Conceptualizing STEM teacher professional knowledge for teaching ELs: Initial impact of subject matter and disciplinary literacy PD on content knowledge and practice

References

• Abell, S. (2007). Handbook of research on science education. S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.). Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Achugar, M., Schleppegrell, M., & Oteiza, T. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistics approach to reflective literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique,6(2), 8–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z. (2014, August). Focus on meaning structures matters for English learners: Exploring opportunity to learn academic language. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Sciences, 2(6), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., & Amabisca, A. A. (2010). Defining opportunity to learn for English language learners: Linguistic and cultural dimensions of ELLs’ instructional contexts. Journal for the Education of Students Placed at Risk, 15(3), 259–278.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z. & Boscardin, C. K. (2008). Opportunity to learn and English learner achievement: Is increased content exposure beneficial? Journal of Latinos and Education, 7(3), 186–205.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Chang, R., & Sanders, J. (2015). Functional grammar instruction impact on writing. Educational Policies and Current Practices, 1(2), 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., & Gregory, M. O. (2019). Concept-based teaching in dual language science classrooms: Using oral language routines to develop scientific descriptions and arguments. In P. Spycher, & E. Haynes (Eds.), Culturally and linguistically diverse learners and STEAM: Teachers and researchers working in partnership to build a better path forward (pp. 45–75). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., & Pando, M. (2017). Knowing and teaching elementary math to bilingual students: Examining the role of teaching self efficacy on content knowledge. Journal of Bilingual Education Research and Instruction, 19(1), 126–145.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Pando, M., & Moreno, R. (2017, April). Assessing bilingual/ESL instructional quality to teach math and science to English learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA), San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Park, J. E., Amabisca, A. A., & Boscardin, C. K. (2008). Developing teacher capacity for serving ELLs’ writing instructional needs: A case for systemic functional linguistics. Bilingual Research Journal, 31, 295–322.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Yeter, I., Loria, E., & Koca, F. (2021). Building teachers’ capacity to integrate math and science content: Implications for professional development and learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(1), 62–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1789814
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 393–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020878121184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwell, R. (2016). Formal and informal mathematical discourses: Bakhtin and Vygotsky, dialogue and dialectic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(3), 331–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9641-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwell, R. (2018). From language as a resource to sources of meaning in multilingual mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50, 155–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscardin, C. K., Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Stoker, G., Kim, J., & Kim, M. (2005). Relationship between opportunity to learn and student performance on English and Algebra assessments. Educational Assessment Journal, 10(4), 147–172.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1990). Domain specific principles affect learning and transfer in children. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 107–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1401_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12461772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. (2014). The language of ideas and the language of display: Conceptualizing “academic language in linguistically diverse classrooms. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8(1), 70–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2014.852431
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1994). Mapping the mind. H. Wellman & S. Gelman (Eds.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Epson, S. B. (2015). Children’s mathematic: Cognitively guided instruction (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic & algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cervone, L. (2010). Excellence for Connecticut’s English language learners: A national professional development grant project. AccELLerate!: The Quarterly Newsletter of the National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition, 2(2), 20–21. Retrieved from: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/accellerate/
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, O. L. (2000). Learning science involves language, experience, and modeling. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 97–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00053-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, M. R., Hamann, E. T., Harrington, M., Pacheco, M., Pho, S., & Yedlin, J. (2007). Inclusive pedagogy for English language learners: A handbook for research-informed practices. In L. S. Verplaestse & N. Migliacii (Eds.), Successful schooling for ELLs: Principles four building responsive learning environments (pp. 245–255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, E., Harper, C. A., & Coady, M. R. (2013). Enhanced knowledge and skills for elementary mainstream teachers of English Language Learners. Theory in Practice, 52(2), 89–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.770326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, B. S., Maerten-Rivera, J., Rohrer, R. E., & Lee, O. (2014). Effectiveness of curricular and professional development intervention on elementary teachers’ science content knowledge and student achievement outcomes: Year 1 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 635–658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2014). Preparing content area teachers for disciplinary literacy instruction: The role of literacy teacher educators. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 444–448. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Moore, J. (2014). The linguistic challenges of learning across academic disciplines. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & G. P. Wallace (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (2nd ed., pp. 302–322). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, S., & Malagon, V. F. (2017). Unlocking learning: Science as a lever for English learner equity. Oakland, CA: The Education Trust—West.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. T. Adger, C. E. Snow, & D. Christian (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 7–54). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Franco-Fuenmayor, S. E., Padrón, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (2015). Investigating bilingual/ESL teachers’ knowledge and professional development opportunities in a large suburban school district in Texas. Bilingual Research Journal, 38(3), 336–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2015.1091049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gándara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Driscoll, A. (2005). Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs (pp. 1–32). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6430628z#page-5
   Google Scholar
• García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism, and education. New York (USA): Palgrave Macmillan Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In R. Yerrick, & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 19–37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Examining pedagogical contentknowledge: Theconstruct and its implications forscienceeducation. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3588504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2015). Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science. A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., & Alvarez, H. H. (2001). Literacy as hybridity: Moving beyond bilingualism in urban classrooms. In M. Reyes & J. J. Halcón (Eds.), The best for our children: Critical perspectives on literacy for latino students (pp. 122–141). New York (USA): Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hakuta, K. (1986). Mirror of language: The debate on bilingualism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. (1979). Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure, and their determination by different semantic functions. Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis, 1, 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London, England: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). What question would I be asking myself in my head?”: Helping all students reason mathematically. In M. Ellis (Ed.), Mathematics for every student: Responding to diversity, Grades (Vols. 6–8, pp. 23–37). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., … Human, P. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/30034819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochweber, J., Hosenfeld, I., & Klieme, E. (2014). Classroom composition, classroom management, and the relationship between student attributes and grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 289–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (2012). Comprehensive classroom management, creating communities of support and solving problems (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S. L., & Wiseman, D. L. (2006). Lessons learned from a research synthesis on the effects of teachers’ professional development on culturally diverse students. In K. Téllez & H. C. Waxman (Eds.), Preparing quality educators for English Language Learners (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S. L., & Wiseman, D. L. (2005). Professional development for teachers of diverse students: A summary of research. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(4), 387–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr1004_3
   Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643–680. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York (USA): Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2007). Science education and student diversity: Race/ethnicity, language, culture, and socioeconomic status. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 171–197). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2008). Science curriculum and student diversity: Culture, language, and socioeconomic status. Elementary School Journal, 109(2), 123–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/590522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non–English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027004012
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Llosa, L., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., & Van Booven, C. D. (2016). Elementary teachers‘ science knowledge and instructional practices: Impact of an intervention focused on english language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 579–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English Language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePage, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Akar, H., Gutierrez, C., Jenkins-Gunn, E., & Rosebrock, K. (2005). Classroom management. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 327–357). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsely, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, T., Villegas, A. M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education: Preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maerten-Rivera, J., Huggins, A. C., Adamson, K., Lee, O., & Llosa, L. (2015). Development and validation of a measure for elementary teachers’ science content knowledge in two multiyear teacher professional development intervention projects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 371–396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Massachusetts (USA): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Oakville, CT: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, J., Hussar, B., de Brey, C., Snyder, T., Wang, X., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., … Hinz, S. (2017, July 3). The condition of education 2017 (NCES 2017–144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017144
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (2011). Supporting grade 5–8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence, and reasoning framework for talk and writing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students‘ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. F. (2000). Representational tools and conceptual change: The young scientist’s tool kit. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 21–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00047-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J. N. (2015). Academic literacy in mathematics for English learners. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 43–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musanti, S. I., & Celedón-Pattichis, S. (2012). “They need to know they can do math”: Reaching for equity through native language in mathematics instruction with Spanish-speaking students. Journal of Bilingual Education Research & Instruction, 14(1), 80–94.
   Google Scholar
• Musanti, S. I., Celedón-Pattichis, S., & Marshall, M. E. (2009). Reflections on language and mathematics problem solving: A case study of a bilingual first-grade teacher. Bilingual Research Journal, 32(1), 25–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15235880902965763
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2014). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. New York (USA): Diversion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660271003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan-Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2013). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1135–1154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9303-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pando, M., & Aguirre-Muñoz, Z. (2018). Barnacles and Whales/Lapas y Ballenas: Integrating STEM concepts in reading comprehension while fostering heritage language in elementary education. New Mexico Journal of Reading,37(1), 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pando, M. & Aguirre-Muñoz, Z. (2019). Engaging English language learners in model-based science instruction. In L. C. de Oliveira, K. Obenchain, R. Kenney, & A. Oliveira (Eds), Teaching the content areas to English language learners in secondary schools: English language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies (pp. 215–230). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33–47). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, E. C., Maher, B. L., Coupland, D., Franchi, R., & Moje, E. B. (2018). But what does it look like? Illustrations of disciplinary literacy teaching in two content areas. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(4), 371–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S. C., & Clarke, S. N. N. (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., & Warren, B. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868–908. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Grammar, the sentence, and traditions of linguistic analysis. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of Research on W (pp. 549–564). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Téllez, K., & Waxman, H. (2006). Preparing quality educators for English language learners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Turkan, S., de Oliveira, L. C., Lee, O., & Phelps, G. (2014). Proposing a knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116(3), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwiers, J., & Crawford, M. (2011). Academic conversations: Classroom talk that fosters critical thinking and content understanding. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar