Motivational Factors in Computer-administered Integrated Skills Tasks: A Study of Young Learners

References

• AERA/APA/NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W., & Sidney, P. G. (2015). Variability in the natural number bias: Who, when, how, and why. Learning and Instruction, 37(1), 56–61. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L., Heritage, M., & Butler, F. A. (2014). Developmental considerations and curricular contexts in the assessment of young language learners. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 421–439). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L. (2017). Theoretical and developmental issues to consider in the assessment of young learners’ English language proficiency. In M.K. Wolf, & Y.G. Butler (Eds.), English language proficiency assessments for young learners (pp. 25-40). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Basca, E., & Csíkos, C. (2016). The role of individual differences in the development of listening comprehension in the early stages of language learning. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 263–289). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., & Demmrich, A. (2001). Test motivation in the assessment of student skills: The effects of incentives on motivation and performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(3), 441–462. doi:10.1007/BF03173192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (2002). The on-line motivation questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students’ context sensitivity. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. New directions in measures and methods (pp. 77–120). Amsterdam, Netherlands: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Iwashita, N., & McNamara, T. (2005). An examination of rater orientations and test-taker performance on English-for-academic purposes speaking tasks (ETS Research Report, RR-05-05). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Y. G. (2017). The role of affect in intraindividual variability in task performance for young learners. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 728–737. doi:10.1002/tesq.385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Lam, R. (2014). The examined life: Perspectives of lower primary school students in Hong Kong. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 42(3), 313–329. doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.689
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., & So, Y. (2014). Construct-irrelevant factors influencing young EFL learners’ perceptions of test task difficulty (TOEFL research memorandum ETS RM 14–04). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. London, UK: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Djigunović, J. M. (2016). Individual learner differences and young learners’ performance on L2 speaking tests. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 243–261). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklöf, H. (2006). Development and validation of scores from an instrument measuring student test-taking motivation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(5), 643–656. doi:10.1177/0013164405278574
   Google Scholar
• Eklöf, H., & Nyroos, M. (2013). Pupil perceptions of national tests in science: perceived importance, invested effort, and test anxiety. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 497–510.
   Google Scholar
• Eklöf, H. (2010). Skill and will: Test‐taking motivation and assessment quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 345–356. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.516569
   Google Scholar
• Finn, B. (2015). Measuring motivation in low‐stakes assessments. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(2), 1–17. doi:10.1002/ets2.12067
   Google Scholar
• Finney, S. J., Mathers, C. E., & Myers, A. J. (2016). Investigating the dimensionality of examinee motivation across instruction conditions in low-stakes testing contexts. Research and Practice in Assessment, 11, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, K., Elder, C., & Wigglesworth, G. (2011). Investigating the validity of an integrated listening-speaking task: A discourse-based analysis of test-takers’ oral performances. Language Testing, 29(3), 1–25. doi:10.1177/0265532211424479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselgreen, A., & Caudwell, G. (2016). Assessing the language of young learners. Bristol, UK: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (1992). The present state of interest research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 433–446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179. doi:10.3102/00346543070002151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C.-N., & Wang, Y. (2019). Speaking proficiency of young language students: A discourse-analytic study. Language Testing, 36(1), 27–50. doi:10.1177/0265532217734240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, E. E., Vincett, M., Vander Boom, E., Lau, C., & Yang, Y. B. (2017). Considering young learners’ characteristics in developing a diagnostic assessment intervention. In M. K. Wolf & Y. G. Butler (Eds.), English language proficiency assessments for young learners (pp. 193–213). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J., & Préfontaine, Y. (2017). Affective factors influencing fluent performance: French learners’ appraisals of second language speech tasks. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 699-716. doi:10.1177/1362168816683562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Winke, P. (2018). Young learners’ response processes when taking computerized tasks for speaking assessment. Language Testing, 35(2), 239–269. doi:10.1177/0265532217704009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., Bridgeman, B., & Adler, R. M. (2012). Measuring learning outcomes in higher education: Motivation matters. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 352–362. doi:10.3102/0013189X12459679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. D., Noels, K. A., & Clément, R. (1997). Biases in self‐ratings of second language proficiency: The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47(2), 265–287. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.8199700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, A. (2015). Seven essential considerations for assessing young learners. Modern English Teacher, 24(1), 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, A. S. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 89–101. doi:10.1080/01443410020019867
   Google Scholar
• McKay, P. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511733093
   Google Scholar
• Mozgalina, A. (2015). More or less choice? The influence of choice on task motivation and task engagement. System, 49(1), 120–132. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5, 159–168. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
   Google Scholar
• Nikolov, M. (Ed.). (2016). Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pae, T. I. (2013). Skill-based L2 anxieties revisited: Their intra-relations and the inter-relations with general foreign language anxiety. Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 232–252. doi:10.1093/applin/ams041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, S., & Cho, Y. (2014). An investigation of the use of TOEFL® Junior™ Standard scores for ESL placement decisions in secondary education. Language Testing, 31(2), 223–239. doi:10.1177/0265532213499750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Plakans, L., Gebril, A., & Bilki, Z. (2016). Shaping a score: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in integrated writing performances. Language Testing. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0265532216669537
   Google Scholar
• Poupore, G. (2014). The influence of content on adult L2 Learners’ task motivation: An interest theory perspective. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Second language processing. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 179–192). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• So, Y., Wolf, M. K., Hauck, M. C., Mollaun, P., Rybinski, P., Tumposky, D., & Wang, L. (2017). TOEFL Junior© design framework. In M. K. Wolf & Y. G. Butler (Eds.), English language proficiency assessments for young learners (pp. 59–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundre, D. L., & Moore, D. L. (2002). Assessment measures: The student opinion scale—A measure of examinee motivation. Assessment Update, 14(1), 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Valiente, C., Swanson, J., & Eisenberg, N. (2012). Linking students’ emotions and academic achievement: When and why emotions matter. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 129–135. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00192.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winke, P., Lee, S., Ahn, J. I., Choi, I., Cui, Y., & Yoon, H. J. (2018). The cognitive validity of child English language tests: What young language learners and their native‐speaking peers can reveal. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 274–303. doi:10.1002/tesq.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winke, P., Lee, S., Ahn, J. I., Choi, I., Cui, Y., & Yoon, H-J. (2018). The cognitive validity of child English language tests: What younglanguage learners and their native#speaking peers can reveal. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 274-303. doi:10.1002/tesq.2018.52.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Low examinee motivation in low-stakes assessment: Problems and potential solutions. Educationale first wrote the questionnaire items in Assessment, 10(1), 1–17. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S. L., & Kong, L. (2005). Response time effort: A new measure of examinee motivation in computer-based tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 18(2), 163–183. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.516569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. K., & Butler, Y. G. (2017). An overview of English language proficiency assessments for young learners. In M. K. Wolf & Y. G. Butler (Eds.), English language proficiency assessments for young learners (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39(4), 510–522. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar