34,180
Views
756
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research

&

References

  • ACER. (2010). Getting first-year students engaged. Research Briefing: Australasian Survey of Student Engagement, 6. Retrieved March 24, 2012, from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=ausse
  • Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. New York: Westview Press.
  • Andrews, T., Leonard, M., Colgrove, C., & Kalinowski, S. (2011). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 394–405. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061
  • Baker, J. (2000). The ‘classroom flip’: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL.
  • Baron, P., & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759–772. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.655711
  • Beachboard, M., Beachboard, J., Li, W., & Adkison, S. (2011). Cohorts and relatedness: Self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 853–874. doi: 10.1007/s11162-011-9221-8
  • Berrett, D. (2012, February 19). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved July 10, 2013, from http://chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the-Classroom/130857/
  • Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1989). Towards a model of school-based curriculum development and assessment using the SOLO taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33(2), 151–163.
  • Bligh, D. (2000). What's the use of lectures? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Clark, R.C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2005). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  • Cole, M., Feild, H., & Harris, S. (2004). Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students’ reactions to a management class. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(1), 64–85. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2004.12436819
  • Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525–545. doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2
  • Deci, E., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B., & Leone, D. (1994). Facilitating internalisation: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. doi: 10.1037/a0012801
  • ERIC. (2013). ERIC search: ‘Flipped classroom’. Retrieved June 20, 2013, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/simpleSearch.jsp;jsessionid=ZPDsAWY4X8BNNKujkOnExw__.ericsrv004?newSearch=true&eric_sortField=&searchtype=keyword&pageSize=10&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=%22flipped+classroom%22&eric_displayStartCount=1&_pageLabel=ERICSearchResult&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=kw
  • Flink, C., Boggiano, A., & Barrett, M. (1990). Controlling teaching strategies: Undermining children's self-determination and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 916–924. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.916
  • Gauci, S., Dantas, A., Williams, D., & Kemm, R. (2009). Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Advances in Physiology Education, 33(1), 60–71. doi: 10.1152/advan.00109.2007
  • Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 313–331. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001
  • Google. (2013). Google trends: Flipped classroom. Retrieved July 12, 2013, from http://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=%22flipped+classroom%22#q=flipped%20classroom&cmpt=q
  • Gosser, D., Cracolice, M., Kampmeier, J., Roth, V., Strozak, V., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2001). Peer-led team learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Guay, F., Ratelle, C., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233–240. doi: 10.1037/a0012758
  • Haak, D., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. doi: 10.1126/science.1204820
  • Huba, M., & Freed, J. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24(9), 759–766. doi: 10.1080/713837537
  • Lage, M., Platt, G., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. doi: 10.1080/00220480009596759
  • Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2011). Engaging students in learning: A review of a conceptual organiser. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 193–204. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.509761
  • Lord, S., Prince, M., Stefanou, C., Stolk, J., & Chen, J. (2012). The effect of different active learning environments on student outcomes related to lifelong learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(3), 606–620.
  • Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. doi: 10.1037/h0043158
  • Milman, N. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used. Distance Learning, 9(3), 85–87.
  • Moog, R.S., & Spencer, J. (2008). POGIL: Process oriented guided inquiry learning (Vol. 2). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Niemiec, C., & Ryan, R. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. doi: 10.1177/1477878509104318
  • Owston, R., Lupshenyuk, D., & Wideman, H. (2011). Lecture capture in large undergraduate classes: Student perceptions and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.006
  • Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.
  • Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a ‘flipped classroom’ model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 1–5. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7610196
  • Pintrich, P. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. doi: 10.1037/a0026838
  • Russell, T. (2013). The no significant difference phenomenon. Retrieved July 12, 2013, from http://www.nosignificantdifference.org/
  • Ryan, R., & Connell, J. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internationalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Ryan, R., Stiller, J., & Lynch, J. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 226–249. doi: 10.1177/027243169401400207
  • Sheard, J., Carbone, A., & Hurst, A. (2010). Student engagement in first year of an ICT degree: Staff and student perceptions. Computer Science Education, 20(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1080/08993400903484396
  • Strayer, J. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Strayer, J. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193.
  • Sweet, M., & Michaelsen, L. (Eds.). (2012). Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Tamim, R.M., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P.C., & Schmid, R.F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. doi: 10.3102/0034654310393361
  • Thaman, R., Dhillon, S., Saggar, S., Gupta, M., & Kaur, H. (2013). Promoting active learning in respiratory physiology – Positive student perception and improved outcomes. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 3(1), 27–34.
  • Torgerson, C.J. (2006). Publication bias: The Achilles heel of systematic reviews? British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 89–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00332.x
  • Utman, C. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(2), 170–182. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0102_4
  • Vallerand, R., Fortier, M., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1161–1176. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
  • Van Nuland, H., Taris, T., Boekaerts, M., & Martens, R. (2012). Testing the hierarchical SDT model: The case of performance-oriented classrooms. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 467–482. doi: 10.1007/s10212-011-0089-y
  • Williams, G., & Deci, E. (1996). Internationalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767–779. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.