Mobile-assisted or paper-based? The influence of the reading medium on the reading comprehension of English as a foreign language

References

• Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2002). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosentha, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 285–310). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, J., Basaraba, D., Tindal, G., & Carriveau, R. S. (2009). They read, but how well do they understand? An empirical look at the nuances of measuring reading comprehension. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508408330082
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D. (2017). Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 154–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S., Calixte, R. M., & Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 590–604. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, T. (2001). Extensive reading: Speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1(1). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.3793&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463–494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3586295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botero, G. G., Questier, F., Cincinnato, S., He, T., & Zhu, C. (2018). Acceptance and usage of mobile assisted language learning by higher education students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 426–451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burford, S., & Park, S. (2014). The impact of mobile tablet devices on human information behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 70(4), 622–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2012-0123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, W. C., & Ku, Y. M. (2015). The effects of note-taking skills instruction on elementary students’ reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(4), 278–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.886175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, M. M., & Lin, M. C. (2019). Experimental study on strategy-oriented web-based English instruction for EFL students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), 1238–1257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117739410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., & An, H. (2020). The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1769–1789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Zhang, Y., & Hu, J. (2021). Synergistic effects of instruction and affect factors on high- and low-ability disparities in elementary students’ reading literacy. Reading and Writing, 34(1), 199–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10070-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., & Hu, J. (2021). Discrimination of the contextual features of top performers in scientific literacy using a machine learning approach. Research in Science Education, 51, 129–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9835-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, E., & De Leeuw, M. (1965). Read better, read faster. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11(7), 513–578. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40013635.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fry, E. B. (1963). Teaching faster reading: A manual. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gheytasi, M., Azizifar, A., & Gowhary, H. (2015). The effect of smartphone on the reading comprehension proficiency of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 225–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.510
   Google Scholar
• Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Leech, N. L. (2017). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Colón, M., Frumuselu, A. D., & Curell, H. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning to enhance L2 reading comprehension: A selection of implementation studies between 2012–2017. Interactive Learning Environments, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813179
   Google Scholar
• Haddock, G., Foad, C., Saul, V., Brown, W., & Thompson, R. (2019). The medium can influence the message: Print-based versus digital reading influences how people process different types of written information. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 111, 443–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halamish, V., & Elbaz, E. (2020). Children’s reading comprehension and metacomprehension on screen versus on paper. Computers & Education, 145, 103737. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazaea, A. N., & Alzubi, A. A. (2018). Impact of mobile assisted language learning on learner autonomy in EFL reading context. Journal of Language and Education, 4(2), 48–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-2-48-58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. K., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, J., & Yu, R. (2021). The effects of ICT-based social media on adolescents’ digital reading performance: A longitudinal study of PISA 2009, PISA 2012, PISA 2015 and PISA 2018. Computers & Education, 175, 104342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. C. (2013). E-reading and e-discussion: EFL learners’ perceptions of an e-book reading program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 258–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.656313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. C., Chern, C. L., & Lin, C. C. (2009). EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., & Fu, Q. K. (2019). Trends in the research design and application of mobile language learning: A review of 2007–2016 publications in selected SSCI journals. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 567–581. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1486861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacson, S. A. (2017). The impact of interface on ESL reading comprehension and strategy use: A comparison of e-books and paper texts. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 850–861. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, M. A., & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children’s reading of informational material. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-003-8128-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension theory as a guide for the design of thoughtful questions. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200501000-00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H., & Wada, N. (2012). Mobile assisted language learning in university EFL courses in Japan: Developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335
   Google Scholar
• Lai, S. F., Li, C. H., & Amster, R. (2013). Strategically smart or proficiency-driven? An investigation of reading strategy use of EFL college students in relation to language proficiency. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 6(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v6i1.7606
   Google Scholar
• Latini, N., Bråtena, I., Anmarkruda, Ø., & Salmerónb, L. (2019). Investigating effects of reading medium and reading purpose on behavioral engagement and textual integration in a multiple text context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101797. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latini, N., Bråten, I., & Salmerón, L. (2020). Does reading medium affect processing and integration of textual and pictorial information? A multimedia eye-tracking study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101870. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson-Body, A., Willoughby, L., Lawson-Body, L., & Tamandja, E. M. (2020). Students’ acceptance of E-books: An application of UTAUT. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1463577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-C., Lin, V., Liu, G.-Z., Kou, X., Kulikova, A., & Lin, W. (2020). Mobile-assisted reading development: A review from the activity theory perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(8), 833–864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1594919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., & Huang, X. (2016). Reading on the move: A study of reading behavior of undergraduate smartphone users in China. Library & Information Science Research, 38(3), 235–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J. F., Epstein, I., & Fayard, P. (2003). Effects of online reading on popular science comprehension. Science Communication, 25(2), 99–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547003259209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, A. J. (2016). The confluence of language assessment and mixed methods. In A. J. Moeller, J. W. Cresswell, & N. Saville (Eds.), Second language assessment and mixed methods research (pp. 3–16). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–10. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kouider_Mokhtari/publication/285641803_Measuring_ESL_students%27_awareness_of_reading_strategies/links/5666234608ae418a786f3da5/Measuring-ESL-students-awareness-of-reading-strategies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., Van Den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 488–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupley, W. H., & Blair, T. R. (1983). Reading diagnosis and remediation: Classroom and clinic (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Şad, S. N., Özer, N., Yakar, Ü., & Öztürk, F. (2020). Mobile or hostile? Using smartphones in learning English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770292
   Google Scholar
• Shang, H. F. (2018). EFL medical students’ metacognitive strategy use for hypertext reading comprehension. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9156-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
   Google Scholar
• Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017a). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017b). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87, 1007–1041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, L. M., Alexander, P. A., & Berkowitz, L. E. (2019). Effects of processing time on comprehension and calibration in print and digital mediums. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1411877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, L. M., Alexander, P. A., & Silverman, A. B. (2018). Profiling reading in print and digital mediums. Learning and Instruction, 57, 5–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Støle, H., Mangen, A., & Schwippert, K. (2020). Assessing children’s reading comprehension on paper and screen: A mode-effect study. Computers & Education, 151, 103861. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykley, J. A. (2011). Harry potter power: Free your inner power. Interactive Publications Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tragant, E., Pinyana, À., Mackay, J., & Andria, M. (2021). Extending language learning beyond the EFL classroom through WhatsApp. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1854310
   Google Scholar
• Zou, X. L., & Ou, L. (2020). EFL reading test on mobile versus on paper: A study from metacognitive strategy use to test-media impacts. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32, 373–394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09320-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar