Actualizing concept without language: a diffractive analysis of educational practice for children with disabilities with handmade manipulative materials in Japan

References

• Alaimo, S. (2008). Trans-corporeal feminisms and the ethical space of nature. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 237–264). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., & Bigby, C. (2016). Empowering people with intellectual disabilities to challenge stigma. In K. Scior & S. Werner (Eds.), Intellectual disability and stigma: Stepping out from the margins (pp. 165–177). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). A vitalist stopover on the way to a new materialism. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 47–69). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley, G. (1977). The principles of human knowledge: With other writings. Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office & Government of Japan. (2013, April 27). Act for eliminating discrimination against persons with disabilities. https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/3052
   Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2008). On not becoming man: The materialist politics of unactualized potential. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 52–84). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cologon, K. (2020). Is inclusive education really for everyone? Family stories of children and young people labelled with “severe and multiple” or “profound” “disabilities. Research Papers in Education, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. (2010). Materialities of experience. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 178–200). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas, E. (2017). Karen Barad’s quantum ontology and posthuman ethics: Rethinking the concept of relationality. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press. (original work published 1972)
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press. (original work published 1980).
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, T. (2015). The critical role of task design in lesson study. In A. Watson & M. Ohtani (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study (pp. 273–286). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, T. (2016). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: A critical process of Lesson Study. ZDM, 48(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2001). ‘Learning difficulties,’ the social model of disability and impairment: Challenging epistemologies. Disability & Society, 16(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590120035816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., & Rapley, M. (2001). How do you understand “learning disabilities”? Towards a social theory of impairment. Mental Retardation, 39(3), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2001)039<0229:HDYULD>2.0.CO;2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Günther-Hanssen, A. (2020). A swing and a child: How scientific phenomena can come to matter for preschool children’s emergent science identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(4), 885–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09980-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther-Hanssen, A., Danielsson, A. T., & Andersson, K. (2020). How does gendering matter in preschool science. Gender and Education, 32(5), 608–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1632809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield-Hill, S., & Zara, C. (2019). Complicating childhood-nature relations: Negotiated, spiritual and destructive encounters. Geoforum, 98, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hekman, S. (2008). Constructing the ballast: An ontology for feminism. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 85–119). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2009). Unimaginable bodies: Intellectual disability, performance and becomings. Brill Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to education research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y. (2017). Thinking without method. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 666–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2008). The anthropology of assemblages. Art Journal, 67(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2008.10791291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy (contesting early childhood). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112456001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H., & Palmer, A. (2013). A more “livable” school? A diffractive analysis of the performative enactments of girls’ ill-/well-being with(in) school environments. Gender and Education, 25(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.829909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation?: Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
   Google Scholar
• Mcphie, J. (2018). I knock at the stone’s front door: Performative pedagogies beyond the human story. Parallax, 24(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1496581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVittie, C., Goodall, K. E., & McKinlay, A. (2008). Resisting having learning disabilities by managing relative abilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(4), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2008.00507.x
   Google Scholar
• Murris, K. (2016). The posthuman child: Educational transformation through philosophy with picturebooks. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nakken, H., & Vlaskamp, C. (2007). A need for a taxonomy for profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4(2), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00104.x
   Google Scholar
• Nayer, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2009). Understanding disability: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, & science. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddington, S., & Price, D. (2018). Pedagogy of new materialism: Advancing the educational inclusion agenda for children and youth with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 33, 465–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, G., & Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadology and subjectivity: Deleuze, Guattari and critical disability studies. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory (pp. 161–178). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. An Ashgate Book.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2017). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (5th ed., pp. 195–203). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. A., & Dunkley, R. (2018). Technology-nonhuman-child assemblages: Reconceptualising rural childhood roaming. Children’s Geographies, 16(3), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2017.1407406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving in the classroom. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, A. (2014). The role of the knowledgeable other in lesson study: Examining the final comments of experienced lesson study practitioners. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 4–21.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar