Young students’ meaning-making when working with mathematics textbooks – A multimodal study focusing on the designed and the discovered

References

• Alshwaikh, J. (2011). Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication: A functional analytic framework. Diss. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Amiripour, P., Dossey, J. A., & Shahvarani, A. (2017). Using a new schema approach with primary at-risk students in word problem solving. REDIMAT, 6(3), 228–255. doi:10.1783/redimat.2017.2612
   Google Scholar
• Berger, M. (2017). Reading mathematics text: A study of two empirical readings. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(2), 385–404. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9867-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. R. (2010). Changing text: A social semiotic analysis of textbooks. Designs for Learning, 3(1–2), 10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2016). Reading multimodal texts for learning – A model for cultivating multimodal literacy. Multimodal literacy. Designs for Learning, 8(1), 25–36. doi:10.16993/dfl.72
   Google Scholar
• Dyrvold, A. (2016). The role of semiotic resources when reading and solving mathematics tasks. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1984). The role of the reader. Explorations in the semiotics of text. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633–646. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
   Google Scholar
• Fuson, K. C. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In I. D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 243–275). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haapaniemi, S., Mörsky, S., Tikkanen, A., Vehmas, P., & Voima, J. (2013). Mera favoritmatematik. 1A. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590. doi:10.1080/0141192022000005832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2016). What next for multimodality? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2. Ed.) (pp. 450–455). Abingdon, Australia: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2016). What is mode? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2. Ed.) (pp. 60–75). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2001). The place the pupil writing in learning, teaching and assessing mathematics. In I. P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 232–244). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 219–245. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-5477-x
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg, M. (2019). Potential for meaning making in mathematics textbooks. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 52–62. doi:10.16993/dfl.123
   Google Scholar
• Norberg, M. (2021). Exercise design in mathematics textbooks: The case of subtraction. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Österholm, M. (2008). Do students need to learn how to use their mathematics textbooks? The case of reading comprehension. NOMAD -Nordisk Matematikkdidaktikk, 13(3), 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Österholm, M., & Bergqvist, E. (2013). What is so special about mathematical texts? Analyses of common claims in research literature and of properties of textbooks. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 751–763. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0522-6
   Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., Driver, M. K., Roberts, G., & Fall, A.-M. (2017). An analysis of the mathematics vocabulary knowledge of third- and fifth grade students: Connections to general vocabulary and mathematics computation. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 22–32. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. doi:10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezat, S. (2008). Learning mathematics with textbooks. In O. Figueras, L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepulveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd conference of the International group for the psychology of mathematics Education and PME-NA XXX (Vol. 4) (pp. 177–184). Morelia: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Rezat, S., & Straesser, R. (2014). Mathematics textbooks and how they are used. In P. Andrews, & T. Rowland (Eds.), Masterclass in mathematics education: International perspectives on teaching and learning (pp. 51–62). London & New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Ristola, K., Tapaninaho, T., & Tirronen, L. (2012a). Favorit matematik. 1A. [Favorite Mathematics. 1A]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Ristola, K., Tapaninaho, T., & Tirronen, L. (2012b). Favorit matematik. 1B. [Favorite Mathematics. 1B]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Segerby, C. (2017). Supporting mathematical reasoning through reading and writing in mathematics: making the implicit explicit. Diss. Malmö: Malmö högskola. doi:Https://bsrlm.org.uk/BCME8/BCME8-Full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Selander, S., & Kress, G. R. (2010). Design för lärande: Ett multimodalt perspektiv. [Design for learning: A multimodal perspective]. Stockholm: Norstedt.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M., Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2012). University students’ reading of their first-year mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(3), 226–256. doi:10.1080/10986065.2012.682959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway, J. F., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Baker, J. M., Westenskow, A., Anderson-Pence, K. L., Tucker, S. I., … Jordan, K. E. (2016). Using open-response fraction items to explore the relationship between instructional modalities and students’ solution strategies. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(2), 112–132. doi:10.18404/ijemst.20845
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). God forskningssed. [God research practice]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar