Investigating changes in high-stakes mathematics examinations: a discursive approach

References

• Alshwaikh, J. (2011). Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication: A functional analytic framework (PhD thesis). Institute of Education, University of London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, P., & Sayers, J. (2005). How do teachers of mathematics teach? A four-way international comparison. Research in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 139–158. doi:10.1080/14794800008520150
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., Clarke, D., & Stephens, M. (2000). Assessment: The engine of systemic curricular reform? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(5), 623–650. doi: 10.1080/00220270050116923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. doi:10.1177/0741088307313177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, E. D., & Raizen, S. A. (Eds.). (1996). Examining the examinations: An international comparison of science and mathematics examinations for college bound students. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Broadfoot, P. M. (1996). Education, assessment and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, L., & Morgan, C. (2000). Mathematicians writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 429–453. doi: 10.2307/749652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider's perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2014). Higher standards as thousands more take GCSEs at the right time. Press release. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/higher-standards-as-thousands-more-take-gcses-at-the-right-time
   Google Scholar
• DES. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools under the chairmanship of Dr W. H. Cockcroft. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/ pedagogic texts. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher-Hoch, H., Hughes, S., & Bramley, T. (1997). What makes GCSE examination questions difficult? Outcomes of manipulating difficulty of GCSE questions. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, York. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/ca/collection1/digitalAssets/113957_What_Makes_GCSE_Examination_Questions_Difficult.Outcomes_of_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590. doi: 10.1080/0141192022000005832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourse of science (pp. 186–235). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). On language and linguistics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Mathiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language--based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2007). A framework for uncovering the way a textbook may position the mathematics learner. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgen, J., Marks, R., & Pepper, D. (2013). Towards universal participation in post-16 mathematics: Lessons from high-performing countries. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J. (2014). From clay tablet to computer tablet: The evolution of school mathematics textbooks. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fab (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics Textbooks Research and Development (ICMT) (pp. 3–12). Southampton: Southampton Education School, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J. (2015). History of research in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 267–272). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1993). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McSmith, A. (2007). Reading and maths standards falling in Britain says OECD. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/reading-and-maths-standards-falling-in-britain-says-oecd-762805.html
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1/2), 219–245. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-5477-x
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2009). Questioning the mathematics curriculum: A discursive approach. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 97–106). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2014a). Beyond communication: Using language for researching curriculum, pedagogy and policy in mathematics education. Annals of the Polish Mathematical Society 5th Series: Didactica Mathematicae, 36, 33–56. doi:10.14708/dm.v36i0.690
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2014b). Understanding practices in mathematics education: Structure and text. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 129–143. doi:10.1007/s10649-013-9482-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., Tang, S., & Sfard, A. (2012). Doing the same mathematics? Exploring changes over time in students’ participation in mathematical discourse through responses to GCSE questions. Informal Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 32(3), 138–143. Retrieved from: http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/IPs/ip32-3/BSRLM-IP-32-3-24.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nachlieli, T., & Tabach, M. (Eds.). (2016). Communicational perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics. Special issue of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3).
   Google Scholar
• Newton, J. A. (2012). Investigating the mathematical equivalence of written and enacted middle school Standards-based curricula: Focus on rational numbers. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 66–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.01.001
   Google Scholar
• O'Halloran, K. L. (2004). Discourses in secondary school mathematics classrooms according to social class and gender. In J. A. Foley (Ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches (pp. 191–225). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• O'Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2016). Communicational approach to study textbook discourse on the derivative. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 395–421. doi: 10.1007/s10649-015-9655-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paton, G. (2014). Drop in headline GCSE results ‘reflects toughening up of standards’, says minister. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/11180601/Drop-in-headline-GCSE-results-reflects-toughening-up-of-standards-says-minister.html
   Google Scholar
• Peled-Elhanan, N. (2015). Palestine in Israeli school textbooks: Ideology and propaganda in education. London: Tauris Academic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, A., Hughes, S., Ahmed, A., Fisher-Hoch, H., & Bramley, T. (1998). The effects of structure on the demands in GCSE and a level questions. Cambridge: OCR.
   Google Scholar
• Pons, X. (2012). Going beyond the ‘PISA Shock’ discourse: An analysis of the cognitive reception of PISA in six European countries, 2001–2008. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 206–226. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.206
   Google Scholar
• QCA. (2006). Review of standards in mathematics: GCSE 1999–2004 and A level 1998–2004. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rap, S., & Blonder, R. (2016). Let’s face(book) it: Analyzing interactions in social network groups for chemistry learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 62–76. doi: 10.1007/s10956-015-9577-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reform. (2005). Standards of public examinations in England and Wales. Retrieved from http://www.reform.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/standards_of_public_examinations_england_wales.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCAA. (1996). Standards in public examinations 1975 to 1995. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36. doi: 10.1007/BF00302715
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (Ed.). (2012). Developing mathematical discourse: Some insights from communicational research. Special issue of The International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 51–52.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2013). Not just so stories: Practicing discursive research for the benefit of educational practice. In V. Farnsworth & Y. Solomon (Eds.), What works in education? Bridging theory and practice in research (pp. 139–150). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & Lavie, I. (2005). Why cannot children see as the same what grown-ups cannot see as different? - Early numerical thinking revisited. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 237–309. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2302_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Morgan, C. (2016). Curricular orientations to real-world contexts in mathematics. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27. doi:10.1080/09585176.2016.1139498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar