Exploring teacher support for a content and language integrated modern languages curriculum

References

• Bloemert, J., Jansen, E., & van de Grift, W. (2016). Exploring EFL literature approaches in Dutch secondary education. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2015.1136324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2018). The common European framework of reference for languages (CEFR). https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/table-1-cefr-3.3-common-reference-levels-global-scale
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R. (2016). Language and content ‘integration’: The affordances of additional languages as a tool within a single curriculum space. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 388–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1125528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014). “You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graus, J., & Coppen, P.-A. (2016). Student teacher beliefs on grammar instruction. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 571–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815603237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaal, A. (2018). Mvt-onderwijs nu en in de toekomst. Opvattingen van docenten en vakdidactici. https://modernevreemdetalen.vakdidactiekgw.nl/mvt-onderwijs-nu-en-in-de-toekomst/
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. (2007). Participatory action research and the public sphere. In P. Ponte & B. H. J. Smit (Eds.), The quality of practitioners research. Reflections on the positions of the researcher and the researched (pp. 9–27). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903190_003.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4–17. http://www.icrj.eu/index.php?vol=12&page=73
   Google Scholar
• Mearns, T. (2012). Using CLIL to enhance pupils’ experience of learning and raise attainment in German and health education: A teacher research project. The Language Learning Journal, 40(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2011.621212
   Google Scholar
• Mearns, T. (2015). Chicken, egg or a bit of both? Motivation in bilingual education (TTO) in the Netherlands [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Aberdeen. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.646095?
   Google Scholar
• Mearns, T., & de Graaff, R. (2018). Bilingual education and CLIL in the Netherlands. The paradigm and the pedagogy. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.00002.int
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearns, T., de Graaff, R., & Coyle, D. (2017). Motivation for or from bilingual education? A comparative study of learner views in the Netherlands. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1405906
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meesterschapsteam mvt. (2018). Visie op de toekomst van het curriculum Moderne Vreemde Talen (Vakdidactiek Geesteswetenschappen Ed.). Vakdidactiek Geesteswetenschappen.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, P. (2012). 5 whys analysis. https://www.toolshero.com/problem-solving/5-whys-analysis/
   Google Scholar
• Ponte, P., & Smit, B. H. J. (2007). Introduction. Doing research and being researched? In P. Ponte & B. H. J. Smit (Eds.), The quality of practitioners research. Reflections on the positions of the researcher and the researched (pp. 1–8). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903190_002.
   Google Scholar
• Rádai, P., Bernaus, M., Matei, G., Sassen, D., & Heyworth, F. (2003). The status of language educators.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2013). CLIL implementation: From policy-makers to individual initiatives. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schat, E., de Graaff, R., & van der Knaap, E. (2018). Intercultureel en taalgericht literatuuronderwijs bij de moderne vreemde talen; Een enquête onder docenten Duits, Frans en Spaans in Nederland. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, 19(3), 13–25. http://www.lt-tijdschriften.nl/ojs/index.php/ltt/article/view/1841
   Google Scholar
• Stichting Leerplanontwikkeling. (2013). Examenprogramma moderne vreemde talen en literatuur havo/vwo.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvén, L. K. (2007). Are the Simpsons welcome in the CLIL classroom? Vienna English Working Papers, 16(3), 53–59. https://anglistik.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/i_anglistik/Department/Views/Uploads/Views_0703_specissue.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ting, Y. L. T. (2010). CLIL appeals to how the brain likes its information: Examples from CLIL-(neuro)science. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 3–18. http://www.icrj.eu/13/article1.html
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, E., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., Unsworth, S., van Kemenade, A. M. C., & Meijer, P. C. (2018). Unravelling upper-secondary school teachers’ beliefs about language awareness: From conflicts to challenges in the EFL context. Language Awareness, 27(4), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1523910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Driel, J., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kampen, E., Mearns, T., Meirink, J., Admiraal, W., & Berry, A. (2018). How do we measure up? A review of Dutch CLIL subject pedagogies against an international backdrop. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.18004.kam
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kampen, E., Meirink, J., Admiraal, W., & Berry, A. (2017). Do we all share the same goals for content and language integrated learning (CLIL)? Specialist and practitioner perceptions of ‘ideal’ CLIL pedagogies in the Netherlands. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism . Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1411332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westhoff, G. (2012). Mesten en meten in leesvaardigheidstraining. Leesvaardigheidsonderwijs en examentraining zijn twee verschillende dingen. Levende Talen Magazine, 4, 17–21. http://www.lt-tijdschriften.nl/ojs/index.php/ltm/article/view/421
   Google Scholar