Students’ ways of experiencing writing a bachelor’s thesis: a phenomenographic interview study

References

• Aglen, B. (2016). Pedagogical strategies to teach bachelor students evidence-based practice: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 36, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjawi, R., Kent, F., Broadbent, J., Tai, J. H.-M., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2021). Feedback that works: A realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1894115
   Google Scholar
• Åkerlind, G. S. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.642845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akister, J., Isabel, W., & Maynard, A. (2009). Group supervision of undergraduate dissertations. Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 4(2), 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Altınmakas, D., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwin, P., Abbas, A., & McLean, M. (2017). How does completing a dissertation transform undergraduate students’ understandings of disciplinary knowledge? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1154501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (2000). Achieving empathy and engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A., Zanchetta, M., Velasco, D., Pon, G., & Hassan, A. (2015). Building a scholar in writing (BSW): A model for developing students’ critical writing skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(6), 524–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, S., Ward, L., & Walter, R. (2017). Exploring nursing students’ experiences of learning using phenomenography: A literature review. The Journal of Nursing Education, 56(10), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20170918-03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, S. (1997). On phenomenography, learning and teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160203
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, C. S. (1994). Reflections on the experience of the phenomenographic interview. In R. Ballantyne, C Bruce (Eds.), Phenomenography: Philosophy and Practice conference, QUT, 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, L., & Tuck, J. (2020). Understanding student writing from lecturers’ perspectives: Acknowledging pedagogic complexity to support transformative practices in context. Studies in Higher Education, 46(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1711043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delahunt, B., Everitt-Reynolds, A., Maguire, M., & Sheridan, F. (2012). Situating academic writing in the undergraduate curriculum: Some reflections. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/53ed/3062c9680929e91997f89e6aae3df975d80e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, R., Dallat, J., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2013). Supervising and writing a good undergraduate dissertation. Bentham Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, T. (2010). Facilitating writing from sources: A focus on both process and product. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., Samara, A. & Westrheim, K. (2006). Multivoiced supervision of master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 31(3), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EHEA. (1999). The Bologna declaration of 19 June 1999. 6. http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/Ministerial_conferences/02/8/1999_Bologna_Declaration_English_553028.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Forster, M. (2015). Six ways of experiencing information literacy in nursing: The findings of a phenomenographic study. Nurse Education Today, 35(1), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbank, P., & Penketh, C. (2009). Student autonomy and reflections on researching and writing the undergraduate dissertation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(4), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903272537
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, M., & Zuccoli, F. (2014). Thesis projects in teacher training: A possibility for research-training. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1971–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.505
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, F. (2013). Study support and the development of academic literacy in higher education: A phenomenographic analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, P., Johnson, R., & Poudrier, C. (2010). Measuring educational quality by appraising theses and dissertations: Pitfalls and remedies. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.491905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henricson, M., Fridlund, B., Mårtensson, J., & Hedberg, B. (2018). The validation of the supervision of thesis questionnaire (STQ). Nurse Education Today, 65, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordal, M., Eriksson, H., Salzmann-Erikson, M., & Mazaheri, M. (2021). Escorting students into responsibility and autonomy (ESRA): A model for supervising degree projects. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S307169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Webster, B. J., & Chan, W. S. C. (2020). Refocusing the 3P model to incorporate a learning and teaching environment and graduate attributes. Educational Psychology, 40(5), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1732304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle, E., Ball, S. C., & Maliszewski, G. (2013). Writing approaches of nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle, E., & Guarino, A. J. (2003). A multidimensional approach to understanding college writing process. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000060138
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, S. M., & Halvarsson, M. (2009). Students’ expectations, concerns and comprehensions when writing theses as part of their nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 29(5), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, S. M., & Robertsson, B. (2013). Writing a bachelor thesis generates transferable knowledge and skills useable in nursing practice. Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1406–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.10.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1997). The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education. Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S.F.S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284706
   Google Scholar
• McCune, V. (2004). Development of first-year students’ conceptions of essay writing. Higher Education, 47(3), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000016419.61481.f9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines, 4412–4424. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Mimirinis, M., & Ahlberg, K. (2021). Variation in education doctoral students’ conceptions of university teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. M., McMillan, D. E., Lobchuk, M. M., & Nickel, N. C. (2021). Writing activities and the hidden curriculum in nursing education. Nursing Inquiry, 28(3), e12407. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. M., McMillan, D. E., & Rabbani, R. (2019). An exploration of writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulatory behaviours in undergraduate writing. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8175
   Google Scholar
• Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312438529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., & Webb, C. (1994). Relating the process of undergraduate essay writing to the finished product. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331381987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roderick, R. (2019). Self-Regulation and rhetorical problem solving: How graduate students adapt to an unfamiliar writing project. Written Communication, 36(3), 410–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319843511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runesson Kempe, U. (2022). Key note-presentation. EARLI/SIG 9-Conference, Stockholm University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Samara, A. (2006). Group supervision in graduate education: A process of supervision skill development and text improvement. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600610362
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström, B., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2002). Applying phenomenography in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02375.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfors-Hayes, T., Hult, H., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2013). A phenomenographic approach to research in medical education. Medical Education, 47(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, J. M., & Maynes, N. (2021). Rigorous phenomenography: A conceptual model. Journal of Studies in Education, 11(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v11i2.18496
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, L. (1997). Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160204
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good research practice. https://www.vr.se/download/18.5639980c162791bbfe697882/1555334908942/Good-Research-Practice_VR_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M. (2016). Phenomenography: The development and application of an innovative research design in higher education research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1010284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utriainen, K., Ahonen, S. M., Kangasniemi, M., & Liikanen, E. (2011). Health science students’ experiences of group supervision of the bachelor’s thesis. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(4), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20110228-04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, K., & Gasiorek, J. (2012). Effects of an efficacy-focused approach to academic writing on students’ perceptions of themselves as writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar