Teachers’ professional learning experiences and their engagement in reflective practice: a replication study

References

• Andrews, D., & Lewis, M. (2007). Transforming practice from within: The power of the professional learning community. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth, and dilemmas (pp. 132–147). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory into practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. A. (2002). Standards reform in high-poverty schools: Managing conflict and building capacity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, B. B. (1987). The effectiveness of staff development training practices: A meta-analysis. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1990). Making the most of experience. Studies in Continuing Education, 12, 61–80. doi:10.1080/0158037900120201
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, C. D., Esmonde, I., Ross, J., Dookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1598–1608. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camburn, E. M. (2010). Embedded teacher learning opportunities as a site for reflective practice: An exploratory study. American Journal of Education, 116, 463–489. doi:10.1086/653624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camburn, E. M., Goldring, E., Sebastian, J., May, H., & Huff, J. (2016). An examination of the benefits, limitations, and challenges of conducting randomized experiments with principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 187–220. doi:10.1177/0013161X15617808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camburn, E. M., & Han, S. W. (2009). Investigating connections between distributed leadership and instructional change. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (pp. 25–45). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 347–373. doi:10.3102/01623737025004347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. doi:10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1990). Policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 233–239. doi:10.3102/01623737012003233
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343. doi:10.1111/tcre.2000.102.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., Moffitt, S. L., & Goldin, S. (2007). Policy and practice: The dilemma. American Journal of Education, 113, 515–548. doi:10.1086/518487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112. doi:10.3102/01623737024002081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225–249. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essential of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 257–281. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 207–236. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2302_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611. doi:10.2307/2392366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J. B., Bonk, C. J., & Hew, K. (2005). The tickit to teacher learning: Designing professional development according to situative principles. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 329–340. doi:10.2190/68XG-THRV-HT4D-ECA4
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research., 86, 945–980. doi:10.3102/0034654315626800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., & Blazar, D. (2016). Individualized coaching to improve teacher practice across grades and subjects: New experimental evidence. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0895904816631099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis., 36, 476–500. doi:10.3102/0162373713519496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. M., & Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1993). The design of replicated studies. The American Statistician, 47, 217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M., & McRobbie, C. (2005). The “whole approach”: An investigation of a school-based practicum model of teacher professional development in ICT. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 341–351. doi:10.2190/623G-MT8A-VC17-R1TA
   Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43, 304–316. doi:10.3102/0013189X14545513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17. doi:10.3102/0013189X017002013
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & Birman, B. F. (2003). Providing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. Science Educator, 12, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raver, C. C., Jones, S. M., Li-Grining, C. P., Metzger, M., Champion, K. M., & Sardin, L. (2008). Improving preschool classroom processes: Preliminary findings from a randomized trial implemented in Head Start settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 10–26. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C. R. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 230–253. doi:10.17763/haer.72.2.5631743606m15751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan, B., Correnti, R., Miller, R. J., & Camburn, E. M. (2009). School improvement by design: Lessons from a study of comprehensive school reform programs. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scher, L., & O’Reilly, F. (2009). Professional development for K–12 math and science teachers: What do we really know? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 209–249. doi:10.1080/19345740802641527
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, J. P. (1999). Professional development: Untangling the influence of work context on teacher learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 238–266. doi:10.1177/0013161X99352004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, D. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Principal, 77, 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963–980. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development (Educational Practices Series. No. 18). Brussels, Belgium: International Academy of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Educational_Practices/EdPractices_18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tremmel, R. (1993). Zen and the art of reflective practice in teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 63, 434–459. doi:10.17763/haer.63.4.m42704n778561176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79, 702–739. doi:10.3102/0034654308330970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar