1,761
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Feature Article

Building upon the foundational science curriculum with physiology-based grand rounds: a multi-institutional program evaluation

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Article: 1937908 | Received 03 Mar 2021, Accepted 30 May 2021, Published online: 11 Jun 2021

References

  • Malau-Aduli BS, Roche P, Adu M, et al.. Perceptions and processes influencing the transition of medical students from pre-clinical to clinical training. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):279.
  • Raty SR, Teal CR, Nelson EA, et al.. Near-peers improve patient safety training in the preclinical curriculum. Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1289315.
  • Richards J, Schwartzstein R, Irish J, et al.. Clinical physiology grand rounds. Clin Teach. 2013;10(2):88–6.
  • González HL, Palencia AP, Umaña LA, et al.. Mediated learning experience and concept maps: a pedagogical tool for achieving meaningful learning in medical physiology students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2008;32(4):312–316.
  • Hayes MM, Chatterjee S, Schwartzstein RM. Critical thinking in critical care: five strategies to improve teaching and learning in the intensive care unit. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(4):569–575.
  • Estes TH, Mintz SL. Instruction : a models approach. 7th. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc; 2016. p. xviii, 313.
  • Richards JB, Hayes MM, Schwartzstein RM. Teaching clinical reasoning and critical thinking: from cognitive theory to practical application. Chest. 2020;158(4):1617–1628.
  • Hall S, Harrison CH, Stephens J, et al.. The benefits of being a near-peer teacher. Clin Teach. 2018;15(5):403–407. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12784.
  • Lin JA, Farrow N, Lindeman BM, et al.. Impact of near-peer teaching rounds on student satisfaction in the basic surgical clerkship. Am J Surg. 2017;213(6):1163–1165.
  • Gottlieb Z, Epstein S, Richards J. Near-peer teaching programme for medical students. Clin Teach. 2017;14(3):164–169.
  • Woods R, Ramasubbu B, Donohoe C, et al.. Near-peer bedside clinical teaching: example of a successful programme. Clin Teach. 2014;11(6):472–477.
  • Lydon S, O’Connor P, Mongan O, et al.. A mixed method, multiperspective evaluation of a near peer teaching programme. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93(1103):541–548. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134464.
  • Liew SC, Sow CF, Sidhu J, et al.. The near-peer tutoring programme: embracing the ‘doctors-to-teach’ philosophy--a comparison of the effects of participation between the senior and junior near-peer tutors. Med Educ Online. 2015;20(1):27959.
  • Ince-Cushman D, Rudkin T, Rosenberg E. Supervised near-peer clinical teaching in the ambulatory clinic: an exploratory study of family medicine residents’ perspectives. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(1):8–13.
  • Nelson AJ, Nelson SV, Linn AM, et al.. Tomorrow’s educators … today? Implementing near-peer teaching for medical students. Med Teach. 2013;35(2):156–159.
  • Bulte C, Betts A, Garner K, et al.. Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):583–590.
  • Whitman N. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education. Peer teaching : to teach is to learn twice. College Station (TX): Association for the Study of Higher Eduction; 1988. p. xvii, 88.
  • Evans DJ, Cuffe T. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(5):227–233.
  • Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, et al.. Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011;2:157–172.
  • Meller SM, Chen M, Chen R, et al.. Near-peer teaching in a required third-year clerkship. Yale J Biol Med. 2013;86(4):583–589.
  • Hall S, Stephens J, Andrade T, et al.. Perceptions of junior doctors and undergraduate medical students as anatomy teachers: investigating distance along the near-peer teaching spectrum. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(3):242–247.
  • Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. San Francisco (CA): Berret-Koehler; 1994.