Food in science, science in food – Interdisciplinarity in science/chemistry and home economics lower secondary curricula across three countries

References

• Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borkenhagen, C. (2017). Evidence-based creativity: Working between art and science in the field of fine dining. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 630–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717725204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brante, G., & Brunosson, A. (2014). To double a recipe – Interdisciplinary teaching and learning of mathematical content knowledge in a home economics setting. Education Inquiry, 5(2), 23925. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v5.23925
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, M., & Puttick, G. (2022). “Because subjects don’t exist in a bubble”: Middle school teachers enacting an interdisciplinary curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09951-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Cooke, C., Davies, R., Gray, D., & Trowsdale, J. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing steam education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: How can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education? British Educational Research Association (BERA).
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin, B. (2001). The primacy of cognition – or of perception? A phenomenological critique of the theoretical bases of science education. Science & Education, 10(5), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011252913699
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin, B. (2003). The ontological reversal: A figure of thought of importance for science education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308606
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi/Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Dolfing, R., Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M. W., Pilot, A., & Vermunt, J. D. (2021). Strategies to support teachers’ professional development regarding sense-making in context-based science curricula. Science Education, 105(1), 127–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Guilfoyle, L., & Park, W. (2022). Science and religious education teachers’ views of argumentation and its teaching. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09966-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EURYDICE. (2019, 12 August 2021). Norway to implement new curricula at primary and secondary school levels in 2020. European Commission. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/norway-implement-new-curricula-primary-and-secondary-school-levels-2020_en
   Google Scholar
• Fooladi, E. (2020a). Between education and opinion-making - dialogue between Didactic/Didaktik models from science education and science communication in the times of a pandemic. Science & Education, 29(5), 1117–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00156-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fooladi, E. (2020b). Taste as science, aesthetic experience and inquiry. In P. Burnard & L. Colucci-Gray (Eds.), Why science and art creativities matter: STEAM (re-)configurings for future-making education (pp. 358–380). Brill | Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004421585_020.
   Google Scholar
• Fooladi, E., & Hopia, A. (2013). Culinary precisions as a platform for interdisciplinary dialogue. Flavour, 2(6), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-2-6
   Google Scholar
• Fooladi, E., Hopia, A., Lasa, D., & Arboleya, J.-C. (2019). Chefs and researchers: Culinary practitioners’ views on interaction between gastronomy and sciences. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 15, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2018.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fooladi, E. C. (2021). Teaching argumentation and inquiry through culinary claims. In R. Burke, A. Kelly, C. Lavelle, & H. This vo Kientza (Eds.), Handbook of molecular gastronomy - Scientific foundations, educational practices, and culinary applications (pp. 643–650). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halinen, I., Harmanen, M., & Mattila, P. (2015). Making sense of complexity of the world today: Why Finland is introducing multiliteracy in teaching and learning. In V. Bozsik (Ed.), Improving literacy skills across learning. CIDREE yearbook 2015 (pp. 136–153). Hungarian Institute for Educational Research and Development (HIERD).
