The Not-So-Simple View of Writing in Struggling Readers/Writers

References

• Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Y., Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., & Francis, D. J. (2021). Structure Altering Effects of a Multicomponent Reading Intervention: An Application of the Direct and Inferential Mediation (DIME) Model of Reading Comprehension in Upper Elementary Grades. Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219421995904
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Y., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). A “Simple” Illustration of a Joint Model of Reading and Writing Using Meta-analytic Structural Equation Modeling (MASEM). Reading-Writing Connections, 55–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_4
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, Sentence and Text Levels: A Latent Change Score Analysis. J Educ Psychol, 106(2), 419–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing: with commentaries by Ronald T. Kellogg & John R. Hayes (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeier, L. E. (2006). The contribution of executive function to reading and writing outcomes in typically developing readers and writers and in children and adults with dyslexia [Doctoral dissertation]. [Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database]. University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Altemeier, L. E., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2008). Executive functions for reading and writing in typical literacy development and dyslexia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(5), 588–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauvais, C., Olive, T., & Passerault, J. M. (2011). Why are some texts good and others not? Relationship between text quality and management of the writing processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W. (Ed.). (2012). Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805312
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. J Learn Disabil, (1)35, 39–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Garcia, N. P., & Abbott, R. D. (2009). Multiple processes that matter in writing instruction and assessment. In G. A. Troia (Ed.) Instruction and assessment for struggling writers. (pp.15–50). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Geselowitz, K., & Wallis, P. (2018). Multiple perspectives on the nature of writing: Typically developing writers in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7 and students with writing disabilities in grades 4 to 9. In C. Bazerman, A. N. Applebee, V. W. Berninger, D. Brandt, S. Graham, J. V. Jeffery, P. K. Matsuda, S. Murphy, D. W. Rowe, M. Schleppegrell, and K. C. Wilcox (Eds.) The lifespan development of writing. (pp. 151–180). National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Nielsen, K. H., Abbott, R. D., Wijsman, E., & Raskind, W. (2008). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Under-recognized and under-treated. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blachman, B. A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Murray, M. S., Munger, K. A., & Vaughn, M. G. (2014). Intensive reading remediation in grade 2 or 3: Are there effects a decade later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 2, 591–620.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach. Reading and Writing, 13(3/4), 183–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026458102685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindle, M., Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Hebert, M. (2015). Third and fourth grade teacher’s classroom practices in writing: a national survey. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 929–954. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9604-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretti, B., Motta, E., & Re, A. M. (2016). Oral and written expression in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414528539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Villarreal, F., & Ponce, C. (2017). Test review of the test of written language, fourth edition. In J. F. Carlson, K. F. Geisinger, & J. L. Jonson (Eds.), The twentieth mental measurements yearbook. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
   Google Scholar
• Childress, A. (2011). Understanding writing problems in young children: Contributions of cognitive skills to the development of written expression. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. [Doctoral dissertation]. [Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database].
   Google Scholar
• Cirino, P. T. (2012). The Contextual Learning Scale. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cirino, P. T., Ahmed, Y., Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., Gerst, E. H., & Barnes, M. A. (2018). A framework for executive function in the late elementary years. Neuropsychology, 32(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. J. (2006). The development and validation of the self-regulation strategy inventory—self-report. Journal of School Psychology, 44(4), 307–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, V., Dockrell, J. E., Walter, K., & Critten, S. (2012). Predicting the quality of composition and written language bursts from oral language, spelling, and handwriting skills in children with and without specific language impairment. Written Communication, 29(3), 278–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, L. J. C., Edwards, C. N., & Hooper, S. R. (2016). Writing disabilities and reading disabilities in elementary school students: Rates of co-occurrence and cognitive burden. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714565461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockrell, J. E., Connelly, V., & Arfè, B. (2019). Struggling writers in elementary school: Capturing drivers of performance. Learning and Instruction, 60, 75–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drijbooms, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). The contribution of executive functions to narrative writing in fourth grade children. Reading and Writing, 28(7), 989–1011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9558-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2019). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 553–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D. J., Kulesz, P. A., & Benoit, J. S. (2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: The complete view of reading (CVR i). Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 274–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518772904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., Van Der Heyden, A. M., Naquin, G. M., & Slider, N. J. (2002). Moving Beyond Total Words Written: The Reliability, Criterion Validity, and Time Cost of Alternate Measures for Curriculum-Based Measurement in Writing. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 477–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Madruga, J. A., Gómez-Veiga, I., & Vila, J. Ó. (2016). Executive Functions and the Improvement of Thinking Abilities: The Intervention in Reading Comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 58. 7 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 454–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosse, C., & Van Reybroeck, M. (2020). Do children with dyslexia present a handwriting deficit? Impact of word orthographic and graphic complexity on handwriting and spelling performance. Res Dev Disabil, 97, 103553 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2020). The sciences of reading and writing must become more fully integrated. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S35–S44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Aitken, A. A., Hebert, M., Camping, A., Santangelo, T., Harris, K. R., Eustice, K., Sweet, J. D., & Ng, C. (2020). Do children with reading difficulties experience writing difficulties? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000643
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Fan, W. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 516–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K., & Hebert, M. A. (2011). Informing writing: The benefits of formative assessment. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. https://l1.publication-archive.com/download/2/2099
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., MacArthur, C. A., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2013). Best practices in writing instruction. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8(1), 7–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01761831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorenko, E. L., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Wagner, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammill, D. D., & Larsen, S. C. (2009). Test of written language 4 (TOWL-4). Pro-Ed Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, J., Snowling, M. J., & Griffiths, Y. M. (2002). Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. The British ournal of ducational sychology, 72(Pt 1), 119–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158801
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R., & Berninger, V. (2014). Cognitive processes in writing: A framework. In: Arfê JB, Dockrell JE and Berninger V (eds) Writing Development in Children with Hearing Loss, Dyslexia or Oral Language Problems: Implications for Assessment and Instruction. (pp. 3–15). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199827282.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert, M., Kearns, D. M., Hayes, J. B., Bazis, P., & Cooper, S. (2018). Why children with dyslexia struggle with writing and how to help them. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 843–863. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, S. R., Swartz, C. W., Wakely, M. B., de Kruif, R. E., & Montgomery, J. W. (2002). Executive functions in elementary school children with and without problems in written expression. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, S. R., Wakely, M. B., De Kruif, R. E., & Swartz, C. W. (2006). Aptitude-treatment interactions revisited: Effect of metacognitive intervention on subtypes of written expression in elementary school students. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 217–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2901_11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston Independent School District. (2021). The Houston Independent School District Literacy Plan 2014 – 2016. Retrieved from https://www.houstonisd.org/
   Google Scholar
• Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–71). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
   Google Scholar
• Kent, S. C., & Wanzek, J. (2016). The Relationship Between Component Skills and Writing Quality and Production Across Developmental Levels. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 570–601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315619491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S G., & Park, S.-H. (2019). Unpacking pathways using the direct and indirect effects model of writing (DIEW) and the contributions of higher order cognitive skills to writing. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1319–1343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9913-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S. G., & Schatschneider, C. (2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. (2002). A question of calibration: A review of the self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1511276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoftas, A. D., & Gray, S. (2012). Comparison of Narrative and Expository Writing in Students With and Without Language-Learning Disabilities. Language, peech, and earing ervices in chools, 43(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0018)
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoftas, A. D., & Gray, S. (2013). A structural equation model of the writing process in typically-developing sixth grade children. Reading and Writing, 26(6), 941–966. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9399-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. H., Mungas, D., Possin, K. L., Rankin, K. P., Boxer, A. L., Rosen, H. J., Bostrom, A., Sinha, L., Berhel, A., & Widmeyer, M. (2014). NIH EXAMINER: conceptualization and development of an executive function battery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617713001094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhrt, B. L., & Farris, P. J. (1990). Empowering students through reading, writing, and reasoning. Journal of Reading, 33(6), 436–441.
