Synergy effects in learning? The influence of mathematics as a second subject on teacher students’ physics content knowledge

References

• Abell, S. K. 2007. “Research on Science Teacher Knowledge.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell, and N. G. Lederman, 1105–49. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W. 1981. “Instruction and Time-on-Task: A Review.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 13: 289–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., M. H. Thames, and G. Phelps. 2008. “Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes it Special?” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5): 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., M. Kunter, W. Blum, M. Brunner, T. Voss, A. Jordan, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, M. Neubrand, and Y.-M. Tsai. 2010. “Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress.” American Educational Research Journal 47 (1): 133–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaujean, A. 2014. Latent Variable Modeling Using R. A Step-by-Step Guide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, A., P. Friedrichsen, and J. Loughran. 2015. Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, 28–42. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, B., G. Kaiser, B. Schwarz, R. Lehmann, S. Seeber, C. Müller, and A. Felbrich. 2008. “Entwicklung des fachbezogenen Wissens in der Lehrerausbildung.” In Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer. Wissen, Überzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -refendare; erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung, edited by S. Blömeke, G. Kaiser, and R. Lehmann, 135–70. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Brückner, Sebastian, Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Stefan Küchemann, Pascal Klein, and Jochen Kuhn. 2020. “Changes in Students’ Understanding of and Visual Attention on Digitally Represented Graphs Across Two Domains in Higher Education: A Postreplication Study.” Frontiers in Psychology 11: 2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, A., A. Lindmeier, and A. Heinze. 2018. “What Kind of Content Knowledge do Secondary Mathematics Teachers Need? A Conceptualization Taking Into Account Academic and School Mathematics.” Journal für Mathematikdidaktik 39 (2): 319–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-018-0127-2.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. 2015. “A Model of Teacher Professional Knowledge and Skill Including PCK: Results of the Thinking from the PCK Summit.” In Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, edited by A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, and J. Loughran, 28–42. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., A. Schoenfeld, and C. Lee. 2005. “Teaching Subject Matter.” In Preparing Teachers for a Changing World. What Teachers Should Learn and be Able to do, edited by L. Darling-Hammond, and J. Bransford, 301–31. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, A., A. Dreher, A. Lindmeier, and C. Niemand. 2016. “Akademisches versus schulbezogenes Fachwissen – ein differenzierteres Modell des fachspezifischen Professionswissens von angehenden Mathematiklehrkräften der Sekundarstufe.” [Academic vs school-related content knowledge: A differentiated model of discpline-specific teacher knowledge of pre-service secondary Mathematics teachers]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 19 (2): 329–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyles, C., K. Newman, and R. Noss. 2001. “Changing Patterns of Transition from School to University Mathematics.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 32 (6): 829–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus new Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1): 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeschke, C., C. Kuhn, A. Lindmeier, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, H. Saas, and A. Heinze. 2019. “What is the Relationship Between Knowledge in Mathematics and Knowledge in Economics? Investigating the Professional Knowledge of (pre-Service) Teachers Trained in two Subjects.” Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 65 (4): 511–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, M. M., K. Neumann, and H. E. Fischer. 2017. “The Impact of Physics Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Motivation on Students’ Achievement and Interest.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54 (5): 586–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, V. 2014. “Science Teachers’ Content Knowledge.” In Exploring Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Knowledge: Windows Into Teacher Thinking, edited by H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, M. Askew, and J. Loughran, 15–28. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kleickmann, T., J. Großschedl, U. Harms, A. Heinze, S. Herzog, F. Hohenstein, O. Köller, et al. 2014. “Professionswissen von Lehramtsstudierenden der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fächer – Testentwicklung im Rahmen des Projekts KiL. [Professional Knowledge of Teacher Students in Mathematics and the Science Subjects – Test Development in Scope of the Project KiL].” Unterrichtswissenschaft 42 (3): 280–88. doi:https://doi.org/1403280.
   Google Scholar
• Kleickmann, T., D. Richter, M. Kunter, J. Elsner, M. Besser, S. Krauss, and J. Baumert. 2013. “Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Role of Structural Differences in Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 64 (1): 90–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P., S. Küchemann, S. Brückner, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, and J. Kuhn. 2019. “Student Understanding of Graph Slope and Area Under a Curve: A Replication Study Comparing First-Year Physics and Economics Students.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 15 (2): 020116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, S., J. Baumert, and W. Blum. 2008. “Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Content Knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV Constructs.” ZDM Mathematics Education 40: 873–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kulgemeyer, C., and J. Riese. 2018. “From Professional Knowledge to Professional Performance: The Impact of CK and PCK on Teaching Quality in Explaining Situations.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (10): 1393–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). 2008. Ländergemeinsame inhaltliche Anforderungen für die Fachwissenschaften und Fachdidaktiken in der Lehrerbildung [Common Substantial Requirements for Content and Pedagogical Content in Teacher Training]. Berlin: Sekretariat der Kultusministerkonferenz.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., U. Klusmann, J. Baumert, D. Richter, T. Voss, and A. Hachfeld. 2013. “Professional Competence of Teachers: Effects on Instructional Quality and Student Development.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (3): 805–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachner, A., and M. Nückles. 2016. “Tell me why! Content Knowledge Predicts Process-Orientation of Math Researchers’ and Math Teachers’ Explanations.” Instructional Science 44 (3): 221–42. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11251-015-9365-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, K., H. Härtig, U. Harms, and I. Parchmann. 2017. “Science Teacher Preparation in Germany.” In Model Science Teacher Preparation Programs: An International Comparison of What Works Best, edited by J. Pedersen, T. Isozaki, and T. Hirano, 29–52. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I., C. Jeschke, and A. Heinze. 2020. “First Year Students’ Resilience to Cope with Mathematics Exercises in the University Mathematics Studies.” Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-020-00177-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, R., R. Toerien, and J. Luft. 2019. “Knowing More Than Their Students: Characterizing Secondary Science Teachers’ Subject Matter Knowledge.” School Science and Mathematics 119: 150–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rach, S., and A. Heinze. 2017. “The Transition from School to University in Mathematics: Which Influence do School-Related Variables Have?” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (7): 1343–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9744-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redish, E. F., and E. Kuo. 2015. “Language of Physics, Language of Math: Disciplinary Culture and Dynamic Epistemology.” Science & Education 24: 561–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9749-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollnick, M. 2017. “Learning About Semi Conductors for Teaching—the Role Played by Content Knowledge in Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Development.” Research in Science Education 47: 833–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9530-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., N. R. Kuncel, J. J. Arneson, S. R. Cooper, and S. D. Waters. 2009. “Does Socioeconomic Status Explain the Relationship Between Admissions Tests and Post-Secondary Academic Performance?” Psychological Bulletin 135 (1): 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., G. Sonnert, H. P. Coyle, N. Cook-Smith, and J. L. Miller. 2013. “The Influence of Teachers’ Knowledge on Student Learning in Middle School Physical Science Classrooms.” American Educational Research Journal 50 (5): 1020–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213477680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., L. Cogan, and R. Houang. 2011. “The Role of Opportunity to Learn in Teacher Preparation: An International Context.” Journal of Teacher Education 62 (2): 138–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., J. Keeney, F. L. Oswald, T. J. Pleskac, A. Q. Billington, R. Sinha, and M. Zorzie. 2009. “Prediction of 4-Year College Student Performance Using Cognitive and Noncognitive Predictors and the Impact on Demographic Status of Admitted Students.” Journal of Applied Psychology 94: 1479–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. 1978. Science, Curriculum and Liberal Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those who Understands: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sorge, S., J. Kröger, S. Petersen, and K. Neumann. 2019. “Structure and Development of pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Professional Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (7): 862–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1346326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatto, M. T., J. Schwille, S. L. Senk, L. Ingvarson, G. Rowley, R. Peck, K. Bankov, M. Rodriguez, and M. Reckase. 2012. Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries: Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam, Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Tatto, M. T., and S. Senk. 2011. “The Mathematics Education of Future Primary and Secondary Teachers: Methods and Findings from the Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics.” Journal of Teacher Education 62: 115–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110386798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchoshanov, M., M. D. Cruz, K. Huereca, K. Shakirova, L. Shakirova, and E. N. Ibragimova. 2017. “Examination of Lower Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Its Connection to Students’ Performance.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15: 683–702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9703-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhden, O., R. Karam, M. Pietrocolo, and G. Pospiech. 2012. “Modelling Mathematical Reasoning in Physics Education.” Science & Education 21: 485–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, K. C., and J. R. Okey. 1983. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Various Science Teaching Strategies on Achievement.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20 (5): 419–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H.-H. 2018. “The Content Knowledge Mathematics Teachers Need.” In Mathematics Matters in Education, edited by Y. Li, W J Lewis, and J. Madden, 43–91. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar