Publication Cover
PRIMUS
Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies
Volume 25, 2015 - Issue 9-10: Special Issue on the Flipped Classroom: Effectiveness as an Instructional Model
11,755
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Flipped Calculus: A Study of Student Performance and Perceptions

REFERENCES

  • Ash, K. 2012. Educators evaluate ‘flipped classrooms’: Benefits and drawbacks seen in replacing lectures with on-demand video. Education Week. 32(2): 6–8.
  • Attebery, E. 2013. ‘Flipped classrooms’ may not have any impact on learning. USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/22/flipped-classrooms-effectiveness/3148447/0. Accessed 9 July 2015.
  • Bates, S. and R. Galloway. 2012. The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: A case study. Paper presented at HEA STEM Conference, London, UK.
  • Berrett, D. 2012. How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 12: 1–14.
  • Crouch, C. and E. Mazur. 2001. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics. 69(9): 970–977.
  • Epstein, J. 2013. The calculus concept inventory measurement of the effect of teaching methodology in mathematics. Notices of the AMS. 60(8): 1018–1026.
  • Flath, D., T. Halverson, D. Kaplan, and K. Saxe. 2013. The first year of calculus and statistics at macalester College. Undergraduate Mathematics for the Life Sciences: Models, Processes, and Directions. 81: 39–43.
  • Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(23): 8410–8415.
  • Gannod, G., J. Burge, and M. Helmick. 2008. Using the inverted classroom to teach Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 777–786. New York: ACM.
  • Hake, R. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A Six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics. 66(1): 64–74.
  • Lage, M., G. Platt, and M. Treglia. 2000. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education. 31(1): 30–43.
  • Love, B., A. Hodge, N. Grandgenett, and A. Swift. 2013. Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Tehnology. 45(3): 317–324.
  • McGivney-Burell, J. and F. Xue. 2013. Flipping calculus. PRIMUS. 23(5): 477–486.
  • Moravec, M., A. Williams, N. Aguilar-Roca, and D. O’Dowd. 2010. Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education. 9(4): 473–481.
  • R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Strayer, J. 2012. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research. 15(2): 171–193.
  • Talbert, R. 2012. Learning MATLAB in the inverted classroom. Computers in Education Journal. 23(2): 50–60.
  • Talbert, R. 2014. Inverting the linear algebra classroom. PRIMUS. 24(5): 361–374.
  • Tucker, B. 2012. The flipped classroom. Education Next. 12: 82–83.