What, why and how – the policy, purpose and practice of grammatical terminology

References

• Andrews, R., C. Torgerson, S. Beverton, A. Freeman, T. Locke, G. Low, A. Robinson, and D. Zhu. 2006. “The Effect of Grammar Teaching on Writing Development.” British Educational Research Journal 32 (1): 39–55. doi:10.1080/01411920500401997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, R. 2000. Developing Writing 3–13. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, H. 2016. “Teacher Knowledge and Beliefs about Grammar: A Case Study of an English Primary School.” English in Education 50 (2): 148–163. English. doi:10.1111/eie.12100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, R. 2008. “EFL Major’s Knowledge of Metalinguistic Knowledge: A Comparative Study.” Language Awareness 18 (2): 113–128. doi:10.1080/09658410802513751.
   Google Scholar
• Bew Report. 2011. “Key Stage 2 Testing, Assessment and Accountability Review: Final Report.”
   Google Scholar
• Bialystock, E. 1994. “Analysis and Control in the Development of Second Language Proficiency.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16 (2): 157–168. doi:10.1017/S0272263100012857.
   Google Scholar
• Bold, C. 2012. Using Narrative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S., and A. Burns. 2008. “Integrating Grammar in Adult TESOL Classrooms.” Applied Linguistics 29 (3): 456–482. doi:10.1093/applin/amn020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cajkler, W. 2004. “How a Dead Butler Was Killed: The Way English National Strategies Main Grammatical Parts.” Language and Education 18 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/09500780408666864.
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J. 1987. “Developing a Framework for the Elicitation and Analysis of Teachers’ Verbal Reports.” Oxford Review of Education 13 (2): 183–189. doi:10.1080/0305498870130206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, R. 1990. “The New Grammar Teaching.” In Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum, edited by R. Carter. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. 1996. “`Politics and Knowledge about Language: The LINC Project’.” In Literacy and Society,edited by R. Hasan and G. Williams. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. 2000. Philosophy for Linguistics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. 2006. How Language Works. London: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, I. 2018. “‘Suddenly, I Am Part of the Poem’: Texts as Worlds, Reader-Response and Grammar in Teaching Poetry.” English in Education 52 (1): 7–19. doi:10.1080/04250494.2018.1414398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, G. 2003. Grammar for Improving Writing and Reading in Secondary School. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2013a. “National Curriculum.” https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/425601/PRIMARY_national_curriculum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2013b. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2016-key-stage-2-english-grammar-punctuation-and-spelling-sample-test-materials-mark-scheme-and-test-administration-instructions
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2014. “National Curriculum in England: English Programmes of Study.” www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-inengland-english
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2016. “Key Stage 1 English Grammar, Punctuations and Spelling Test Framework.” https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/510943/2016_KS1_EnglishGPS_framework_PDFA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). 1998. The National Literacy Strategy Framework for Teaching. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). 2000. The National Literacy Strategy: Grammar for Writing. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Employment (DFEE) 1999. The National Curriculum, Handbook for Primary Teachers in England. London: DFEE
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Science (DES). 1988. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of English Language (Kingman Report). London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Science (DES). 1989. English for Ages 5–16 (Cox Report). London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Science (DES). 1990. Language in the National Curriculum’ (LINC). London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B., and P. Jones. 2010. “From Traditional to Grammar to Functional Grammar: Bridging the Divide.” NALDIC Quarterly 8 (1): 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Eaglestone, R. 2017. Doing English: A Guide for Literature Students. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., and N. Mercer. 1987. Common Knowledge - Development of Understanding in the Classroom. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, K. 2010. “The Professional Identity of English Teachers in the Secondary School.” Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September, University of Warwick, England.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., M. Lewis, and B. Davis. 1999. “The Implementation of a Literacy Hour in Small Rural Schools.” British Educational Research Association conference, University of Sussex, September 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Frater, G. 2004. “Improving Dean’s Writing: Or, What Shall We Tell the Children.” Literacy 38 (2): 78–82. doi:10.1111/j.0034-0472.2004.03802003.x.
   Google Scholar
• Giovanelli, M. 2015. “Becoming an English Language Teacher: Linguistic Knowledge, Anxieties and the Shifting Sense of Identity.” Language and Education 29 (5): 416–429. doi:10.1080/09500782.2015.1031677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovanelli, M. 2016. “Developing Beginning Teachers’ Linguistic Awareness: Issues and Practice in ITE.” In Knowing about Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom, edited by M. Giovanelli and D. Clayton, 186–197. Abingdon (UK): National Association for the Teaching of English (NATE), Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Golombek, P. R., and K. E. Johnson. 2004. “Narrative Inquiry as a Mediational Space: Examining Emotional and Cognitive Dissonance in Second‐Language Teachers’ Development.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 10 (3): 307–327. doi:10.1080/1354060042000204388. June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and D. Perin. 2007. “A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (3): 445–476. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hansard. 1991. “Hansard Volume: House of Commons Debates.” https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmse9192.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hartwell, P. 1985. “Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar.” College English 47 (2): 105–127. National Council of Teachers of English. http://www.jstor.org/stable/376562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Inspector of Schools. 1984. ‘English 5–16ʹ Curriculum Matters 1. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Holt Reynolds, D. 1992. “Personal History-Based Beliefs as Relevant Prior Knowledge in Course Work.” American Educational Research Journal 29 (2): 325–349. doi:10.3102/00028312029002325.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 2001. “Grammar Teaching and Writing Skills: The Research Evidence.” Syntax in the Schools 17: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 2010. An Introduction to Word Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 2013. “How Linguistics Has Influenced School Teaching in England.” Accessed July 23 2018. dickhudson.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/influence.doc
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 2016. “Language Policy in Schools.” In Knowing about Language, edited by M. Giovanelli and D. Clayton. London: NATE/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R., and J. Walmsley. 2005. “The English Patient: English Grammar and Teaching in the 20th Century.” Journal of Linguistics 41 (3): 593–622. doi:10.1017/50022226705003464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. E. 1994. “The Emerging Beliefs and Instructional Practices of Preservice ESL Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 10 (4): 439–452. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)90024-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., D. Myhill, and T. Bailey. 2013. “Grammar for Writing? an Investigation of Contextualised Grammar Teaching on Students’ Writing.” Reading and Writing 26 (8): 1241–1263. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9416-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. 1992. “Implications of Research on Teacher Beliefs.” Educational Psychologist 27: 65–90. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, J. 1997. “Grammar, Metalanguage and Writing Development.” Teacher Development 1 (3): 432–445. doi:10.1080/13664539700200029.
   Google Scholar
• Kolln, M. 1996. Rhetorical Grammar: Grammatical Choices, Rhetorical Effects. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A. 2009. “Rhetorical Grammar and the Grammar of Schooling: Teaching ‘Powerful Verbs’ in the English National Literacy Strategy.” Linguistics and Education 20: 378–400. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2009.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T. 2009. “Grammar and Writing – The International Debate.” In The Sage Handbook of Writing Development, edited by R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, and M. Nystrand. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T. 2010. “Introduction: “Grammar Wars” and Beyond.” In Beyond the Grammar Wars, edited by T. Locke. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. 1975. Schoolteacher a Sociological Study Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Micciche, L. 2004. “Making a Case for Rhetorical Grammar.” College Composition and Communication 55 (4): 716–737. NCTE is based in Urbana USA.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, H. J. 1967. The Uses of English: Guidelines for the Teaching of English from the Anglo-American Conference at Dartmouth College. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2005. “Ways of Knowing: Writing with Grammar in Mind.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 4 (3): 77–96. from Helen Lines paper.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., and A. Watson. 2014. “The Role of Grammar in the Writing Curriculum: A Review of the Literature.” Child Language Teaching and Therapy 30 (1): 41–62 & 41–62. doi:10.1177/0265659013514070.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., S. M. Jones, H. Lines, and A. Watson. 2012. “Re-Thinking Grammar: The Impact of Embedded Grammar Teaching on Students’ Writing and Students’ Metalinguistic Understanding.” Research Papers in Education 27 (2): 139–166. doi:10.1080/02671522.2011.637640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. 1987. “The Role of Beliefs in the Practice of Teaching.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 19 (4): 317–328. doi:10.1080/0022027870190403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbolt, H. 1921. “The Newbolt Report: The Teaching of English in England.” www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/Newbolt
   Google Scholar
• Norman, K., ed. 1992. Thinking Voices: The Work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, P. 2010. “Fitness or Formality, Fruitcake or Fudge? A Retrospective on Grammar in the English Curriculum.” English, Drama, Media 17: 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62 (3): 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petruzella, B. A. 1996. “Grammar Instruction: What Teachers Say.” English Journal 85 (7): 68–72. doi:10.2307/820510.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, S., and S. Borg. 2009. “Exploring Tensions between Teachers’ Grammar Teaching Beliefs and Practices.” System 37 (3): 380–390. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PISA. 2006. ‘Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World: Volumes 1 & 2ʹ. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Pomphrey, C., and R. Moger. 1999. “Cross-Subject Dialogue about Language: Attitudes and Perceptions of PGCE Students of English and Modern Languages.” Language Awareness 8: 3&4. doi:10.1080/09658419908667131.
   Google Scholar
• Poulson, L., E. Avramidis, R. Fox, J. Medwell, and D. Wray. 2001. “The Theoretical Beliefs of Effective Teachers of Literacy in Primary Schools: An Exploratory Study of Orientations to Reading and Writing.” Research Papers in Education 16 (3): 271–292. doi:10.1080/02671520126827.
   Google Scholar
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 1998. ‘The Grammar Papers: Perspectives on the Teaching of Grammar in the National Curriculum. London: QCA.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, C. 2011. “Watching White Paint Dry – First Reactions on Reading the Executive Summary of the Bew Report.” http://www.primaryreview.org.uk/downloads_/news/2011/06/FirstReactions_to_BewReportSummarJune2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. 1996. “The Role of Attitudes and Beliefs in Learning to Teach.” In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, edited by J. Sikula, 102–119. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, J. 1990. “What Do We Mean by Knowledge about Language?” In Knowledge about Language and the Curriculum, edited by R. Carter. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, J. 2015. Curriculum and Assessment in English 3 to 1`9: A Better Plan: The National Curriculum for English from 2015. Leicester: UKLA and Owen Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. 1968. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rudduck, J. 1999. “‘Education for All’, ‘Achievement for All’ and Pupils Who are ‘Too Good to Drift’ (The Second Harold Dent Memorial Lecture).” Education Today 49 (2): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., ed. 1969. Directions in the Teaching of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Literacy Association (UKLA). 2013. “Statement on Teaching Grammar.” http://www.ukla.org/news/story/ukla_publishes_its_statement_on_teaching_grammar/
   Google Scholar
• Vavra, E. 1996. “On Not Teaching Grammar.” The English Journal 85 (7): 32–37. doi:10.2307/820504.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A. 2015. “Conceptualisations of ‘Grammar Teaching’: L1 English Teachers’ Beliefs about Teaching Grammar for Writing.” Language Awareness 24 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/09658416.2013.828736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. 2016. Language Policy and Language Planning: From Nationalism to Globalisation. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar