Chinese school teachers’ conceptions of high-stakes and low-stakes assessments: an invariance analysis

References

• Allen, A. 2012. “Cultivating the Myopic Learner: The Shared Project of High-Stakes and Low-Stakes Assessment.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 33 (5): 641–659. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.668832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. 2007. “High Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.” Educational Researcher 36 (5): 258–267. doi:10.3102/0013189X07306523.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, D. A. 2015, April. “Professional Identity and High-stakes Test: What they Tell us about Schools Teachers and Students. Paper Presented at The Biennial Conference of The University of The West Indies Schools of Education. Trinidad and Tobag. India: St. Augustine.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C., and S. Finney. 2016. “Modelling Change in Effort across A Low-Stakes Testing Session: A Latent Growth Curve Modelling Approach.” Applied Measurement in Education 29 (1): 46–64. doi:10.1080/08957347.2015.1102914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, R. 2011. “Assessment Reforms around the World.” In Assessment Reform in Education: Policy and Practice, edited by R. Berry and B. Adamson, 89–102. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Booher‐Jennings, J. 2008. “Learning to Label: Socialisation.” Gender, and the Hidden Curriculum of High-stakes Testing. British Journal of Sociology of Education 29 (2): 149-160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L. 2011. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: Comparing Primary and Secondary Teachers in New Zealand.” Assessment Matters 3: 45-70.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., and A. Remesal. 2012. “Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.” The Spanish Journal of Psychology 15 (1): 75–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., H. Chaudhry, and R. Dhamija. 2015. “The Impact of an Assessment Policy upon Teachers’ Self-Reported Assessment Beliefs and Practices: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Indian Teachers in Private Schools.” International Journal of Educational Research 71: 50–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., and L. Gao. 2015. “Chinese Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment for and of Learning: Six Competing and Complementary Purposes.” Cogent Education 2 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2014.993836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., S. K. F. Hui, F. W. M. Yu, and K. J Kennedy. 2011. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment in Chinese Contexts: A Tripartite Model of Accountability, Improvement, and Irrelevance.” International Journal of Educational Research 50 (5–6): 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, C. L., S. Maarouf, J. Burcham, and D. Greer. 2016. “The Examination of a Teacher Candidate Assessment Rubric: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Teaching and Teacher Education 57: 79-96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M., R. J. Shavelson, and B. Muthén. 1989. “Testing for The Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Structures: The Issue of Partial Measurement Invariance.” Psychological Bulletin 105 (3): 456-466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cankoy, O., and M. A. Tut. 2005. “High-Stakes Testing and Mathematics Performance of Fourth Graders in North Cyprus.” The Journal of Educational Research 98 (4): 234–243. doi:10.3200/JOER.98.4.234-244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and R. Lam. 2014. Developing Assessment for Productive Learning in Confucian-Influenced Settings: Potentials and Challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J, and B. Cowie. 2016. “Chinese Preservice Teachers’ Beliefs about Assessment.” Educational Practice and Theory 38 (2): 77-93.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and G. T. L. Brown. 2013. “High-stakes Examination Preparation That Controls Teaching: Chinese Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Excellent Teaching and Assessment.” Journal of Education for Teaching 39 (5): 541-556. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2013.836338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., and R. B. Rensvold. 2002. “Evaluating Goodness-Of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modelling 9 (2): 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, D. T. 2016. “Teaching to the Test: A Mixed Methods Study of Instructional Change from Large-Scale Testing in Canadian Schools.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (5): 468–487. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2016.1244042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, S. P., J. L. Jennings, and A. A. Beveridge. 2012. “Teacher Effectiveness on High- and Low-Stakes Tests.” Society Research on Educational Effectiveness 3 (11): 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., and J. W. Osborne. 2005. “Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis.” Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation 10: 18-37.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, L. 2004. Teaching for the Test: How and Why Test Preparation is Appropriate. In Defending Standardized Testing, edited by R. P. Phelps, 159-174. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. New York: Teachers’ College Record.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., C. E. Mathers, and A. J. Myers. 2016. “Investigating the Dimensionality of Examinee Motivation across Instruction Conditions in Low-Stakes Testing Contexts.” Research and Practice in Assessment 11: 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, H., and M. M Buehl. 2012. Spring Cleaning for the “Messy” Construct of Teachers' Beliefs: What are they? Which have been Examined? What can they Tell us? In APA Educational Psychology Handbook: Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors, edited by K. R. Harris, S. Graham and T. Urdan, pp. 471–499. Washington, DC: APA
   Google Scholar
• Fulmer, G. W., K. H. K. Tan, and I. C. H. Lee. 2017. “Relationships among Singaporean Secondary Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment and School and Policy Contextual Factors.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 1–18. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1336427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L., P. Wang, Y. Han, and Z. Cai. 2010, July. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: Developing Models for Teachers in China.” Paper presented at the biannual conference of the International Test Commission, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Gebril, A., and G. T. L. Brown. 2014. “The Effect of High-Stakes Examination Systems on Teacher Beliefs: Egyptian Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 21 (1): 16–33. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.831030.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., and J. G. Hamilton. 1996. “Viability of Exploratory Factor Analysis as a Precursor to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Structural Equation Modelling 3: 62-72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, K., and M. Clarke. 2003. “High-stakes Assessment in England and Singapore.” Theory into Practice 42 (1): 66-74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S. B., Y. Guo, G. Beckett, Q. Li, and L.Y. Guo. 2012. Teaching under China’s Market Economy: Five Case Studies. Research Report. http://download.ei-ie.org/Docs/WebDepot/Study%20on%20China.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heubert, J. P., and R. M. Hauser. 1999. High Stakes: Testing for Tracking, Promotion, and Graduation. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6336/high-stakes-testing-for-tracking-promotion-and-graduation
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1-55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger, D. J., K. Maag Merki, M. Holmeier, and B. Oerke. 2012. “State-wide, Low-stakes Tests and a Teaching-to-the-test Effect? an Analysis of Data from Two German Bundesländern.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 19 (4): 451–467.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y. K. 2015. “Vigour from Various Assessment (Huoli Laiziyu Duoyuan Pingjia).” China Education Daily, 25, June.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K. J. 2016. “Exploring the Influence of Culture on Assessment: The Case of Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment in Confucian Heritage Cultures.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by G. T. L. Brown and L. R. Harris, 404–419. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kleij, F. M. V., J. J. Cunning, and A. Looney. 2017. “Policy Expectations and Support for Teacher Formative Assessment in Australian Education Reform.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (6): 620–637. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1374924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V., and C. Wyatt-Smith. 2012. “The Impact of High Stakes Testing: The Australian Story.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 19 (1): 65–79. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.592972.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J. 2009. “Learning to Self-Perfect: Chinese Beliefs about Learning.” In Revisiting the Chinese Learner: Changing Contexts, Changing Education, edited by C. K. Chan and N. Rao, 35–69. Hong Kong: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, X. Y., H. Kidwai, and M. X. Zhang. 2016. How Shanghai Does It: Insights and Lessons from the Highest-Ranking Education System in the World. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lobascher, S. 2011. “What are the Potential Impacts of High-Stakes Testing on Literacy Education in Australia?” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 34 (2): 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., K. Hau, and Z. Wen. 2004. “In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-testing Approaches to Setting Cut Off Values for Fit Indices and Dangers in Over Generalizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings.” Structural Equation Modelling 11 (3): 320–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (MOE). 2010. National Outline for Mid and Long-Term Education Reform and Development 2010–2020. Beijing, PRC: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. 2007. “Clarifying the Purposes of Educational Assessment.” Assessment in Education 14 (2): 149–170. doi:10.1080/09695940701478321.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., and L. R. Harris. 2016. Accountability assessment’s Effects on Teachers and Schools. In Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment, edited by G. Brown, and L. R. Harris, 40-56. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Paris, FR: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Penk, C., and D. Richter. 2016. “Change in Test-Taking Motivation and Its Relationship to Test Performance in Low-Stakes Assessments.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 29: 55–79. doi:10.1007/s11092-016-9248-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, R. P. 2006. “Characteristics of an Effective Student Testing System.” Educational Horizons 85 (1): 19-29.
   Google Scholar
• Polesel, J., S. Rice, and N. Dulfer. 2014. “The Impact of High-stakes Testing on Curriculum and Pedagogy: A Teacher Perspective from Australia.” Journal of Education Policy 29 (5): 640-657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, L. 2007. “Is Testing an Efficient Agent for Pedagogical Change? Examining The Intended Wash Back of The Writing Task in a High-stakes English Test in China. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 14 (1): 51-74.
   Google Scholar
• Remesal, A., and G. T. L. Brown. 2015. “Conceptions of Assessment When the Teaching Context and Learner Population Matter: Compulsory School versus Non-Compulsory Adult Education Contexts.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 30 (3): 331–347. doi:10.1007/s10212-014-0236-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sessoms, J., and S. Finney. 2015. “Measuring and Modeling Change in Examinee Effort on Low-Stakes Tests across Testing Occasions.” International Journal of Testing 15 (4): 356–388. doi:10.1080/15305058.2015.1034866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. 2005. “Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding.” Educational Leadership 63 (3): 66–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, F., F. Hill, B. Cowie, and A. Gilmore. 2014. Preparing Teachers to use the Enabling Power of Assessment. In Designing assessment for quality learning, C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski and P. Colbert, 303-324. Collingwood, Vic, Australia: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F., G. Corkery, J. Buckley, and A. Calvert. 2012. “Changes in Secondary School Preservice Teachers’ Concerns about Teaching in New Zealand.” Journal of Teacher Education 64: 60-74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spann, P. 2015. The Negative Effects of High-stakes Testing. Retrieved from LUC Edu Web Site: http://www.luc.edu/media/lucedu/law/centers/childlaw/childed/pdfs/2015studentpapers/Spann.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. M. 2005. High Stakes Testing: Coping with Collateral Damage. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G. 1992. Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, edited by D. A. Grouws, 127-146. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• van de Grift, W., and M. van der Wal. 2011, January. “Measuring the Development of Professional Competence among Teachers.” Paper presented at ICSEI Conference, Limassol, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, A. D., Z. Li, and B. D. Zumbo. 2007. “Decoding The Meaning Of Factorial Invariance and Updating The Practice Of Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis: a Demonstration with Timss Data. Practical Assessment.” Research & Evaluation 12 (3): 1-26.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., and H. Torrance. 2009. “The Development and Consequences of National Curriculum Assessment for Primary Education in England.” Educational Research 51 (2): 213–228. doi:10.1080/00131880902891479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., and G. T. L. Brown. 2016. “Teacher Assessment Literacy in Practice: A Reconceptualization.” Teaching and Teacher Education 58: 149–162. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., and E. C. K. Cheng. 2015. “Primary Teachers’ Attitudes, Intentions and Practices regarding Formative Assessment.” Teaching and Teacher Education 45: 128–136. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, A., and M. Johnston. 2017. “The Impact of School-Based Assessment for Qualifications on Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (6): 638–654. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1295020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar