Genuine Faculty-Mentored Research Experiences for In-Service Science Teachers: Increases in Science Knowledge, Perception, and Confidence Levels

References

• Agyei, D., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers, through teacher design teams. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 547–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Retrieved from http://visionandchange.org/files/2013/11/aaas-VISchange-web1113.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2015). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: Chronicling change, inspiring the future. Retrieved from http://visionandchange.org/files/2015/07/VISchange2015_webFin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1015171124982
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, W. A., Banerjee, U., Drennan, C. L., Elgrin, S. C. R., Epstein, I. R., Handelsman, J., … Warner, I. M. (2011, January 14). Changing the culture of science education at research universities. Science, 331(6014), 152–153. doi:10.1126/science.1198280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auchincloss, L. C., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., … Dolan, E. L. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: A meeting report. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13, 29–40. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-01-0004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, W., & Keller, J. (2010). Science teacher and researcher (STAR) program: Strengthening STEM education through authentic research experiences for preservice and early career teachers. American Association of American Colleges & Universities Peer Review, 12(2), 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, B. S., Nugent, G. G., & Grandgenett, N. F. (2013). Examining fidelity of program implementation in a STEM-oriented out-of-school setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265–278. doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9008-5
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher, R. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI-B: Measuring self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104(8), 383–391. doi:10.1111/ssm.2004.104.issue-8
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Melear, C. T. (2007). Preservice teachers’ research experiences in scientists’ laboratories. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 573–597. doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9044-9
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20–46). New York, NY: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Cox-Petersen, A. M. (2001). Empowering science teachers as researchers and inquirers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(2), 107–122. doi:10.1023/A:1016669405897
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, K. (2007). The role of teacher inquiry in helping prospective teachers untangle the complexities of technology use in classrooms. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Denofrio, L. A., Russell, B., Lopatto, D., & Lu, Y. (2007, December 21). Linking student interests to science curricula. Science,318(5858), 1872–1873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., & Bybee, R. (2014). Planning and carrying out investigations: An entry to learning and to teacher professional development around NGSS science and engineering practices. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–9. doi:10.1186/s40594-014-0012-6
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grable, L., Molyneaux, K., Dixon, P., & Holbert, K. (2011). STEM and TPACK in renewable energy for middle and high school: Building a learning community through teacher professional development. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2480–2485). Nashville, TN: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Grandgenett, N. F., Ostler, C., Topp, N., & Goeman, R. (2012). Robotics and problem-based learning in STEM formal educational environments. In B. Barker, G. Nugent, N. F. Grandgenett, & S. Adamchuk (Eds.), Robots in K-12 education: A new technology for learning (pp. 94–119). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Hoachlander, G., & Yanofsky, D. (2011). Making STEM real. Educational Leadership, 68(6), 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary MA Ed. program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83–106. doi:10.1080/15391523.2012.10782598
   Google Scholar
• Holoch, J. M., Grove, N., & Bretz, S. L. (2007). Preservice teacher as researcher: The value of inquiry in learning science. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(9), 1530–1534. doi:10.1021/ed084p1530
   Google Scholar
• Huziak-Clark, T., Van Hook, S. J., Nurnberger-Haag, J., & Ballone Duran, L. (2007). Using inquiry to improve pedagogy through K-12/university partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 107(8), 311–324. doi:10.1111/ssm.2007.107.issue-8
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6, 297–306. doi:10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Issues, implications, and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Melear, C. T., Goodlaxon, J. D., Warne, T. W., & Hickok, L. G. (2000). Teaching preservice science teachers how to do science: Responses to the research experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(1), 77–90. doi:10.1023/A:1009479915967
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120–123. doi:10.1097/00006199-199103000-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Promising practices for strengthening the regional STEM workforce development ecosystem. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000a). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000b). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core idea. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13165
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Neiss, M. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Welch, G. (2016). Robotics camps, clubs, and competitions: Results from a US robotics project. Robotics and Autonomous Systems Journal, 75, 686–691. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2015.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, M. (2008). Teacher candidates reflect together on their own development of TPCK: Edited teaching videos as data for inquiry. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 5305–5309). Las Vegas, NV: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 737–756. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1991). Science for all Americans (1st ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 235–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaben, C., Cutucache, C., Grandgenett, N., Mulkerrin, E., & Hougham, R. J. (2016). Supportive structures for successful science teachers’ professional development. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), International Conference of Education, Research, and Innovation (ICERI) Proceedings (pp. 4653–4662). International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (IATED).
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Passmore, C., & Reiser, B. (2017). Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, S., Dubner, J., Miller, J., Glied, S., & Loike, J. D. (2009, October 16). Teachers’ participation in research programs improves their students’ achievement in science. Science, 326, 440–442. doi:10.1126/science.1177344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapprich, W., Grandgenett, N., Leas, H., Rodie, S., Shuster, R., Schaben, C., & Cutucache, C. (2016). Enhancing the STEM ecosystem through teacher-researcher partnerships. Metropolitan Universities, 27(1), 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hook, S. J., Huziak-Clark, T. L., Nurnberger-Haag, J., & Ballone-Duran, L. (2009). Developing an understanding of inquiry by teachers and graduate student scientists through a collaborative professional development program. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 30–61.
   Google Scholar
• Varelas, M., House, R., & Wenzel, S. (2005). Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities. Science Education, 89(3), 492–516. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee, B., Shepardson, D., Fast, J., & Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 63–89. doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9031-6
   Google Scholar
• Woodin, T., Carter, V. C., & Fletcher, L. (2010). Vision and change in biology undergraduate education, a call for action—Initial responses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 9, 71–73. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-03-0044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodin, T., Feser, J., & Herrera, J. (2012). The vision is set, now help chronicle the change. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11, 347–350. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-09-0162
   Google Scholar