   Google Scholar
• Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013a). Modeling writing development: Contribution of transcription and self-regulation to Portuguese students' text generation quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 401–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013b). Teaching planning or sentence-combining strategies: Effective SRSD interventions at different levels of written composition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 328–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2014). Implicit theories of writing and their impact on students' response to a SRSD intervention. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 571–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limpo, T., Alves, R. A., & Fidalgo, R. (2014). Children's high‐level writing skills: Development of planning and revising and their contribution to writing quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limpo, T., Alves, R. A., & Connelly, V. (2017). Examining the transcription-writing link: Effects of handwriting fluency and spelling accuracy on writing performance via planning and translating in middle grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 26–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S. (2016). Writing research from a cognitive perspective. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 24–40). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2007). Challenging the assumptions about the frequency and coexistence of learning disability types. School Psychology International, 28(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034307084134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S. H., & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 256–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hicks, L., Roeser, R., Urdan, T., Anderman, E., & Kaplan, A. (1996). The patterns of adaptive learning survey (PALS). University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B., & McCardle, P. (2011). Reflections on the need for continued research on writing. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9267-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide. 8th ed. Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (2011). 6 + 1 Trait writing. http://educationnorthwest/traits
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, L., Connelly, V., & Barnett, A. (2018). Understanding writing difficulties through a model of the cognitive processes involved in writing. In B. Miller, P. McCardle, & V. Connelly (Eds.), Writing development in struggling learners: Understanding the needs of writers across the lifecourse (pp. 11–28). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Olinghouse, N. G., & Graham, S. (2009). The relationship between the discourse knowledge and the writing performance of elementary-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, T. (2004). Working memory in writing: Empirical evidence from the dual-task technique. European Psychologist, 9(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.1.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). Concurrent activation of high- and low-level production processes in written composition. Memory & ognition, 30(4), 594–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page-Voth, V., & Graham, S. (1999). Effects of goal setting and strategy use on the writing performance and self-efficacy of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poch, A. L. (2016). An examination of the structural relationships of adolescent writing: implications of the simple view of writing [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri–Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Puranik, C. S., & AlOtaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1523–1546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranik, C. S., Wagner, R. K., Kim, Y.-S., & Lopez, D. (2012). Multivariate assessment of processes in elementary students' written translation. In M. Fayol, D. Alamargot, & V. W. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing: Advancing theory, knowledge, research methods, tools, and applications. (pp. 249–274). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203141434-18
   Google Scholar
• Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van den Bergh, H. (2006). Writing process theory. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research. (2nd ed., pp. 41–53). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. J., Capin, P., Roberts, G., Miciak, J., Quinn, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2018). Examining the Effects of Afterschool Reading Interventions for Upper Elementary Struggling Readers. Remedial and pecial ducation : RASE, 39(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517750818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas, N., & Silvente, S. (2019). The role of executive functions and transcription skills in writing: a cross-sectional study across 7 years of schooling. Reading and Writing, 33(4), 877–905. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09979-y
   Google Scholar
• Santangelo, T., Harris, H. R., & Graham, S. (2016). Self-regulation and writing. Meta-analysis of the self-regulation processes in Zimmerman and Risemberg’s model. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (eds.), Handbook of Writing Research., (2nd ed., pp. 174–193). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R., Van Gelderen, A., De Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Snellings, P., Simis, A., & Stevenson, M. (2002). Linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and retrieval speed. In S. Ransdell & M.-L. Barbier (Eds.), L1, L2 and EFL writing a structural equation modelling approach. In New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 101–122). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. E., Possin, K. L., Girard, J. M., & Rey-Casserly, C. (2014). Executive Function in Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: The NIH EXAMINER Battery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 20(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617713001100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, K. C., & Reynolds, C. R. (2006). School Motivation and Learning Strategies Inventory (SMALSI). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 22(2), 262–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573507306453
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, E., Connelly, V., & Barnett, A. L. (2014). The influence of spelling ability on handwriting production: Children with and without dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1441–1447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children's writing: A function of working memory or reading or both processes? Reading and Writing, 8(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency (2019). Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills For English Language Arts and Reading. Texas Administrative Code. Retrieved from https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/tacctx$.startup
   Google Scholar
• Titz, C., & Karbach, J. (2014). Working memory and executive functions: effects of training on academic achievement. Psychological esearch, 78(6), 852–868. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0537-1
   Google Scholar
• Tops, W., Callens, C., Van Cauwenberghe, E., Adriaens, J., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Beyond spelling: the writing skills of students with dyslexia in higher education. Reading and Writing, 26(5), 705–720. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9387-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R., & García, J. N. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth-grade writers. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia, G. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2017). Writing and Students with Language and Learning Disabilities. Handbook of Special Education, 537–557. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517698-42
   Google Scholar
• Troia, G. A., Brehmer, J. S., Glause, K., Reichmuth, H. L., & Lawrence, F. (2020). Direct and Indirect Effects of Literacy Skills and Writing Fluency on Writing Quality Across Three Genres. Education Sciences, 10(11), 297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2012). The simple view of reading redux: Vocabulary knowledge and the independent components hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 453–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411432685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Herrera, S. K., Spencer, M., & Quinn, J. M. (2015). Reconsidering the simple view of reading in an intriguing case of equivalent models: Commentary on Tunmer and Chapman (2012). Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(2), 115–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414544544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. (2010). Test of sentence reading efficiency and comprehension. Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, D., Berninger, V., Johnston, J., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Intraindividual differences in levels of language in intermediate grade writers: Implications for the translating process. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement. (3rd ed.). Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar