Disentangling Attention for Frequency and Phonological Markedness in 9- and 12-Month-Old Infants

References

• Allen, G. D., & Hawkins, S. (1978). The development of phonological rhythm. In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds.), Syllables and segments. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Altvater-Mackensen, N. (2010). Do manners matter? Asymmetries in the acquisition of manner of articulation features. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, S. L., & Curtin, S. (2011). Perceiving onset clusters in infancy. Infant Behavior & Development, 34(4), 534–540. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Eprint arXiv:1406.5823. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 51. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Google Scholar
• Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T. O., & Basbøll, H. (2008). The danish communicative developmental inventories: Validity and main developmental trends. Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 651–669. doi:10.1017/S0305000907008574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer Program] (Version 5.1.25).
   Google Scholar
• Booij, G. E. (1995). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.nl/books/about/The_Phonology_of_Dutch.html?id=LT6E6YdAh-MC&redir_esc=y
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. B., Atkinson, D. J., & Chaput, H. (2000). Habit 2000: A new program for testing infant perception and cognition (version 2. 2. 5c) [computer software]. Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, J., & Bundy, R. S. (1981). A method for the measurement of infant auditory selectivity. Infant Behavior and Development, 4, 219–223. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(81)80025-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. P., & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development, 61(5), 1584–1595. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02885.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Databrary. (2012). The Databrary Project: A video data library for developmental science. New York: New York University. Retrieved from http://databrary.org.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. L., & MacNeilage, P. F. (1995). The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(6), 1199–1211. doi:10.1044/jshr.3806.1199
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, B. L., & MacNeilage, P. F. (2000). An embodiment perspective on the acquisition of speech perception. Phonetica, 57(2–4), 229–241. doi:10.1159/000028476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B. L., MacNeilage, P. F., Matyear, C. L., & Powell, J. K. (2000). Prosodic correlates of stress in babbling: An acoustical study. Child Development, 71(5), 1258–1270. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90312-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boysson-Bardies, B., & Vihman, M. M. (1991). Adaptation to language: Evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language, 67(2), 297–319. doi:10.1353/lan.1991.0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M., & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2011). Do production patterns influence the processing of speech in prelinguistic infants? Infant Behavior & Development, 34(4), 590–601. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaolis, R. A., Vihman, M. M., & Nakai, S. (2013). The influence of babbling patterns on the processing of speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 36(4), 642–649. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, B., Holm, A., Hua, Z., & Crosbie, S. (2003). Phonological development: A normative study of British English‐speaking children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17(8), 617–643. doi:10.1080/0269920031000111348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., Marschik, P. B., Tulviste, T., Almgren, M., Pérez Pereira, M., Wehberg, S., … Gallego, C. (2012). Differences between girls and boys in emerging language skills: Evidence from 10 language communities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 326–343. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02042.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. K. (2015). Why repetition? Repetitive babbling, auditory feedback, and cochlear implantation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 125–136. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-bates communicative development inventories: User’s guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A., & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language, 51(2), 419–439. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/412864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. The Hague: Leiden University. Holland Academic Graphics. Leiden, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Fikkert, P., & Levelt, C. (2008). How does place fall into place? contrast in phonology theory, perception, acquisition. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110208603.3.231
   Google Scholar
• Frank, M. C., Braginsky, M., Yurovsky, D., & Marchman, V. A. (2016). Wordbank: An open repository for developmental vocabulary data*. Journal of Child Language. Retrieved from http://langcog.stanford.edu/papers_new/frank-2016-jcl.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, D. M., Berent, I., Benavides-Varela, S., Bion, R. A. H., Cattarossi, L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2014). Language universals at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(16), 5837–5841. doi:10.1073/pnas.1318261111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halekoh, U., & Højsgaard, S. (2014). A kenward-roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models - The R package pbkrtest. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(9), 1–32. doi:10.18637/jss.v059.i09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, E. E., Soley, G., & Levine, R. S. (2011). Constraints on infants’ musical rhythm perception: Effects of interval ratio complexity and enculturation. Developmental Science, 14(4), 865–872. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01036.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75(4), 800–801. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 236–248. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, L. M. (2007). Universals in phonology. Phonology, 25(2007), 98–109. doi:10.1515/TLIR.2008.003
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, D. (1974a). Fronting in child phonology. Journal of Child Language, 1(2), 233–241. doi:10.1017/S0305000900000672
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, D. (1974b). Phonological rules in young children. Journal of Child Language, 1(1), 49–64. doi:10.1017/S0305000900000076
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1941). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. (Translated by A. Keiler, 1968). Den Haag-Parijs, SouthHolland, The Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. G. H., Van Doorn, J., & Mcleod, S. (2007). Does the number of syllables in words affect weak syllable deletion in typically developing children aged 3 to 7 years speaking Australian english? In World congress of the International Association of Logopedia and Phoniatrics (IALP), 27. Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/sitios/rehabilitacion-logo/silabas_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jarosz, G., Calamaro, S., & Zentz, J. (2016). Input frequency and the acquisition of syllable structure in Polish. Language Acquisition, 24(4), 361–399. doi:10.1080/10489223.2016.1179743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. K., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 548–567. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. doi:10.1037/a0028347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in english-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3–4), 159–207. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Jusczyk, A. M., Kennedy, L. J., Schomberg, T., & Koenig, N. (1995). Young infants’ retention of information about bisyllabic utterances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(4), 822–836. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994, October). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5), 630. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kager, R., Van Der Feest, S., Fikkert, P., Kerkhoff, A., & Zamuner, T. S. (2007). Representations of [voice]: Evidence from acquisition. In J. Van De Weijer & E. Van Der Torre (Eds.), Voicing in Dutch (pp. 41–80). Amsterdam, the Netherlands.: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/cilt.286.03kag
   Google Scholar
• Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Mandel, D. R., Myers, J., Turk, A., & Gerken, L. (1995). The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 18(1), 111–116. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(95)90012-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53(3), 983–997. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2533558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50(2), 93–107. doi:10.3758/BF03212211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, A., & Evers, V. (1991). Palatalization and coronality. In C. Paradis & J.-F. Prunet (Eds.), The special status of coronals: Internal and external evidence (pp. 79–100). Phonology and Phonetics 2. San Diego, USA.: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.A. S., Davis, B., & Macneilage, P. (2010). Universal production patterns and ambient language influences in babbling: a crosslinguistic study of Korean- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language, 37(2), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909009532
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-squares means: The {R} package {lsmeans}. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, C. C. (1994). On the acquisition of place. Leiden, the Netherlands.: Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, C. C., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). A developmental grammar for syllable structure in the production of child language and languages have different syllable inventories. in terms of CV-structure, other languages have an extensive inventory which includes CV, CVC, V. Brain and Language, 299, 291–299. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2092
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., & Kager, R. (2016). Perception of a native vowel contrast by Dutch monolingual and bilingual infants: A bilingual perceptual lead. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(3), 335–345. doi:10.1177/1367006914566082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeilage, P. F., Davis, B. L., Kinney, A., & Matyear, C. L. (2000). The motor core of speech: A comparison of serial organization patterns in infants and languages. Child Development, 71(1), 153–163. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddieson, I. (1991). Testing the Universality of phonological generalizations with a phonetically specified segment database: Results and limitations. Phonetica, 48(2–4), 193–206. doi:10.1159/000261884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majorano, M., Vihman, M. M., & DePaolis, R. A. (2014). The relationship between infants? production experience and their processing of speech. Language Learning and Development, 10(2), 179–204. doi:10.1080/15475441.2013.829740
   Google Scholar
• Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82(3), 101–111. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00157-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. (Ed.). (2007). The international guide to speech acquisition. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, Y., & Polka, L. (2016). The phonetic landscape in infant consonant perception is an uneven terrain. Cognition, 155, 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishibayashi, L. L., & Nazzi, T. (2016). Vowels, then consonants: Early bias switch in recognizing segmented word forms. Cognition, 155, 188–203. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, C., & Prunet Jean-Francois. (1991). Phonetics and phonology - the special status of Coronals: Internal and external evidence. (C. Paradis & PrunetJean-Francois, Eds.). Cambridge, USA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pons, F., & Bosch, L. (2010). Stress pattern preference in spanish-learning infants: The role of syllable weight. Infancy, 15(3), 223–245. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00016.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J., Aslin, R., & Newport, E. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(December), 926–928. doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   Google Scholar
• Schaadt, G., Hesse, V., & Friederici, A. D. (2015). Sex hormones in early infancy seem to predict aspects of later language development. Brain and Language, 141, 70–76. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, A., & Buckley, E. (2005). On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development, 1(3), 289–316. doi:10.1207/s15473341lld0103&4_4
   Google Scholar
• Shi, R. (2007). Infants ’ recognition of function words in continuous speech. In ICPhS XVI. (pp. 1541–1544). Saarbrü cken Univ. des Saarlandes 2007, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sloetjes, H., & Wittenburg, P. (2008). Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008). Proceedings, LREC 2008 : Proceedings 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Smolensky, P., Jusczyk, P. W., & Allocco, T. (2002). How english-learning infants respond to markedness and faithfulness constraints. Language Acquisition, 10(1), 31–73. doi:10.1207/S15327817LA1001
   Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1991). The Underspecification of Coronals: Evidence From Language Acquisition and Performance Errors. In The Special Status of Coronals: Internal and External Evidence (pp. 181–199). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-544966-3.50015-4
   Google Scholar
• Ter Haar, S. M., Kaemper, W., Stam, K., Levelt, C. C., & Ten Cate, C. (2014). The interplay of within-species perceptual predispositions and experience during song ontogeny in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 281(1796), 20141860. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk, A. E., Jusczyk, P. W., & Gerken, L. (1995). Do english-learning infants use syllable weight to determine stress? Language and Speech, 38(2), 143–158. doi:10.1177/002383099503800202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van De Weijer, J. C. (1998). Language input for word discovery. MPI series in psycholinguistics. Radboud University Nijmege, Nijmegen. https://doi.org/doi:10.17617/2.2057670
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Feest, S. (2007). Building a phonological lexicon: The acquisition of the Dutch voicing contrast in perception and production. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Waterson, N. (1971). Child phonology: A prosodic view. Journal of Linguistics, 7, 179–211. doi:10.1017/S0022226700002917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S. (2006). Sensitivity to word-final phonotactics in 9- to 16-month-old infants. Infancy, 10(1), 77–95. doi:10.1207/s15327078in1001_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S. (2009). Phonotactic probabilities at the onset of language development: Speech production and word position. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(1), 49–60. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0138)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S., Gerken, L., & Hammond, M. (2005). The acquisition of phonology based on input: A closer look at the relation of cross-linguistic and child language data. Lingua, 115(10), 1403–1426. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar