1,550
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Motivational factors that influence student science achievement: a systematic literature review of TIMSS studies

ORCID Icon &
Pages 2921-2944 | Received 23 May 2020, Accepted 24 Oct 2020, Published online: 17 Nov 2020

Reference

  • Akıllı, M. (2015). Regression levels of selected affective factors on science achievement: A structural equation model with TIMSS 2011 Data. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 1-16.
  • Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Neitzel, C. (2019). Multiple points of access for supporting interest in science. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 312–352). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bae, C. L., DeBusk-Lane, M., Hayes, K. N., & Zhang, F. (2018b). Opportunities to Participate (OtP) in Science: Examining Differences Longitudinally and Across Socioeconomically Diverse Schools. Research in Science Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9797-5
  • Bae, C. L., & DeBusk-Lane, M. L. (2018a). Stability of motivation belief profiles middle school science: Links to classroom goal structures and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 91–104.
  • Bae, C. L., & Lai, M.. 2019. Opportunities to Participate (OtP) in science learning and student engagement: A mixed methods study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1128-1153. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-54277-001
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (pp. 3–604). Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  • Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 139–153.
  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
  • Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474–481.
  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  • Chen, S. K., Yeh, Y. C., Hwang, F. M., & Lin, S. S. (2013). The relationship between academic self-concept and achievement: A multicohort–multioccasion study. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.021
  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement andachievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
  • Foy, P., & Yin, L. (2015). Scaling the TIMSS 2015 achievement data. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015 (pp. 13.1–13.62). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Gao, S. (2014). Relationship between science teaching practices and students’ achievement in Singapore, Chinese Taipei, and the US: An analysis using TIMSS 2011 data. Frontiers of Education in China, 9(4), 519–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397039
  • Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., & Dicke, T. (2018). Cross-cultural generalizability of social and dimensional comparison effects on reading, math, and science self-concepts for primary school students using the combined PIRLS and TIMSS data. Learning and Instruction, 58, 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.007
  • Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53(1), 87–97.
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  • House, J. D., & Telese, J. A. (2017). Confidence in science and achievement outcomes of fourth-grade students in Korea: Results from the TIMSS 2011 assessment. Education, 137(4), 389–392.
  • Kline, R. B. (2012). Assumptions in structural equation modeling.
  • Lay, Y., & Chandrasegaran, C. (2016). The predictive effects of motivation toward learning science on TIMSS grade 8 students’ science achievement: A comparative study between Malaysia and Singapore. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2949–2959. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02315a
  • Lee, C. S., Hayes, K. N., Seitz, J. C., DiStefano, R., & O’Connor, D. (2016). Examining motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452
  • Leong, K. E., Tan, P. P., Lau, P. L., & Yong, S. L. (2018). Exploring the relationship between motivation and science achievement of secondary students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26(4), 2243–2258.
  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Wormington, S. V. (2019). An integrative perspective for studying motivation in relation to engagement and learning. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 739--753). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Liou, P. Y. (2014). Examining the big-fish-little-pond effect on students’ self-concept of learning science in Taiwan based on the TIMSS databases. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 2009–2028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.889331
  • Liou, P. Y. (2017). Profiles of adolescents’ motivational beliefs in science learning and science achievement in 26 countries: Results from TIMSS 2011 data. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.11.006
  • Liou, P. Y., & Liu, E. Z. F. (2015). An analysis of the relationships between Taiwanese eighth and fourth-graders’ motivational beliefs and science achievement in TIMSS 2011. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9381-x
  • Liou, P. Y., Wang, C. L., & Lin, J. J. (2019). Pathways of parental involvement through students’ motivational beliefs to science achievement. Educational Psychology, 39(7), 960–980.
  • Liu, C. C., & Wang, T. Y. (2019). A study of factors affecting science achievements of junior high school female students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.39
  • Marsh, H. W. (2014). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In Psychological perspectives on the self, volume 4 (pp. 71–110). Psychology Press.
  • Marsh, H. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–125.
  • Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D., & Barnes, J. (1985). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relations with sex and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 581–596.
  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). The big-fish-little-pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 631–669. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306728
  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  • National Academy of Sciences. (2008). Science, evolution and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
  • Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2015). Young children’s motivation for learning science. In Research in early childhood science education (pp. 7–34). Springer.
  • Quinn, D. M., & Cooc, N. (2015). Science achievement gaps by gender and race/ethnicity in elementary and middle school: Trends and predictors. Educational Researcher, 44(6), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15598539
  • Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2019). Expectancy-value theory and its relevance for student motivation and learning. In K.A. Renninger, & S.E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 617–644). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–56. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.
  • Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 4-6). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
  • Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607
  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
  • Tsai, L. T., & Yang, C. C. (2015). Hierarchical effects of school-, classroom-, and student-level factors on the science performance of eighth-grade Taiwanese students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1166–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1022625
  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456
  • Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138
  • Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361209
  • Wang, C. L., & Liou, P. Y. (2017). Students’ motivational beliefs in science learning, school motivational contexts, and science achievement in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 898–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1310410
  • Wang, C. L., & Liou, P. Y. (2018). Patterns of motivational beliefs in the science learning of total, high-, and low-achieving students: Evidence of Taiwanese TIMSS 2011 data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(4), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9797-3
  • Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 3–25.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., Freedman-Doan, D., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451–469.
  • Yetisir, M. I. (2014). The multilevel effects of student and classroom factors on the science achievement of eighth-graders in Turkey. Education and Science, 39(172), 108–120.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.