Scale-referenced, summative peer assessment in undergraduate interpreter training: self-reflection from an action researcher

References

• ArchMiller, A., J. Fieberg, J.D. Walker, and N. Holm. 2017. “Group Peer Assessment for Summative Evaluation in a Graduate-Level Statistics Course for Ecologists.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (8): 1208–1220. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1243219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale, R. 2015. “An Evaluation of Spoken Corpus-Based Resources in Undergraduate Interpreter Training.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 25 (1): 23–45. doi:10.1111/ijal.2015.25.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., K. Hughes, and A. Mylonas. 2002. “Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 427–441. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302.
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M. 1996. “Assessment 2000: Towards a Pluralistic Approach to Assessment.” In Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge, edited by M. Birenbaum and F. Dochy, 3–29. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and A. West. 2004. “Understanding the Rules of the Game: Marking Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 721–733. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227254.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and A. West. 2007. “Learning to Write in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions of an Intervention in Developing Understanding of Assessment Criteria.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (1): 77–89. doi:10.1080/13562510601102180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boéri, J., and J. de Manuel Jerez. 2011. “From Training Skilled Conference Interpreters to Educating Reflective Citizens: A Case Study of the Marius Action Research Project.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5 (1): 41–64. doi:10.1080/13556509.2011.10798811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bone, D. 1996. “Quality Management Is Collegiate Management: Improving Practice in a Special School.” In Quality Management in Education: Sustaining the Vision through Action Research, edited by P. Lomax and B. Douglas, 152–165. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bostock, S. 2004. “Motivation and Electronic Assessment.” In Effective Learning and Teaching in Computing, edited by A. Irons and S. Alexander, 86–99. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2000. “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22: 151–167. doi:10.1080/713695728.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., J. Bull, and M. Pendlebury. 1997. Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, C.M., and M.O. Finucane. 2013. “Spreading the Word: Service Learning in a Media Literacy Course.” Teaching Journalism & Mass Communication 3 (2). Accessed 10 December 2017. http://aejmc.us/spig/2013/spreading-the-word-service-learning-in-a-media-literacy-course/.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W., and V.L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2003. Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration and Processing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Draaijer, S., and P. Van Boxal. 2006. “Summative Peer Assessment Using ‘Turnitin’ and a Large Cohort of Students: A Case Study.” In Proceedings for the 10th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, edited by M. Danson, 167–180. Loughborough: Lougborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, S., and R. Ravid. 2013. Action Research in Education: A Practical Guide. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2001. Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, J., and E. Mowat. 2012. “Peer to Peer: The Full Cycle: Investigating Online Peer Assessment through Action Research.” In The Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on e-Learning, edited by H. Beldhuis, 150–157. Reading, UK: Academic Publishing International.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Turnbull, W. 2006. “The Influences of Teacher Knowledge and Authentic Formative Assessment on Student Learning in Technology Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 16 (1): 53–77. doi:10.1007/s10798-005-2109-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., and R. Lewis. 1998. Planning and Implementing Assessment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., E. Peeters, F. Dochy, P. Onghena, and K. Struyven. 2010. “Improving the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback for Learning.” Learning and Instruction 20: 304–315. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gile, D. 1995. “Fidelity Assessment in Consecutive Interpretation: An Experiment.” Target 7 (1): 151–164. doi:10.1075/target.7.1.12gil.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A.P. 2009. The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2014. Exploring Language Assessment and Testing: Language in Action. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S., and J. Napier. 2013. Research Methods in Interpreting: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, K., and G. Anderson. 2005. The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. 2015. Mixed Methods Applications in Action Research: From Methods to Community Action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Iwashita, N., and E. Grove. 2003. “A Comparison of Analytic and Holistic Scales in the Context of A Specific-Purpose Speaking Test.” Prospect 18 (3): 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., and G. Svingby. 2007. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Consequences.” Educational Research Review 2: 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1988. The Action Research Planner. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. 2017. “Theoretical Structuring of Cooperative Learning in Interpreter Training.” 國際言語文學 [A Journal Published by the International Society for Language and Literature] 36: 161–185.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, J., and S. Hong. 2012. “In Search of a Teaching Model for Graduate-Level Conference Interpreter Training: Focusing on Collaborative Learning in the English-into-Korean Consecutive Interpreting Classroom.” Interpreting and Translation Studies 16 (2): 85–114.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, A.M., D.M. Shuker, W.R. Cullen, D. Penney, R.F. Preziosi, and C.P. Wheater. 2008. “Relationships between Student Characteristics and Self-, Peer and Tutor Evaluations of Oral Presentations.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 179–190. doi:10.1080/02602930701292498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-B. 2013. “Undergraduate Trainee Interpreters’ Perceptions of Interpreter Training and Interpreting as A Profession: A Small-Scale Questionnaire Survey.” The Journal of Translation Studies 14 (4): 91–113. doi:10.15749/jts.2013.14.4.004.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-B. 2015. “Developing an Analytic Scale for Assessing Undergraduate Students’ Consecutive Interpreting Performances.” Interpreting 17 (2): 226–254. doi:10.1075/intp.17.2.04lee.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-B. 2017a. “University Students’ Experience of ‘Scale-Referenced’ Peer Assessment for a Consecutive Interpreting Examination.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (7): 1015–1029. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1223269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-B. 2017b. “Exploring a Relationship between Students’ Interpreting Self-Efficacy and Performance: Triangulating Data on Interpreter Performance Assessment.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, F.K., D.V. Lambdin, and R.V. Preston. 1997. “Assessment of Classroom Learning.” In Handbook of Classroom Assessment: Learning, Achievement, and Adjustment, edited by G.D. Phye, 287–320. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2 (4): 34–46. doi:10.1111/josi.1946.2.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M. 2011. “Methodology in Interpreting Studies: A Methodological Review of Evidence-Based Research.” In Advances in Interpreting Research: Inquiry in Action, edited by B. Nicodemus and L. Swabey, 85–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M. 2015. “Assessment.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited by F. Pöchhacker, 20–22. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, B. 2016. Peer Assessment that Works: A Guide for Teachers. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J. 1984. “Action Research: A Generative Model for In-Service Support.” British Journal of In-Service Education 10 (3): 40–46. doi:10.1080/0305763840100307.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J. 2013. Action Research: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2011. All You Need to Know about Action Research. 2nd ed ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. 2003. “The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (4): 383–394. doi:10.1080/0260293032000066218.
   Google Scholar
• Napier, J. 2005. “Making Learning Accessible for Sign Language Interpreters: A Process of Change.” Educational Action Research 13 (4): 505–524. doi:10.1080/09650790500200302.
   Google Scholar
• Nicodemus, B., and L. Swabey. 2016. “Action Research.” In Researching Translation and Interpreting, edited by C.V. Angelelli and B. James Baer, 157–167. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 2000. “The Use of Student-Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (1): 23–38. doi:10.1080/02602930050025006.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 2002. “The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback When Using Student-Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (4): 309–323. doi:10.1080/0260293022000001337.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, C. 2012. “‘Some Kind of Weird, Evil Experiment’: Student Perceptions of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (6): 719–731. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.563281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrzak, P. 2014. “Towards Effective Feedback to Translation Students: Empowering through Group Revision and Evaluation.” inTRAlinea, Special Issue: Challenges in Translation Pedagogy. Accessed 18 December 2017. http://www.intralinea.org/specials/article/towards_effective_feedback_to_translation_students.
   Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, F. 2010. “The Role of Research in Interpreter Education.” The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting Research 2 (1): 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Priestley, M. 1982. Performance Assessment in Education and Training: Alternative Techniques. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. 2016. “The Assessment Cycle: A Model for Learning through Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 301–315. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivan, A. 2000. “The Implementation of Peer Assessment: An Action Research Approach.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 7 (2): 193–213. doi:10.1080/713613328.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2009. “Summative Assessment: The Missing Link for Formative Assessment.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 33 (1): 57–69. doi:10.1080/03098770802638671.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 2009. “Peer Assessment.” Theory into Practice 48 (1): 20–27. doi:10.1080/00405840802577569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, I., W. Admiraal, and A. Pilot. 2006. “Peer Assessment in University Teaching: Evaluating Seven Course Designs.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (1): 19–36. doi:10.1080/02602930500262346.
   Google Scholar
• Varney, J. 2009. “From Hermeneutics to the Translation Classroom: A Social Constructivist Approach to Effective Learning.” The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting Research 1 (1): 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, M.L., and -C.-C. Tsai. 2006. “University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes toward (Online) Peer Assessment.” Higher Education 51: 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., and S. Song. 2012. “Development of a Wiki-Based Learning Model for Foreign Language Interpretation Courses.” Revista Iberoamericana 23 (3): 191–220.
   Google Scholar