Two novel approaches to the content analysis of school mathematics textbooks

References

• Aaberge, Rolf. 2000. “Characterizations of Lorenz Curves and Income Distributions.” Social Choice & Welfare 17 (4): 639. doi:10.1007/s003550000046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abayomi, Kobl, and Tracy Yandle. 2012. “Using Conditional Lorenz Curves to Examine Consolidation in New Zealand Commercial Fishing.” Marine Resource Economics 27 (4): 303–321. doi:10.5950/0738-1360-27.4.303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alajmi, Amal Hussain. 2012. “How do Elementary Textbooks Address Fractions? A Review of Mathematics Textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 79 (2): 239–261. doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9342-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Paul, and Judy Sayers. 2015. “Identifying Opportunities for Grade One Children to Acquire Foundational Number Sense: Developing a Framework for Cross Cultural Classroom Analyses.” Early Childhood Education Journal 43 (4): 257–267. doi:10.1007/s10643-014-0653-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, Charles M., and Russell Davidson. 1983. “Distribution-free Statistical Inference with Lorenz Curves and Income Shares.” The Review of Economic Studies 50 (4): 723–735. doi:10.2307/2297772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergwall, Andreas, and Kirsti Hemmi. 2017. “The State of Proof in Finnish and Swedish Mathematics Textbooks—Capturing Differences in Approaches to Upper-Secondary Integral Calculus.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 19 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/10986065.2017.1258615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesen, Jesper, Ola Helenius, Ewa Bergqvist, Tomas Bergqvist, Johan Lithner, Torulf Palm, and Björn Palmberg. 2014. “Developing Mathematical Competence: From the Intended to the Enacted Curriculum.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 33 (1): 72–87. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Borba, Rute, and Ana Selva. 2013. “Analysis of the Role of the Calculator in Brazilian Textbooks.” ZDM 45 (5): 737–750. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0517-3.
   Google Scholar
• Bråting, Kajsa, Lars Madej, and Kirsti Hemmi. 2019. “Development of Algebraic Thinking: Opportunities Offered by the Swedish Curriculum and Elementary Mathematics Textbooks.” Nordisk Matematikkdidaktikk, NOMAD:[Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education] 24 (1): 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Charalambous, Charalambos Y., Seán Delaney, Hui-Yu Hsu, and Vilma Mesa. 2010. “A Comparative Analysis of the Addition and Subtraction of Fractions in Textbooks From Three Countries.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 12 (2): 117–151. doi:10.1080/10986060903460070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education [Electronic Resource]. 6. ed. ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delbosc, Alexa, and Graham Currie. 2011. “Using Lorenz Curves to Assess Public Transport Equity.” Journal of Transport Geography 19 (6): 1252–1259. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Meixia. 2016. “Opportunities to Learn: Inverse Relations in U.S. and Chinese Textbooks.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 18 (1): 45–68. doi:10.1080/10986065.2016.1107819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Jianqing, and Qiwei Yao. 2003. Nonlinear Time Series: Nonparametric and Parametric Methods. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, Taro. 2001. “The Order of Theorems in the Teaching of Euclidean Geometry: Learning From Developments in Textbooks in the Early 20th Century.” ZDM 33 (6): 196–203. doi:10.1007/BF02655671.
   Google Scholar
• Groot, Loek. 2010. “Carbon Lorenz Curves.” Resource and Energy Economics 32 (1): 45–64. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, James, Reto Ruedy, Mki Sato, and Ken Lo. 2010. “Global Surface Temperature Change.” Reviews of Geophysics 48: 4. doi:10.1029/2010RG000345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, Ole R. 1968. “Content Analysis.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 2, Research Methods, edited by Elliot Aronson and Gardner Lindzey, 596–692. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Jessica H., Arla Westenskow, Juanita Silva, and Jasmine Welch-Ptak. 2016. “Levels of Participatory Conception of Fractional Quantity along a Purposefully Sequenced Series of Equal Sharing Tasks: Stu’s Trajectory.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 41: 45–67. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntley, Mary Ann, and Maria S. Terrell. 2014. “One-Step and Multi-Step Linear Equations: A Content Analysis of Five Textbook Series.” ZDM 46 (5): 751–766. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0627-6.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchens, Robert M. 1991. “Segregation Curves, Lorenz Curves, and Inequality in the Distribution of People across Occupations.” Mathematical Social Sciences 21 (1): 31–51. doi:10.1016/0165-4896(91)90038-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Arne, Anita D. Milman, and Daniel M. Kammen. 2005. “Letting the (Energy) Gini Out of the Bottle: Lorenz Curves of Cumulative Electricity Consumption and Gini Coefficients as Metrics of Energy Distribution and Equity.” Energy Policy 33 (14): 1825–1832. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar, T., G. Güler, C. Şen, and E. Özdemir. 2018. “Comparing the Development of the Multiplication of Fractions in Turkish and American Textbooks.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 49 (2): 200–226. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2017.1355993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Yeping, Xi Chen, and Song An. 2009. “Conceptualizing and Organizing Content for Teaching and Learning in Selected Chinese, Japanese and US Mathematics Textbooks: The Case of Fraction Division.” ZDM 41 (6): 809–826. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0177-5.
   Google Scholar
• Löwenhielm, A., Gosia Marschall, Judy Sayers, and Paul Andrews. 2017. “Opportunities to Acquire Foundational Number Sense: A Quantitative Comparison of Popular English and Swedish Textbooks.” In Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, edited by T. Dooley and G. Gueudet, 371–378. Dublin: Dublin City University.
   Google Scholar
• Mesa, Vilma. 2004. “Characterizing Practices Associated with Functions in Middle School Textbooks: An Empirical Approach.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 56 (2): 255–286. doi:10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040409.63571.56.
   Google Scholar
• Miyakawa, Takeshi. 2017. “Comparative Analysis on the Nature of Proof to be Taught in Geometry: The Cases of French and Japanese Lower Secondary Schools.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 94 (1): 37–54. doi:10.1007/s10649-016-9711-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, Samuel, Nicholas J. Gilbertson, Lorraine M. Males, and D. Lee Clark. 2014. “The Mathematical Nature of Reasoning-and-Proving Opportunities in Geometry Textbooks.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 16 (1): 51–79. doi:10.1080/10986065.2014.857802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patty, W. W., and W. I. Painter. 1931. “Improving our Method of Selecting High-School Textbooks.” The Journal of Educational Research 24 (1): 23–32. doi:10.1080/00220671.1931.10880178.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, S., J. Heidmann, and M. Vaeth. 2001. “Lorenz Curves and Their Use in Describing the Distribution of ‘the Total Burden’ of Dental Caries in a Population.” Community Dental Health 18 (2): 68–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadras, Victor, and Rodolfo Bongiovanni. 2004. “Use of Lorenz Curves and Gini Coefficients to Assess Yield Inequality Within Paddocks.” Field Crops Research 90 (2-3): 303–310. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers, Judy, Jöran Petersson, Eva Rosenqvist, and Paul Andrews. 2019. “Opportunities to Learn Foundational Number Sense in Three Swedish Year One Textbooks: Implications for the Importation of Overseas-Authored Materials.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, doi:10.1080/0020739X.2019.1688406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutter, Charles Henry, and Richard L. Spreckelmeyer. 1959. Teaching the Third R: A Comparative Study of American and European Textbooks in Arithmetic. Washington: Council for Basic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sidenvall, Johan, Johan Lithner, and Jonas Jäder. 2015. “Students’ Reasoning in Mathematics Textbook Task-Solving.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 46 (4): 533–552. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2014.992986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, Ji-Won, and Sharon L. Senk. 2010. “How Reform Curricula in the USA and Korea Present Multiplication and Division of Fractions.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 74 (2): 117–142. doi:10.1007/s10649-010-9229-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, Kaye, and Jill Vincent. 2009. “Modes of Reasoning in Explanations in Australian Eighth-Grade Mathematics Textbooks.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 72 (3): 271–288. doi:10.1007/s10649-009-9193-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, Mary Kay, and Gooyeon Kim. 2009. “The Role of Mathematics Curriculum Materials in Large-Scale Urban Reform.” In Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction, edited by J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, and G. Lloyd, 37–55. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, Gabriel J. 2009. “Reasoning-and-Proving in School Mathematics Textbooks.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 11 (4): 258–288. doi:10.1080/10986060903253954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, James E., Óscar Chávez, Robert E. Reys, and Barbara J. Reys. 2006. “From the Written to the Enacted Curricula: The Intermediary Role of Middle School Mathematics Teachers in Shaping Students’ Opportunity to Learn.” School Science and Mathematics 106 (4): 191–201. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18075.x.
   Google Scholar
• Valbuena, Rubén, Jari Vauhkonen, Petteri Packalen, Juho Pitkänen, and Matti Maltamo. 2014. “Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning Methods for Estimating Forest Structure Indicators Based on Lorenz Curves.” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 95: 23–33. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, Gilbert A., Leonard J. Bianchi, Richard G. Wolfe, William H. Schmidt, and Richard T. Houang. 2002. According to the Book: Using TIMSS to Investigate the Translation of Policy Into Practice Through the World of Textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vasileiadou, Eleftheria, and Rens Vliegenthart. 2014. “Studying Dynamic Social Processes with ARIMA Modeling.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 17 (6): 693–708. doi:10.1080/13645579.2013.816257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, Jill, and Kaye Stacey. 2008. “Do Mathematics Textbooks Cultivate Shallow Teaching? Applying the TIMSS Video Study Criteria to Australian Eighth-Grade Mathematics Textbooks.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 20 (1): 82–107. doi: 10.1007/BF03217470
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Leland, and Michael Friendly. 2009. “The History of the Cluster Heat Map.” The American Statistician 63 (2): 179–184. doi:10.1198/tas.2009.0033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Emmet D., and Robert V. Shuff. 1963. “Comparative Study of SMSG and Traditional Mathematics Text Material.” The Mathematics Teacher 56 (7): 495–504. doi: 10.5951/MT.56.7.0495
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Margaret, and Dianzhou Zhang. 2006. “Overview of Curricular in the West and East.” In Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions – a Comparative Study of East Asia and the West: The 13th ICMI Study, edited by F. K. S. Leung, K. Graf, and F. J. Lopez-Real, 181–193. New York, PA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Der-Ching, Robert E. Reys, and Li-Lin Wu. 2010. “Comparing the Development of Fractions in the Fifth-and Sixth-Graders’ Textbooks of Singapore, Taiwan, and the USA.” School Science and Mathematics 110 (3): 118–127. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00015.x.
   Google Scholar