8.
   Google Scholar
• Högfeldt, A.-K., A. Rosén, C. Mwase, A. Lantz, L. Gumaelius, E. Shayo, S. Lujara, et al. 2019. “Mutual Capacity Building Through North-South Collaboration Using Challenge-Driven Education.” Sustainability 11 (24): 7236. MDPI AG. doi:10.3390/su11247236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijben, J. C. C. M., Van den Beemt, A. Wieczorek, A. J, and M. H. Van Marion. 2021. “Networked Learning to Educate Future Energy Transition Professionals: Results from a Case Study.” European Journal of Engineering Education, doi:10.1080/03043797.2021.1978403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huutoniemi, K., J. T. Klein, H. Bruun, and J. Hukkinen. 2010. “Analyzing Interdisciplinarity: Typology and Indicators.” Research Policy 39: 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifenthaler, D., and D. Gibson. 2019. “Opportunities for Analytics in Challenge-Based Learning.” In Data Analytics Approaches in Educational Games and Gamification Systems, edited by A. Tlili and M. Chang, 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., T. M. Utriainen, and M. Steinert. 2018. “Mapping Remote and Multidisciplinary Learning Barriers: Lessons from Challenge-Based Innovation at CERN.” European Journal of Engineering Education 43 (1): 40–54. doi:10.1080/03043797.2017.1278745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., and S. Adams. 2011. Challenge Based Learning: The Report from the Implementation Project. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. F., R. S. Smith, J. T. Smythe, and R. K. Varon. 2009. Challenge-Based Learning: An Approach for Our Time. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinga, E., and H. Tenhunen. 2018. “Active Learning Through Smart Grid Model Site in Challenge Based Learning Course.” Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics 16 (3): 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Khiat, H. 2017. “Academic Performance and the Practice of Self-Directed Learning: The Adult Student Perspective.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 41 (1): 44–59. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2015.1062849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 2010. “A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, and C. Mitcham, 15–30. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn Rådberg, K., U. Lundqvist, J. Malmqvist, and O. Svensson. 2020. “From CDIO to Challenge-Based Learning Experiences – Expanding Student Learning as Well as Societal Impact?” European Journal of Engineering Education 45 (1): 22–37. doi:10.1080/03043797.2018.1441265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn, W. 2010. “Interdisciplinary Cases and Disciplinary Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, and C. Mitcham, 31–49. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lammi, M., C. Denson, and P. Asunda. 2018. “Search and Review of the Literature on Engineering Design Challenges in Secondary School Settings.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 8 (2): 49–66. doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1172.
   Google Scholar
• Lantada, A. D., A. H. Bayo, and J. D. J. M. Sevillano. 2014. “Promotion of Professional Skills in Engineering Education: Strategies and Challenges.” International Journal of Engineering Education 30 (6): 1525–1538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, J., and J. Holmberg. 2018. “Learning While Creating Value for Sustainability Transitions: The Case of Challenge Lab at Chalmers University of Technology.” Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 4411–4420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijon, M., P. Gudmundsson, P. Staaf, and C. Christersson. 2021. “Challenge Based Learning in Higher Education– A Systematic Literature Review.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International. doi:10.1080/14703297.2021.1892503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönngren, J. 2019. “Wicked Problems in Engineering Education: Preparing Future Engineers to Work for Sustainability.” Environmental Education Research 25 (12): 1808–1809. doi:10.1080/13504622.2019.1639038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnell, M., and A. K. Högfeldt. 2015. Guide to Challenge Driven Education. Stockholm: KTH.
   Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, J., K. Kohn Rådberg, and U. Lundqvist. 2015. “Comparative Analysis of Challenge-Based Learning Experiences.” In Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, edited by CDIO. Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China: Chengdu University of Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S., E. Lopez-Martin, A. Moreno-Pulido, R. Meier, and M. Castro. 2019. “A Comparative Analysis of Worldwide Trends in the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Engineering Education.” IEEE Access 7: 113161–113170. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maya, M., M. Garcia, E. Britton, and A. Acuña. 2017. “Play Lab: Creating Social Value Through Competency and Challenge-Based Learning.” 19th international conference on engineering and product design education, E and PDE 2017, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, L. D., C. Newswander, D. Boden, and M. Borrego. 2011. “Student and Faculty Interdisciplinary Identities in Self-Managed Teams.” Journal of Engineering Education 100 (2): 374–396. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00018.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Membrillo-Hernández, J., and R. García-García. 2020. “Challenge-Based Learning (CBL) in Engineering: Which Evaluation Instruments Are Best Suited to Evaluate CBL Experiences?” 2020 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON), Porto, Portugal, 2020, 885–893. doi:10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125364.
   Google Scholar
• Membrillo-Hernández, J., M. J. Ramírez-Cadena, M. Martínez-Acosta, E. Cruz-Gómez, E. Muñoz-Díaz, and H. Elizalde. 2019. “Challenge Based Learning: The Importance of World-Leading Companies as Training Partners.” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 13 (3): 1103–1113. doi:10.1007/s12008-019-00569-4.
   Google Scholar
• Mielikäinen, M. 2021. “Towards Blended Learning: Stakeholders’ Perspectives on a Project-Based Integrated Curriculum in ICT Engineering Education.” Industry and Higher Education, doi:10.1177/0950422221994471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morosanova, V. 2013. “Self-regulation and Personality.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 86: 452–457. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.596.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, T. H. 2019. “Self-directed Learning: A Fundamental Competence in a Rapidly Changing World.” International Review of Education. Internationale Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft. Revue internationale De Pedagogie 65: 633–653. doi:10.1007/s11159-019-09793-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munda, G. 2000. Conceptualising and Responding to Complexity. Environmental Valuation in Europe, Policy research brief, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge research for the environment.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento, N., A. Santos, A. Sales, and R. Chanin. 2019. “An Investigation of Influencing Factors when Teaching on Active Learning Environments.” Proceedings of the XXXIII Brazilian symposium on software engineering (SBES 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 517–522. doi:10.1145/3350768.3353819.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, M., and K. Cator. 2008. Challenge Based Learning: Take Action and Make a Difference, Challenge Based Learning White Paper. Cupertino, CA: Apple.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, M., K. Cator, and M. Torres. 2016. Challenge Based Learner User Guide. Redwood City, CA: Digital Promise.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. 2002. “Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners.” Science Education 86: 548–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepin, B., and Z. J. Kock. 2019. “Towards a Better Understanding of Engineering Students’ use and Orchestration of Resources: Actual Student Study Paths.” In Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, edited by U. T. Jankvist, M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, and M. Veldhuis. Utrecht: Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
   Google Scholar
• Pepin, B., and Z. J. Kock. 2021. “Students’ Use of Resources in a Challenge-Based Learning Context Involving Mathematics.” International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education 7: 306–327. doi:10.1007/s40753-021-00136-x.
   Google Scholar
• Piironen, A., A. Ikonen, K. Sauren, and, P. Lankinen. 2009. “Challenge Based Learning in Engineering Education.” Paper presented at the 5th international CDIO conference, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, G., and H. Gijlers. 2021. “A Pilot Study to Inform the Design of a Supportive Environment for Challenge-Based Collaboration.” In Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 10th International conference. Workshops. MIS4TEL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1236, edited byZ. Kubincová, L. Lancia, E. Popescu, M. Nakayama, V. Scarano, and A. Gil. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52287-2_22.
   Google Scholar
• Quweider, M., and F. Khan. 2016. “Implementing a Challenge-Based Approach to Teaching Selected Courses in CS and Computational Sciences.” ASEE's 123rd annual conference & exposition, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, M. 2015. “System Level Approach for Computer Engineering Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education 31 (1): 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redshaw, C., and I. Frampton. 2014. “Optimising Interdisciplinary Problem-Based Learning in Postgraduate Environmental and Science Education: Recommendations from a Case Study.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 9 (1): 97–110. doi:10.12973/ijese.2014.205a.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, D., and M. Paretti. 2009. “Identifying Barriers to and Outcomes of Interdisciplinarity in the Engineering Classroom.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1080/03043790802710185.
   Google Scholar
• Rieckmann, M. 2012. “Future-oriented Higher Education: Which key Competencies Should be Fostered Through University Teaching and Learning?” Futures 44 (2): 127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roselli, R. J., and S. P. Brophy. 2006. “Effectiveness of Challenge-Based Instruction in Biomechanics.” Journal of Engineering Education 95: 311–324. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00906.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawatsky, A. P., J. T. Ratelle, S. L. Bonnes, J. S. Egginton, and T. J. Beckman. 2017. “A Model of Self-Directed Learning in Internal Medicine Residency: A Qualitative Study Using Grounded Theory.” BMC Medical Education 17: Art. 227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schugurensky, D. 2000. “The Forms of Informal Learning: Towards a Conceptualization of the Field.” WALL Working Paper No.19. University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Sinek, S. 2009. Start with why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action. New York: Portfolio.
   Google Scholar
• Soares, F. O., M. J. Sepulveda, S. Monteiro, R. M. Lima, and J. Dinis-Carvalho. 2013. “An Integrated Project of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Engineering Education.” Mechatronics 23 (8): 987–996. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternad, D. 2015. “A Challenge-Feedback Learning Approach to Teaching International Business.” Journal of Teaching in International Business 26 (4): 241–257. doi:10.1080/08975930.2015.1124355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. 2003. “Creative Thinking in the Classroom.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 47 (3): 325–338. doi:10.1080/00313830308595.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. M. 2001. “Education: Cultural and Religious Concepts.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes, 4197–4200. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, A., M. Bruns, I. Reymen, and B. Pepin. 2020. “Issues Influencing Assessment Practices of Inter-Program Challenge-Based Learning (CBL): The Case of ISBEP at TU/e innovation Space.” Proceedings of the SEFI 48th annual conference: engaging engineering education, Enschede, 511–521.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J. 2003. “Curriculum Perspectives: An Introduction.” In Curriculum Landscapes and Trends, edited by J. Van den Akker, W. Kuiper, and U. Hameyer, 1–10. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Beemt, A., and M. MacLeod. 2021. “Tomorrow’s Challenges for Today’s Students: Challenge-Based Learning and Interdisciplinarity.” In Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening – and Lasting? Proceedings of the SEFI 49th Annual Conference, edited by H. U. Heiß, H. M. Järvinen, A. Mayer and A. Schulz, 588–597.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Beemt, A., G. Van de Watering, and M. Bots. 2021. “Variety in Challenge-Based Learning in Higher Education.” In Blended Learning in Engineering Education: Challenging, Enlightening – and Lasting? Proceedings of the SEFI 49th Annual Conference, edited by H. U. Heiß, H. M. Järvinen, A. Mayer, and A. Schulz, 598–609. Berlin: Technical University Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Beemt, A., M. Macleod, J. Van der Veen, A. Van de Ven, S. Van Baelen, R. Klaassen, and M. Boon. 2020. “Interdisciplinary Engineering Education: A Review of Vision, Teaching, and Support.” Journal of Engineering Education 109 (3): 508–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., S. Heeneman, and L. W. T. Schuwirth. 2017. “Programmatic Assessment.” In A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers, edited by J. Dent, R. Harden, and D. Hunt, 295–303. Edinburgh: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten, C., D. Sluijsmans, and D. Joosten-ten Brinke. 2017. “Competence Assessment as Learner Support in Education.” In Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education, edited by M. Mulder, 607–630. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J., and V. Donche. 2017. “A Learning Patterns Perspective on Student Learning in Higher Education: State of the Art and Moving Forward.” Educational Psychology Review 29: 269–299. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojak, B., R. Price, and A. Griffin. 2010. “Corporate Innovation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, and C. Mitcham, 546–560. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vrieling, E., Van den Beemt, A. &, and M. De Laat. 2016. “What’s in a Name: Dimensions of Social Learning in Teacher Groups.” Teachers & Teaching: Theory in Practice 22 (3): 273–292. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1058588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William, D. 2011. “What is Assessment for Learning?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001.
   Google Scholar