The Role of Home Literacy Environment, Mentalizing, Expressive Verbal Ability, and Print Exposure in Third and Fourth Graders’ Reading Comprehension

References

• Adrian, J. E., Clemente, R. A., & Villanueva, L. (2007). Mothers’ use of cognitive state verbs in picture-book reading and the development of children’s understanding of mind: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 78(4), 1052–1067. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01052.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adrian, J. E., Clemente, R. A., Villanueva, L., & Rieffe, C. (2005). Parent-child picture-book reading, mothers’ mental state language and children’s theory of mind. Journal of Child Language, 32(3), 673–686. doi:10.1017/S0305000905006963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L., Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Multiple indicators of children’s reading habits and attitudes: Construct validity and cognitive correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 489–503. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1995). Theory of mind development and social understanding. Cognition & Emotion, 9(2–3), 151–165. doi:10.1080/02699939508409006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311–1320. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. L., & Bloom, P. (2014). Children’s preference for social stories. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 498–503. doi:10.1037/a0033613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, N. (1991). Gestalt imagery: A critical factor in language comprehension. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 246–260. doi:10.1007/Bf02648089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in Grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635–651. doi:10.1037/a0019319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt, N., Drenth, P. J. D., Zaal, J. N., & Resing, W. C. M. (1984). Revisie Amsterdamse Kinder Intelligentie Test [Revised Amsterdam Child Intelligence Test]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets.
   Google Scholar
• Boerma, Mol, & Jolles. (2016). Reading pictures for story comprehension requires mental imagery skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1630. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01630
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R. H., Corwyn, R. F., Burchinal, M., McAdoo, H. P., & Garcia Coll, C. (2001). The home environments of children in the United States part II: Relations with behavioral development through age thirteen. Child Development, 72(6), 1868–1886. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, S. R., Hecht, S. A., & Lonigan, C. J. (2002). Relations of the home literacy environment (HLE) to the development of reading-related abilities: A one-year longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(4), 408–426. doi:10.1598/rrq.37.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bus, A. G., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 1–21. doi:10.3102/00346543065001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs & reading groups. Markham, Canada: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Davidse, N. J., De Jong, M. T., Bus, A. G., Huijbregts, S. C. J., & Swaab, H. (2011). Cognitive and environmental predictors of early literacy skills. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 395–412. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9233-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, P. F., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2001). Lasting effects of home literacy on reading achievement in school. Journal of School Psychology, 39(5), 389–414. doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(01)00080-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning, B. B., & Van Der Schoot, M. (2013). Becoming part of the story! Refueling the interest in visualization strategies for reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 25(2), 261–287. doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9222-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and Theory of Mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858–1878. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dek, J. E., & Kooij, A. P. (2012). De RAKIT-2. Veranderingen ten opzichte van de oorspronkelijke RAKIT [The RAKIT-2. Changes compared to the original RAKIT]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Pearson. Retrieved from https://www.pearsonclinical.nl/media/whitepapers/Whitepaper_RAKIT-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2013). Silent films and strange stories: Theory of mind, gender, and social experiences in middle childhood. Child Development, 84(3), 989–1003. doi:10.1111/Cdev.12017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C. (2013). Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28–47. doi:10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji
   Google Scholar
• Dodell-Feder, D., Lincoln, S. H., Coulson, J. P., & Hooker, C. I. (2013). Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: A new task for assessing theory of mind in adults. Plos One, 8(11), e81279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensor, R., Devine, R. T., Marks, A., & Hughes, C. (2014). Mothers’ cognitive references to 2-year-olds predict theory of mind at ages 6 and 10. Child Development, 85(3), 1222–1235. doi:10.1111/Cdev.12186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Sikora, J. (2014). Scholarly culture and academic performance in 42 nations. Social Forces, 92(4), 1573–1605. doi:10.1093/sf/sou030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, P. C., Happé, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1995). Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of theory of mind in story comprehension. Cognition, 57(2), 109–128. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (2006). The mentalization-focused approach to social development. In J. G. Allen & P. Fonagy (Eds.), Handbook of mentalization-based treatment (pp. 53–99). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. A., & Milosky, L. M. (2008). Inference generation during discourse and its relation to social competence: An online investigation of abilities of children with and without language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 367–380. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/027)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 459–473. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, U., Morton, J., & Leslie, A. M. (1991). The cognitive basis of a biological disorder: Autism. Trends in Neurosciences, 14(10), 433–438. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(91)90041-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 129–151. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(92)90008-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Doan Holbein, M. F. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 99–123. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3949-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutkind, L. (2012). You can’t make this stuff up. The complete guide to writing creative nonfiction—From memoir to literary journalism and everything in between. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2005). PIRLS 2006 Learning to read survey. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y.-S. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 261–276. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9112-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 765–778. doi:10.1037/a0015956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi:10.1126/science.1239918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. (2015). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: Evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86(1), 128–144. doi:10.1111/cdev.12293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G., Park, C., & Park, Y. (2015). Dimensions of discourse level oral language skills and their relation to reading comprehension and written composition: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 633–654. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9542-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• La Roi, T. (2010). Mijn leukste, spannendste, coolste, vetste… boek! Verslag van een kwantitatief onderzoek naar leesvoorkeuren van leerlingen en leerkrachten in het basisonderwijs [My favorite, most exciting, coolest, best… book! Report of a quantitative study on primary school students’ and teachers’ reading preferences]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Stichting Lezen.
   Google Scholar
• Lecce, S., Bianco, F., Devine, R. T., Hughes, C., & Banerjee, R. (2014). Promoting theory of mind during middle childhood: A training program. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 52–67. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecce, S., Zocchi, S., Pagnin, A., Palladino, P., & Taumoepeau, M. (2010). Reading minds: The relation between children’s mental state knowledge and their metaknowledge about reading. Child Development, 81(6), 1876–1893. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01516.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leseman, P. P. M., & De Jong, P. F. (1998). Home literacy: Opportunity, instruction, cooperation and social-emotional quality predicting early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(3), 294–318. doi:10.1598/rrq.33.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddle, B., & Nettle, D. (2006). Higher-order theory of mind and social competence in school-age children. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4(3–4), 231–246. doi:10.1556/JCEP.4.2006.3–4.3
   Google Scholar
• Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428. doi:10.1515/Comm.2009.025
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2009). The role of the theory-of-mind cortical network in the comprehension of narratives. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 157–174. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00122.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78(2), 622–646. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. doi:10.1037/A0021890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., De Jong, M. T., & Smeets, D. J. H. (2008). Added value of dialogic parent–child book readings: A meta-analysis. Early Education and Development, 19(1), 7–26. doi:10.1080/10409280701838603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury, C. F., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2002). Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: A comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high-functioning autism. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37(3), 227–251. doi:10.1080/13682820210136269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury, C., & Nation, K. (2011). Understanding variability in reading comprehension in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Interactions with language status and decoding skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(3), 191–210. doi:10.1080/10888431003623553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, T. G., & Hirsch, N. (1999). Intra-individual differences and relationship-specificity of mentalising in early adolescence. Social Development, 8(2), 256–274. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. (2008). Home literacy environments and children’s reading performance: A comparative study of 25 countries. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 14(6), 489–505. doi:10.1080/13803610802576734
   Google Scholar
• Rain, M., & Mar, R. A. (2014). Measuring reading behavior: Examining the predictive validity of print-exposure checklists. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32(1), 93–108. doi:10.2190/EM.32.1f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts, J., Jones, C. R. G., Happé, F., & Charman, T. (2013). Reading comprehension in autism spectrum disorders: The role of oral language and social functioning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(4), 807–816. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1619-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffman, T. (2014). To belief or not belief: Children’s theory of mind. Developmental Review, 34(3), 265–293. doi:10.1016/J.Dr.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, R. L., & Grizzle, K. L. (2008). Assessing child and adolescent pragmatic language competencies: Toward evidence-based assessments. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(1–2), 59–73. doi:10.1007/s10567-008-0032-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S., & Dobrich, W. (1994). On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers. Developmental Review, 14(3), 245–302. doi:10.1006/drev.1994.1010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452–477. doi:10.1598/rrq.34.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2002). Commentary: Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 101–120. doi:10.1023/A:1013136727916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénéchal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to Grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(1), 59–87. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1001_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A 5-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–460. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénéchal, M., LeFevre, J. A., Hudson, E., & Lawson, E. P. (1996). Knowledge of storybooks as a predictor of young children’s vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 520–536. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénéchal, M., LeFevre, J., Thomas, E., & Daley, K. (1998). Differential effects of home literacy experiences on the development of oral and written language. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 96–116. doi:10.1598/rrq.33.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénéchal, M., Ouellette, G., & Rodney, D. (2006). The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 173–182). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (1991). The theoretical basis for relationships between language and literacy in development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 6(1), 5–10. doi:10.1080/02568549109594817
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (1999). Facilitating language development promotes literacy learning. In L. Eldering & P. P. M. Leseman (Eds.), Effective early education. Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 141–161). New York, NY: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Office of Education Research and Improvement, Science and Technology Policy Institute, RAND Reading Study Group, RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465.html
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. doi:10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. doi:10.2307/747605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiller, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007). Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Social Networks, 29(1), 93–104. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2006.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, K., & Del Rio, F. (2014). The role of comprehension monitoring, theory of mind, and vocabulary depth in predicting story comprehension and recall of kindergarten children. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2), 169–187. doi:10.1002/Rrq.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strommen, L. T., & Mates, B. F. (2004). Learning to love reading: Interviews with older children and teens. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(3), 188–200. doi:10.1598/jaal.48.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, D. K., Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V., Roche, J., & Doyle, E. (2005). Theory of mind and mental state discourse during book reading and story-telling tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 81–102. doi:10.1348/026151004x21080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Nijenhuis, J., Tolboom, E., Resing, W., & Bleichrodt, N. (2004). Does cultural background influence the intellectual performance of children from immigrant groups? The RAKIT intelligence test for immigrant children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 10–26. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.20.1.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichnor-Wagner, A., Garwood, J. D., Bratsch-Hines, M., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2015). Home literacy environments and foundational literacy skills for struggling and nonstruggling readers in rural early elementary schools. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 6–21. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Steensel, R. (2006). Relations between socio-cultural factors, the home literacy environment and children’s literacy development in the first years of primary education. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 367–382. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekers, A., Groenen, I., Kleintjes, F., & Feenstra, H. (2011). Wetenschappelijke verantwoording papieren toetsen begrijpend lezen voor groep 7 en 8 [Scientific background of paper-based reading comprehension tests for Grade 5 and 6]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito. Retrieved from http://toetswijzer.kennisnet.nl/html/tg/21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., & Mitchell, H. R. (1993). Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 35–50. doi:10.2307/747815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Hill, E., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2009). Revisiting the strange stories: Revealing mentalizing impairments in autism. Child Development, 80(4), 1097–1117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01319.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., & Varley, R. (2010). Neural insights into the relation between language and communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Singer, M. (2003). Text comprehension. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldmann (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 83–121). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar