Teachers’ pass-on practices in whole-class discussions: how teachers return the floor to their students

References

• Applebee, A. N., J. A. Langer, M. Nystrand, and A. Gamoran. 2003. “Discussion-Based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle and High School English.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (3): 685–730. doi:10.3102/00028312040003685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. 1995. “Conversation Analysis: ‘Okay’ as a Clue for Understanding Consequentiality.” In The Consequentiality of Communication, edited by S. J. Sigman, 121–161. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., and M. G. McKeown. 2001. “Inviting Students into the Pursuit of Meaning.” Educational Psychology Review 13 (3): 225–241. doi:10.1023/A:1016671722022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. 1988. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. 1st ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann educational books, .
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., R. C. Anderson, and M. A. Waggoner. 2001. “Patterns of Discourse in Two Kinds of Literature Discussion.” Reading Research Quarterly 36 (4): 378–411. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.4.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasel Lauzon, V., and E. Berger. 2015. “The Multimodal Organization of Speaker Selection in Classroom Interaction.” Linguistics and Education 31: 14–29. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2015.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, J., N. Andrews, and A. Pitt. 2018. “Making Student Explanations Relevant in Whole Class Discussion.” In Language and Communication in Mathematics Education, edited by J. N. Moschkovich, D. Wagner, A. Bose, J. R. Mendes, and M. Schütte, 51–63. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75055-2_5.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 1986. “Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset.” Human Studies 9: 153–183. doi:10.1007/BF00148125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T., and J. Berenst. 2008. “Pupil Participation in Plenary Interaction.” In Interaction in Two Multicultural Mathematics Classrooms: Mechanisms of Inclusion and Exclusion, edited by J. Deen, M. Hajer, and T. Koole, 107–139. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 277–309. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. 2013. “Action Formation and Action Ascription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 103–130. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Margutti, P. 2010. “On Designedly Incomplete Utterances: What Counts as Learning for Teachers and Students in Primary Classroom Interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 43 (4): 315–345. doi:10.1080/08351813.2010.497629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. 2013. “Everyone and No One to Turn To: Intellectual Roots and Contexts for Conversation Analysis.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 11–31. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch4.
   Google Scholar
• Mazeland, H. 1983. “Sprecherwechsel in Der Schule.” In Kommunikation in Schule Und Hochschule: Linguistische Und Ethnomethodologische Analysen, edited by K. Ehlich and J. Rehbein, 77–101. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. 1978. “The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom.” Language in Society 7 (2): 183–213. doi:10.1017/S0047404500005522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., I. L. Beck, G. K. Ronette, and R. G. Blake. 2009. “Rethinking Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Comparison of Instruction for Strategies and Content Approaches.” Reading Research Quarterly 44 (3): 218–253. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge: Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2000. Words & Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. 2008. “Selecting Next Speaker in the Second Language Classroom: How to Find a Willing Next Speaker in Planned Activities.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (1): 55–79. doi:10.1558/japl.v5il.55.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., I. A. G. Wilkinson, A. O. Soter, M. N. Hennessey, and J. F. Alexander. 2009. “Examining the Effects of Classroom Discussion on Students’ Comprehension of Text: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (3): 740–764. doi:10.1037/a0015576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2006. “Talk, Talk, Talk: Teaching and Learning in Whole Class Discourse.” Research Papers in Education 21 (1): 19–41. doi:10.1080/02671520500445425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., L. L. Wu, A. Gamoran, S. Zeiser, and D. A. Long. 2003. “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Processes 35 (2): 135–198. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939. doi:10.2307/1519752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., L.-J. Kuo, A.-M. Clark, B. Miller, M. Jadallah, R. C. Anderson, and K. Nguyen‐Jahiel. 2009. “Collaborative Reasoning: A Dialogic Approach to Group Discussions.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (1): 29–48. doi:10.1080/03057640802701952.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696. doi:10.2307/412243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlström, F. 2001. “The Interactional Organization of Hand Raising in Classroom Interaction.” Journal of Classroom Interaction 37 (2): 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 1987. “Between Micro and Macro: Contexts and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, edited by J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, and N. J. Smelser, 207–234. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: Volume 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., and H. Sacks. 1973. “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M. A. 2014. “The Discursive Construction of Knowledge and Equity in Classroom Interactions.” Linguistics and Education Complete, 28: 79–91. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. 2013. “Basic Conversation Analytic Methods.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 77–100. Malden, MA: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch4.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., and T. Stivers, eds. 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch4.
   Google Scholar
• Solem, M. S. 2016. “Negotiating Knowledge Claims: Students’ Assertions in Classroom Interactions.” Discourse Studies 18 (6): 737–757. doi:10.1177/1461445616668072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soter, A. O., I. A. Wilkinson, P. Karen Murphy, L. Rudge, K. Reninger, and M. N. Edwards. 2008. “What the Discourse Tells Us: Talk and Indicators of High-Level Comprehension.” International Journal of Educational Research 47 (6): 372–391. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., and F. Rossano. 2010. “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. doi:10.1080/08351810903471258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veen, C., C. Van Kruistum, and S. Michaels. 2015. “Productive Classroom Dialogue as an Activity of Shared Thinking and Communicating: A Commentary on Marsal.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 22 (4): 320–325. doi:10.1080/10749039.2015.1071398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lier, L. 1988. The Classroom and the Language Learner. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Willemsen, A., M. N. Gosen, M. van Braak, T. Koole, and K. de Glopper. 2018. “Teachers’ Open Invitations in Whole-Class Discussions.” Linguistics and Education 45: 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar