Imagining possibilities: innovating mathematics (teacher) education for sustainable futures

References

• Abtahi, Y. (2020). The “M” in STEM as a note of caution: Resilient to what and responsive to whose culture. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(2), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00093-8
   Google Scholar
• Abtahi, Y., Gøtze, P., Steffensen, L., Barwell, R., & Hauge, K. H. (2017). Teaching climate change in mathematics classrooms: An ethical responsibility. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32, 1–18. http://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/education/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome32/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, A., Brown, J., Coles, A., Le Roux, K., Mellone, M., Ng, O., & Solares, A. (2021, July). Researching mathematics curriculum innovation in complex, changing, uncertain times. In M. Inprasitha, N. Changsri, & N. Boonsena (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 93–95).
   Google Scholar
• Altricher, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978979
   Google Scholar
• Barwell, R. (2013). The mathematical formatting of climate change: Critical mathematics education and post-normal science. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.756633
   Google Scholar
• Boylan, M., & Coles, A. (2017). Is another mathematics education possible? An introduction to a special issue on mathematics education and the living world. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32, 1–17. http://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/education/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome32/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, W. (2017). Work that reconnects: The seventh generation. https://workthatreconnects.org/resource/the-seventh-generation/
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Brown, L., Coles, A., & Helliwell, T. (2019). Learning to teach mathematics: The lesson de-brief conversation. In S. Llinares, & O. Chapman (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 85–108). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004418967_004
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Brown, L., Coles, A., & Helliwell, T. (2021). Working with awareness as mathematics teacher educators: Experiences to issues to actions. In M. Goos & K. Beswick (Eds.), The learning and development of mathematics teacher educators: International perspectives and challenges (pp. 187–204). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62408-8_10
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L., Helliwell, T., & Coles, A. (2018). Working as mathematics teacher educators at the meta-level (to the focus of the teachers on developing their teaching). Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 13, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i13
   Google Scholar
• Brownlee, M., Powell, R., & Jeffery, H. (2013). A review of the foundational processes that influence beliefs in climate change: Opportunities for environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.683389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2015). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, E., & Goedhart, M. (2012). Development and validation of the ACSI: Measuring students’ science attitudes, pro-environmental behaviour, climate change attitudes and knowledge. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.662213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Open University Press. https://another-roadmap.net/articles/0002/0968/elliott-action-research-for-educational-change-1991.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glanfield, F., Thom, J. S., & Ghostkeeper, E. (2020). Living landscapes, archi-text-ures, and land-guaging algo-rhythms. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(2), 246–263.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Observatory. (2019). Climate change in Hong Kong. https://www.hko.gov.hk/en/climate_change/climate_change.htm
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, C. (2018). Teacher education and posthumanism. Issues in Teacher Education, 27(1), 106–118. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1174909.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014 synthesis report. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner: Action research and the critical analysis of pedagogy. Hyperion books.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, J., & Stevens, D. (2008). Action research in teacher education: Two teacher-educators practice action research as they introduce action research to preservice teachers. Action Research, 6(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750307083716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. (2017). Where there is no vision, the people perish: A utopian ethic for a transformed future. CUSP essay series on the Ethics of Sustainable Prosperity, 5. http://www.cusp.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/05-Ruth-Levitas-Essay-online.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D., & Spicer, A. (2013). Contested imaginaries and the cultural political economy of climate change. Organization, 20(5), 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413489816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljedahl, P. (2016). Building thinking classrooms: Conditions for problem-solving. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 361–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_21
   Google Scholar
• Liljedahl, P. (2019). Institutional norms: The assumed, the actual, and the possible. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 1–16). http://www.igpme.org/publications/current-proceedings/
   Google Scholar
• Manfra, M. M. (2019). Action research and systematic, intentional change in teaching practice. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 163–196. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203471876
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Island Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248083
   Google Scholar
• Raven, P., & Stripple, J. (2021). Touring the carbon ruins: Towards an ethics of speculative decarbonisation. Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs, 11(1-2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1332/204378920X16052078001915
   Google Scholar
• Renert, M. (2011). Mathematics for life: Sustainable mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(1), 20–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41319547
   Google Scholar
• Rousell, D., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Foster, J. (2017). Children of an earth to come: Speculative fiction, geophilosophy and climate change education research. Educational Studies, 53(6), 654–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royea, D., & Nicol, C. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ experiences of learning study: Learning with and using variation theory. Educational Action Research, 27(4), 564–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1515094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savard, A. (2017). Implementing inquiry-based learning situation in science and technology: What are elementary school teachers’ learning intentions about mathematics? Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32, 1–15. http://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/education/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome32/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Skoll, J., Berge, R., Weyermann, D., Cohen, B., Shenk, J., Gore, A., Beal, J., Nusbaum, C., Bernier, D., Participant Media, Actual Films, Paramount Pictures Corporation. (2017). An inconvenient sequel: Truth to power.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3556-8
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O. (2011). Critique, generativity and imagination. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(3), 19–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41319603
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O. (2015). Uncertainty, pedagogical imagination, explorative reasoning, social justice, and critique. In Proceedings of the eighth international mathematics education and society conference (Vol. 8, pp. 111–122). https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer = https://scholar.google.co.uk/&httpsredir = 1&article = 1012&context = mse_facpub#page = 113
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O. (2016). Critical mathematics education: Concerns, notions, and future. In P. Ernest, O. Skovsmose, J. P. Van Bendegem, M. Bicudo, R. Miarka, L. Kvasz, & R. Moeller (Eds.), The Philosophy of mathematics education. ICME-13 topical surveys. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O. (2021). A philosophy of critical mathematics education. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 37, 1–24. http://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/education/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome37/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O., & Borba, M. (2004). Research methodology and critical mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education (pp. 207–226). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7914-1_17
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, P. (2019). Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomin, B. (2021). Speculative pedagogies: Envisioning change in teacher education. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 16(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00060_1
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to transform our world. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2019). Only 11 years left to prevent irreversible damage from climate change. https://www.un.org/press/en/2019/ga12131.doc.htm
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2016). Complex systems and multiple crises of energy. In S. Crate & M. Nuttall (Eds.), Anthropology and climate change (pp. 105–120). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315530338
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action research: Living theory. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208536
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. (2021). Transforming mathematics classroom practice through participatory action research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09452-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaro, K., Amoah, E., & Wagner, D. (2020). Situated perspectives on creating mathematics tasks for peace and sustainability. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00083-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar