References
- Algorithm Watch. 2019. Automating Society 2019. Report, Algorithm Watch, Germany. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://algorithmwatch.org/en/automating-society-2019/.
- Alkhatib, A., and M. Bernstein. 2019. “Street-Level Algorithms: A Theory at the Gaps Between Policy and Decisions.” Computer Human Interaction Conference 2019, May 4-9, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300760
- Atkin, R. 2018. “Stop Replacing London’s Phone Boxes with Corporate Surveillance.” Wired, August 16. Accessed June 10, 2022. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/linkuk-bt-google-free-wifi-and-calls-london.
- Automating N. Y. C. 2022. “Automating NYC and (En)coding Inequality?” Accessed June 7, 2022. https://automating.nyc.
- Ballard, M. 2018. “Twenty Thousand Drug Deals on Five InLink Phone Kiosks in 15 Weeks.” E&T Engineering and Technology. Accessed June 10, 2022 https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2018/12/twenty-thousand-drug-deals-on-five-inlink-phone-kiosks/.
- Benjamin, R. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity.
- Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P. A. Hillgren. 2012. “Agonistic Participatory Design: Working with Marginalised Social Movements” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 127–144. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.672577.
- Bowker, G. C., and S. L. Star. 1999. Sorting Things out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Browne, S. 2015. Dark Matters. Durham, N.C: Duke University Press.
- Browning, M., and B. Arrigo. 2021. “Stop and Risk: Policing, Data, and the Digital age of Discrimination.” American Journal of Criminal Justice 46 (2): 298–316. doi:10.1007/s12103-020-09557-x
- Burdick, J., and J. A. Sandlin. 2010. “Inquiry as Answerability: Toward a Methodology of Discomfort in Researching Critical Public Pedagogies.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (5): 349–360. doi:10.1177/1077800409358878.
- Burford, R. 2019. “‘Smart’ Phone Boxes are a Honeypot for Drug Dealers, BT Told.” Evening Standard, April 12. Accessed June 10, 2022. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/smart-phone-boxes-are-a-honeypot-for-drug-dealers-bt-told-a4116226.html.
- Burnett, C., G. Merchant, and I. Guest. 2021. “Destabilising Data: The use of Creative Data Visualisation to Generate Professional Dialogue.” British Educational Research Journal 47 (1): 105–127. doi:10.1002/berj.3688.
- Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [BEIS]. 2021. The Use of Public Engagement for Technological Innovation. BEIS Research Paper Number 2021/003. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/955880/use-of-public-engagement-for-technological-innovation.pdf.
- Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research [CIFAR]. 2020. AI Futures Policy Lab Facilitator Guide. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://cifar.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ai-futures-policy-lab-facilitator-guide-en.pdf.
- Castañeda, L., and B. Williamson. 2021. “Assembling New Toolboxes of Methods and Theories for Innovative Critical Research on Educational Technology.” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 10 (1): 1–14. doi:10.7821/naer.2021.1.703.
- Chilvers, J., and M. Kearnes. 2020. “Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (3): 347–380. doi:10.1177/0162243919850885.
- Cifor, M., P. Garcia, T. L. Cowan, et al. 2019. Feminist Data Manifest-no. Accessed June 7, 2022 https://www.manifestno.com/.
- Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design Justice. Community-led Practices to Build the Worlds we Need. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Crawford, K. 2021. Atlas of AI. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Dahlstrom, M. F. 2014. “Using Narratives and Storytelling to Communicate Science with Nonexpert Audiences.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (Supplement 4): 13614–13620. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320645111.
- Data Justice Lab. 2021. Advancing Civic Participation in Algorithmic Decision-Making: A Guidebook for the Public Sector. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://datajusticelab.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/PublicSectorToolkit_english.pdf.
- Dencik, L., and J. Sanchez-Monedero. 2022. “Data Justice.” Internet Policy Review 11 (1), doi:10.14763/2022.1.1615.
- D’Ignazio, C., and L. F. Klein. 2020. “Seven Intersectional Feminist Principles for Equitable and Actionable COVID-19 Data.” Big Data & Society 7 (2), doi:10.1177/2053951720942544.
- DiSalvo, C. 2010. Design, Democracy and Agonistic Pluralism. Design Research Society (DRS) international conference, July 7-9, 2010, Montreal (Quebec), Canada. http://www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/031.pdf.
- DiSalvo, C. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Easterling, K. 2021. Medium Design: Knowing how to Work on the World. London: Verso Books.
- Education Futures Studio [EFS]. 2023. Education Futures Studio. Accessed February 21, 2022. https://education-futures-studio.sydney.edu.au/.
- Edvarson, S. 2019. “How to Interpret Sweden’s First GDPR Fine on Facial Recognition in School.” iapp, August 27. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://iapp.org/news/a/how-to-interpret-swedens-first-gdpr-fine-on-facial-recognition-in-school/.
- Ehn, P. 2008. “Participation in Design Things.” In: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design (Bloomington, Indiana, USA), 92–101. New York: ACM Press.
- Erler, M. 2019. “Playing Intelligence.” Journal of Design and Science. https://jods.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/0l8 × 7kip.
- Falk, J., G. Kannabiran, and N. B. Hansen. 2021. “What Do Hackathons Do? Understanding Participation in Hackathons Through Program Theory Analysis.” In: CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (May 8-13 2021, Yokohama, Japan), 1-16. ACM Digital Library.
- Fisher, C. 2019. An Algorithm is Attempting to Block Drug Deals at UK WiFi kiosks. Endgadget, April 12. Accessed June 10, 2022. https://www.engadget.com/2019-04-12-bt-inlink-uk-algorithm-block-calls.html.
- Fishkin, J. S. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gangneux, J., S. Joss, J. Humphry, M. Hanchard, C. Chesher, S. Maalsen, P. Merrington, and B. Wessels. 2022. “Situated, Yet Silent: Data Relations in Smart Street Furniture.” Journal of Urban Technology, doi:10.1080/10630732.2022.2036311.
- Gray, J., C. Gerlitz, and L. Bounegru. 2018. “Data Infrastructure Literacy.” Big Data & Society, doi:10.1177/2053951718786316.
- Halpern, O. 2014. Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason Since 1945. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Hao, K., and J. Stray. 2019. “Can You Make AI Fairer Than a Judge? Play our Courtroom Algorithm Game.” MIT Technology Review. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/10/17/75285/ai-fairer-than-judge-criminal-risk-assessment-algorithm/.
- Hendery, R., L. Magee, A. Perry and T. Swist. 2019. “Prototyping Through Play: Making an Urban Satellite Regional Hackathon.” Trace: A Journal of Writing, Media and Ecology, no. 3. http://tracejournal.net/trace-issues/issue3/issue3.html.
- Henricks, T. S. 2014. “Play as Self-Realization. Toward a General Theory of Play.” American Journal of Play 6 (2): 190–213. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1023798.pdf.
- Hintz, A., L. Dencik, and K. Wahl-Jorgensen. 2019. Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Humphry, J. 2021. “Looking for Wi-Fi: Youth Homelessness and Mobile Connectivity in the City.” Information, Communication & Society 24 (7): 1009–1023. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1670227.
- Humphry, J., C. Chesher, and S. Maalsen. 2021. Smart Street Furniture in Australia: A Public Service or Surveillance and Advertising Tool? The Conversation, 23 June. https://theconversation.com/smart-street-furniture-in-australia-a-public-service-or-surveillance-and-advertising-tool-157424.
- Humphry, J., S. Maalsen, J. Gangneux, C. Chesher, M. Hanchard, S. Joss, P. Merrington, and B. Wessels. 2022. “The Design and Public Imaginaries of Smart Street Furniture.” In Equality in the City: Imaginaries of the Smart Future, edited by Susan Flynn, 127–148. Bristol, UK: Intellect.
- InLinkUK, B. T. 2019. InLinkUK product statement (v3.0; May).
- Involve. 2019. How to Stimulate Effective Public Engagement on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Report, March. Involve: UK. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://www.involve.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/attachemnt/How%20to%20stimulate%20effective%20public%20debate%20on%20the%20ethics%20of%20artificial%20intelligence%20.pdf.
- Isin, E., and E. Ruppert. 2015. Being Digital Citizens. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
- James, A., D. Hynes, A. Whelan, T. Dreher, and J. Humphry. Forthcoming. “From Access to Refusal: Three Responses to Algorithmic Governance.” Internet Policy Review.
- Jasanoff, S. 2017. “Science and Democracy.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by U. Felt, R. Fouche, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr, 4th ed., 259–288. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Karasti, H., and A-L. Syrjänen. 2004. “Artful Infrastructuring in two Cases of Community PD.” In: Proceedings of the Eighth Participatory Design Conference (Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 27–31 July 2004), 20–30. New York: ACM Press.
- Kennedy, H., and M. Engebretson. 2020. “Introduction: The Relationships Between Graphs, Charts, Maps and Meanings, Feelings, Engagements.” In In Data Visualization in Society, edited by M. Engebretsen, and H. Kennedy, 19–32. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- Kimbell, L. 2019. “What if There Were More Policy Futures Studios?” Journal of Future Studies 23 (4): 129–136. doi:10.6531/JFS.201906_23(4).0014.
- Kose, N., and J.-L. Dugelay. 2014. “Mask Spoofing in Face Recognition and Countermeasures.” Image and Vision Computing 32 (10): 779–789. https://www.eurecom.fr/publication/4357. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2014.06.003
- Landers, R. N. 2014. “Developing a Theory of Gamified Learning.” Simulation & Gaming 45 (6): 752–768. doi:10.1177/1046878114563660.
- Laurent, B. 2016. “Political Experiments That Matter: Ordering Democracy from Experimental Sites.” Social Studies of Science 46 (5): 773–794. doi:10.1177/0306312716668587.
- Lezaun, J., N. Marres, and M. Tironi. 2017. “Experiments in Participation.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by U. Felt, R. Fouche, C. Miller, and E. Smith-Doer, 195–222. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Luo, Y., and R. Guo. 2021. “Facial Recognition in China: Current Status, Comparative Approach and the Road Ahead.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change 25 (2): 153–179. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jlasc/vol25/iss2/3.
- Maffei, S., F. Leoni, and B. Villari. 2020. “Data-driven Anticipatory Governance. Emerging Scenarios Indata for Policypractices” Policy Design and Practice 3 (2): 123–134. doi:10.1080/25741292.2020.1763896.
- Mann, M., P. Mitchell, M. Foth, and I. Anastasiu. 2020. “#BlockSidewalk to Barcelona: Technological Sovereignty and the Social License to Operate Smart Cities.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71 (9): 1103–1115. doi:10.1002/asi.24387
- Markham, A. 2021. “The Limits of the Imaginary: Challenges to Intervening in Future Speculations of Memory, Data, and Algorithms.” New Media & Society 23 (2): 382–405. doi:10.1177/1461444820929322.
- McQuillan, D. 2018. “People’s Councils for Ethical Machine Learning.” Social Media + Society, doi:10.1177/2056305118768303.
- Micheli, M., M. Ponti, M. Craglia, and A. B. Suman. 2020. “Emerging Models of Data Governance in the age of Datafication.” Big Data & Society, doi:10.1177/2053951720948087.
- Milan, S. 2019. “Acting on Data(Fication).” In Citizen Media and Practice: Currents, Connections, Challenges, edited by H. Stephansen, and E. Treré, 212–226. London: Routledge.
- Milan, S., and L. van der Velden. 2016. “The Alternative Epistemologies of Data Activism.” Digital Culture & Society 2 (2): 57–74. https://ssrn.com/abstract = 2850470. doi:10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
- Moss, E., E. A. Watkins, R. Singh, M. C. Elish, and J. Metcalf. 2021. Assembling Accountability: Algorithmic impact Assessment for the Public Interest. Report, Data & Society, New York. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://datasociety.net/library/assembling-accountability-algorithmic-impact-assessment-for-the-public-interest/.
- Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London, UK: Verso.
- Mueller, B. 2018. “Why Critics are Calling Britain’s New Phone Boxes a “Surveillance Network.” Independent. October 5. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/telephone-phone-boxes-surveillance-british-culture-public-space-london-long-reads-westminster-a8569096.html.
- Murphy, H. 2021. “Meet the Activists Perfecting the Craft of Anti-Surveillance.” Financial Times Magazine, June 25. https://www.ft.com/content/a0f8d8c5-ee5c-4618-bfbd-6bfb383b803e.
- Nassar, M. A., L. Luxford, P. Cole, G. Oatley, and P. Koutsakis. 2019. “The Current and Future Role of Smart Street Furniture in Smart Cities.” IEEE Communications Magazine 57 (6): 68–73. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2019.1800979
- O’Donnell, R. M. 2019. “Challenging Racist Predictive Policing Algorithms Under the Equal Protection Clause.” New York University Law Review 94: 544–580.
- Pallet, H., S. Burall, J. Chilvers, and C. Price. 2021. Public Engagement with Algorithms in Public Services. 3S Research Group Briefing Note. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://uea3s.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/public-engagement-with-algorithms-in-public-services.pdf.
- Park, S., and J. Humphry. 2019. “Exclusion by Design: Intersections of Social, Digital and Data Exclusion.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (7): 934–953. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606266.
- Rainie, L., and J. Anderson. 2017. Code-Dependent: Pros and Cons of the Algorithm Age. Pew Research Center. Accessed June 27, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/02/08/code-dependent-pros-and-cons-of-the-algorithm-age/.
- Reisdorf, B. C., and G. Blank. 2021. “Algorithmic Literacy and Platform Trust.” In Handbook of Digital Inequality, edited by E. Hargittai, 341–357. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Royal Society. 2018. Portrayals and Perceptions of AI and Why They Matter. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/ai-narratives/AI-narratives-workshop-findings.pdf.
- Sandlin, J. A., M. P. O’Malley, and J. Burdick. 2011. “Mapping the Complexity of Public Pedagogy Scholarship” Review of Educational Research 81 (3): 338–375. doi:10.3102/0034654311413395.
- Sant, E. 2019. “Democratic Education: A Theoretical Review (2006-2017).” Review of Educational Research 89 (5): 655–696. doi:10.3102/0034654319862493.
- Selwyn, N., C. O’Neill, G. Smith, M. Andrejevic, and X. Gu. 2023. “A Necessary Evil? The Rise of Online Exam Proctoring in Australian Universities.” Media International Australia, doi:10.1177/1329878X211005862.
- Selwyn, N., and L. Pangrazio. 2018. “Doing Data Differently? Developing Personal Data Tactics and Strategies Amongst Young Mobile Media Users.” Big Data & Society, doi:10.1177/2053951718765021.
- Shapiro, A. 2020. Design, Control, Predict: Logistical Governance in the Smart City. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
- Skellefteå kommun & tieto. 2018. Future Classroom – Summary. Do Innovative Technologies Have the Potential to Transform Presence Registration? Accessed June 7, 2022. http://pages.tieto.com/rs/517-ITT-285/images/SummaryFutureClassroom.pdf.
- Snow, T. 2019. Decision-Making in the Age of the Algorithm. Nesta. Accessed June 7. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Decision-making_in_the_age_of_the_algorithm.pdf.
- Söderström, O., T. Paasche, and F. Klauser. 2014. “Smart Cities as Corporate Storytelling.” City 18 (3): 307–320. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.906716.
- Somers, M. R. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory and Society 23 (5): 605–649. doi:10.1007/BF00992905.
- Swist, T., and L. Magee. 2017. “Academic Publishing and its Digital Binds: Beyond the Paywall Towards Ethical Executions of Code.” Culture Unbound 9 (3): 240–259. doi:10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1793240.
- Swist, T., and L. Magee. 2019. “Assemblages of Altruism in Urban Service Delivery: Seamful Designs and Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 41 (5): 618–629. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1527657.
- Swist, T., L. Magee, J. Phuong, and D. Sweeting. 2017. “The Labour of Communicating Publics: Participatory Platforms, Socio-Technical Intermediaries and Pluralistic Expertise.” Communication and the Public 2 (3): 210–225. doi:10.1177/2057047317719294.
- Whatmore, S. J., and C. Landstrom. 2011. “Flood Apprentices: An Exercise in Making Things Public” Economy and Society 40 (4): 582–610. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.602540.
- Whiteford, P. 2021. “Debt by Design: The Anatomy of a Social Policy Fiasco – Or was it Something Worse?” Australian Journal of Public Administration 80 (2): 340–360. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12479
- Whittlestone, J., R. Nyrup, A. Alexandrova, K. Dihal, and S. Cave. 2019. Ethical and Societal Implications of Algorithms, Data, and Artificial Intelligence: A Roadmap for Research. London: Nuffield Foundation. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Ethical-and-Societal-Implications-of-Data-and-AI-report-Nuffield-Foundat.pdf.
- Zolfi, A., S. Avidan, Y. Elovici, and A. Shabtai. 2021. “Adversarial Mask: Real-World Adversarial Attack Against Face Recognition Models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.10759.
- Zouridis, S., M. Bovens, and M. Van Eck. 2019. “Automated Discretion.” eLaw Working Paper Series No 2019/06. Accessed June 7, 2022. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/binaries/content/assets/rechtsgeleerdheid/instituut-voor-metajuridica/elaw-working-paper-series/wp.2019.006._zouridis-van-eck-and-bovens.pdf.