   Google Scholar
• Heldke, L. (1992). Foodmaking as a thoughtful practice. In D. W. Curtin, & L. Heldke (Eds.), Cooking, eating, thinking: Transformative philosophies of food (pp. 203–229). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herranen, J., Fooladi, E. C., & Milner-Bolotin, M. (2021). Editorial: Special issue “Promoting STEAM in Education”. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.2.1559
   Google Scholar
• Herranen, J., Kousa, P., Fooladi, E., & Aksela, M. (2019). Inquiry as a context-based practice – A case study of pre-service teachers` beliefs and implementation of inquiry in context-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1977–1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1655679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopia, A., & Fooladi, E. (2019). A pinch of culinary science - Boiling an egg inside out and other kitchen tales. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• IFHE. (2008). Home economics in the 21st century position statement. International Federation for Home Economics. https://www.ifhe.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/IFHE_Position_Paper_HE_21st_Century.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. (2009). Transfer of learning in the learning society: How can the barriers between different learning spaces be surmounted, and how can the gap between learning inside and outside schools be bridged? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370902756986
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Karisan, D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Contextualization of nature of science within the socioscientific issues framework: A review of research. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 5(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.270186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. (2012). New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: Using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., & Ritchie, S. M. (2012). Learning science through real-world contexts. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 24, pp. 69–79). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_6
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Examining tensions in the socioscientific issues classroom: Students’ border crossings into a new culture of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. L. T. (2011). Home economics as an integrated, holistic system: Revisiting Bubolz and Sontag's 1988 human ecology approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00920.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. L. T. (2016). Transdisciplinary professionalism for home economics. International Journal of Home Economics, 9(1), 54–71.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Campos, V., Franco-Mariscal, A.-J., & Blanco-López, Á. (2020). Integration of scientific practices into daily living contexts: A framework for the design of teaching-learning sequences. International Journal of Science Education, 42(15), 2574–2600. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1821932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, D. (2010). Losing the “purity” of subjects? Understanding teachers’ perceptions of integrating subjects into learning areas. Education as Change, 14(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2010.518001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirier, S., Remsen, M. A., & Sager, M. (2017). Teaching and learning in family and consumer sciences education: Thriving in challenging times. International Journal of Home Economics, 10(2), 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Pountney, R., & McPhail, G. (2017). Researching the interdisciplinary curriculum: The need for ‘translation devices’. British Educational Research Journal, 43(6), 1068–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadier, T. (2004). Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies. Futures, 36(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2011). Learning science in an integrated classroom: Finding balance through theoretical triangulation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.509516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, D. (2006). Cooking skill, the senses, and memory: The fate of practical knowledge. In E. Edwards, C. Gosden, & R. B. Phillips (Eds.), Sensible objects: Colonialism, museums and material culture (pp. 87–118). Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2011/2019). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time center. Swedish National Agency for Education. https://www.skolverket.se/andra-sprak-other-languages/english-engelska
   Google Scholar
• The Finnish National Board of Education. (2014). National curriculum for basic education. The Finnish National Board of Education. https://www.oph.fi/en
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2006/2013). National curriculum for knowledge promotion in primary and secondary education and training. The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. https://www.udir.no/in-english
   Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2020). National curriculum for primary, lower secondary and upper secondary education. The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. https://www.udir.no/in-english/curricula-in-english
   Google Scholar
• This, H. (2009). Molecular gastronomy, a scientific look at cooking. Accounts of Chemical Research, 42(5), 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar8002078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomisto, M. (2021). Unpublished Work.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomisto, M., Haapaniemi, J., & Fooladi, E. (2017). Close neighbours, different interests? Comparing three Nordic Home Economics curricula. International Journal of Home Economics, 10(2), 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Turkki, K. (2015). Envisioning literacy to promote sustainable wellbeing. In V. W. Thoresen, D. Doyle, J. Klein, & R. J. Didham (Eds.), Responsible living: Concepts, education and future perspectives (pp. 151–178). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15305-6_11
   Google Scholar
• Vega, C., & Ubbink, J. (2008). Molecular gastronomy: A food fad or science supporting innovative cuisine? Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19(7), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venville, G., Rennie, L., & Wallace, J. (2004). Decision making and sources of knowledge: How students tackle integrated tasks in science, technology and mathematics. Research in Science Education, 34(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000033762.75329.9b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venville, G., Rennie, L. J., & Wallace, J. (2012). Curriculum integration: Challenging the assumption of school science as powerful knowledge. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 24, pp. 737–749). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_49
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G. J., Wallace, J., Rennie, L. J., & Malone, J. A. (2002). Curriculum integration: Eroding the high ground of science as a school subject? Studies in Science Education, 37(1), 43–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560177
   Google Scholar
• Wei, B., & Long, F. (2021). Teaching chemistry in context: What we know from teachers’ lesson plans. International Journal of Science Education, 43(8), 1208–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1905906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & Education, 29(1), 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar