What is meant by inclusion? On the effects of different definitions on attitudes toward inclusive education

References

• Ainscow, M., and M. César. 2006. “Inclusive Education Ten Years after Salamanca: Setting the Agenda.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 21: 231–238. doi:10.1007/BF03173412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., T. Booth, A. Dyson, P. Farrell, J. Frankham, F. Gallannaugh, A. Howes, and R. Smith. 2006. Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Antonak, R. F., and H. Livneh. 2000. “Measurement of Attitudes Towards Persons with Disabilities.” Disability and Rehabilitation 22: 211–224. doi:10.1080/096382800296782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., and B. Norwich. 2002. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Integration/Inclusion: A Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 17: 129–147. doi:10.1080/08856250210129056.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, V., and G. Bless. 2014. “Erfassung der Einstellungen zur schulischen Integration von Lehrpersonen: Übersetzung und Erprobung der ORI und ATIES Skalen.” Zeitschrift Für Bildungsforschung 4: 209–226. doi:10.1007/s35834-014-0110-z.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, G., J. Hunter, B. Sigurjonsdottir, and S. D’Alessio. 2011. Key Principles for Promoting Quality in Inclusive Education - Recommendations for Practice. Odense, Denmark: EADSNE.
   Google Scholar
• Buell, M. J., R. Hallam, M. Gamel-Mccormick, and S. Scheer. 1999. “A Survey of General and Special Education Teachers ’ Perceptions and Inservice Needs Concerning Inclusion.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 46: 37–41. doi:10.1080/103491299100597.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, A., S. J. Pijl, and A. Minnaert. 2011. “Regular Primary Schoolteachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15: 331–353. doi:10.1080/13603110903030089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. 2006. “What are Implicit Measures and Why are We Using Them?” In The Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction, edited by R. W. Wiers and A. W. Stacy, 11–28. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. 2014. “A Response to Göransson and Nilholm.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29: 282–283. doi:10.1080/08856257.2014.933542.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., and D. R.Roskos- Ewoldsen. 2005. “Acting as We Feel : When and How Attitudes Guide Behavior.” In Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives, edited by T. C. Brock and M. C. Green, 41-62. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., and M. A. Olson. 2003. “Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Use.” Annual Review of Psychology 54: 297–327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, F. 2018. “The Value of Inclusion.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 52: 54–70. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasman, L. R., and D. Albarracín. 2006. “Forming Attitudes that Predict Future Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Attitude-Behavior Relation.” Psychological Bulletin 132: 778–822. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göransson, K., and C. Nilholm. 2014. “Conceptual Diversities and Empirical Shortcomings – A Critical Analysis of Research on Inclusive Education.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29: 265–280. doi:10.1080/08856257.2014.933545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, P. 2014. “Empirical Shortcomings? A Comment on Kerstin Göransson and Claes Nilholm, ‘ Conceptual Diversities and Empirical Shortcomings - A Critical Analysis of Research on Inclusive Education’.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29: 284–286. doi:10.1080/08856257.2014.933548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, D. A., and R. H. Fazio. 1989. “Biased Processing as a Function of Attitude Accessibility: Making Objective Judgments Subjectively.” Social Cognition 7: 51–66. doi:10.1521/soco.1989.7.1.51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krischler, M., I.M. Pit-ten Cate, and S Krolak-Schwerdt. 2018. “Mixed Stereotype Content and Attitudes toward Students with Special Educational Needs and Their Inclusion in Regular Schools in Luxembourg.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 75: 59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, S., and K. Dedering. 2018. “The Idea of Inclusion: Conceptual and Empirical Diversities in Germany.” Improving Schools 21: 19–31. doi:10.1177/1365480217707835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautenbach, F., and F. Antoniewicz. 2018. “Ambivalent Implicit Attitudes Towards Inclusion in Preservice PE Teachers: The Need for Assessing Both Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Towards Inclusion.” Teaching and Teacher Education 72: 24–32. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limbach-Reich, A., J. J. W. Powell, and M. Brendel. 2015. “Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.” In The Praeger International Handbook of Special Education, edited by L. M. Wehmeyer and J. R. Patton, 296–309. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Limbach-Reich, A., and J. J. W. Powell. 2015. “Schülerinnen und Schüler mit besonderem Förderungsbedarf im luxemburgischen Bildungssystem.” In Bildungsbericht Luxemburg 2015, edited by T. Lentz and J. Bertemes, 91–97, 134, 150, 166. Vol. 1. Luxembourg: MENJE/University of Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, G. 2007. “Educational Psychology and the Effectiveness of Inclusive Education/Mainstreaming.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 1–24. doi:10.1348/000709906X156881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, C., V. Soriano, and A. Watkins, eds. 2003. Sonderpädagogische Förderung in Europa. Brussels: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
   Google Scholar
• MENJE. 2017. “Élèves à besoins éducatifs spécifiques ou particuliers.” Luxembourg. http://www.men.public.lu/catalogue-publications/themes-transversaux/dossiers-presse/2016-2017/170201-eleves-besoins.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MENJE. 2018. “Journal officiel du Grand Duché de Luxembourg, Mémorial A, N° 664 du 8 août 2018.” http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2018/07/20/a664/jo
   Google Scholar
• Morin, D., M. Rivard, A. G. Crocker, C. P. Boursier, and J. Caron. 2013. “Public Attitudes Towards Intellectual Disability: A Multidimensional Perspective.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57: 279–292. doi:10.1111/jir.12008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousouli, M., D. Kokaridas, N. Angelopoulou-Sakadami, and M. Aristotelous. 2009. “Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Children with Special Needs by Physical Education S Tudents.” International Journal of Special Education 24: 85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Nilholm, C., and K. Göransson. 2017. “What Is Meant by Inclusion? An Analysis of European and North American Journal Articles with High Impact.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 32: 437–451. doi:10.1080/08856257.2017.1295638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. 1994. “The Relationship between Attitudes to the Integration of Children with Special Educational Needs and Wider Socio-Political Views; a US-English Comparison.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 9: 91–106. doi:10.1080/0885625940090108.
   Google Scholar
• Pit-ten Cate, I.M. (2014). Inclusive education: The effect of teacher characteristics and school support on inclusive practice. FNR CORE project. http://fnr.lu/projects/inclusive-education-the-effectof-teacher-characteristics-and-school-support-on-inclusivepractice/.
   Google Scholar
• Pit-ten Cate, I.M., and M. Krischer (2018). "Inklusive Bildung aus der Sicht luxemburgischer Grundschullehrerinnen und –lehrer." In: Nationaler Bildungsbericht Luxemburg 2018, edited by T.Lentz, I.Baumann and A.Küpper (pp. 201–209). Esch-sur-Alzette, LU: Université du Luxembourg (LUCET) & SCRIPT.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. J. W., and A. Hadjar. 2018. “Schulische Inklusion in Deutschland, Luxemburg und der Schweiz: Aktuelle Bedingungen und Herausforderungen [Inclusive Schooling in Germany, Luxembourg and Switzerland].” In Leistung und Wohlbefinden in der Schule: Herausforderung Inklusion, edited by K. Rathmann and K. Hurrelmann, 46–65. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, J. J. W., B. Edelstein, and J. M. Blanck. 2016. “Awareness-Raising, Legitimation or Backlash? Effects of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Education Systems in Germany.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 14: 227–250. doi:10.1080/14767724.2014.982076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. G., and J. J. W. Powell. 2011. Comparing Special Education: Origins to Contemporary Paradoxes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruberg, C., and R. Porsch. 2017. “Einstellungen von Lehramtsstudierenden und Lehrkräften zur schulischen Inklusion.” Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik 63: 393. doi:10.3262/ZP1704393.
   Google Scholar
• Seifried, S., and V. Heyl. 2016. “Konstruktion und Validierung eines Einstellungsfragebogens zu Inklusion für Lehrkräfte (EFI-L).” Empirische Sonderpädagogik 1: 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Szumski, G., J. Smogorzewska, and M. Karwowski. 2017. “Academic Achievement of Students without Special Educational Needs in Inclusive Classrooms: A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Research Review 21: 33–54. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2006. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1994. The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Salamanca, Spain. Paris, France: UNESCO
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2000. Education for All 2000 Assessment: Global Synthesis. Paris, France: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, A. 2012. Teacher Education for Inclusion: Profile of Inclusive Teachers. Odense, Denmark: EADSNE.
   Google Scholar