Locating data use in the microprocesses of district-level deliberations

References

• Armstrong, J., & Anthes, K. (2001). How data can help: Putting information to work to raise student achievement. American School Board Journal, 188(11), 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Asen, R., & Gurke, D. (2014). The research on education, deliberation, and decision-making (REDD) project. In K. S. Finnegan & A. J. Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education (pp. 53–68). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Asen, R., Gurke, D., Solomon, R., Conners, P., & Gumm, E. (2011). The research says: Definitions and uses of a key policy term in federal law and local school boards. Argumentation and Advocacy, 47, 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, A. J. (2002). Contentious curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, V., & Wayman, J. C. (2014). Districts’ efforts for data use and computer data systems: The role of sensemaking in system use and implementation. Teachers College Record, 116(2), 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–349. doi:10.3102/00028312043003343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Bae, S., & Turner, E. O. (2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider–outsider partnerships at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 364–399. doi:10.1080/01619560802222350
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: Mapping the terrain. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 469–495. doi:10.1086/505056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., Touré, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1115–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E, & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5–30. doi: 10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosner, S. (2011). Teacher learning, instructional considerations and principal communication: Lessons from a longitudinal study of collaborative data use by teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(5), 568–589. doi:10.1177/1741143211408453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M. (2008). Leadership for evidence-informed conversations. In L. M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 43–52). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Farley-Ripple, E. N. (2012). Research use in school district central office decision making: A case study. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40, 786–806. doi:10.1177/1741143212456912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley-Ripple, E. N., & Buttram, J. L. (2014). Developing collaborative data use through professional learning communities: Early lessons from Delaware. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 41–53. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, S. A. (1993). Impression formation in asymmetrical power relationships: Does power corrupt absolutely? Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Henig, J. R. (2012). The politics of data use. Teachers College Record, 114(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, I., Kane, B. D., & Wilson, J. (2015). Making sense of student performance data: Data use logics and mathematics teachers’ learning opportunities. American Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 208–242. doi:10.3102/0002831215573773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huguet, A., Marsh, J. A., & Farrell, C. C. (2014). Building teachers’ data-use capacity: Insights from strong and developing coaches. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(52), n52.
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, J. B., & Wayman, J. C. (2015). Professional learning for using data: Examining teacher needs and supports. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. L. (1999). The politics of research-information use in the education policy arena. Educational Policy, 13(1), 23–36. doi:10.1177/0895904899131003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M., & Kennedy, M. M. (1982). Evidence and decision. In M. M. Kennedy (Ed.), Working knowledge and other essays (pp. 59–103). Cambridge, MA: The Huron Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496–520. doi:10.1086/505057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143–166. doi:10.1086/663271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling for high school principals’ data-driven decision making: An analysis of information use environments. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 603–634. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., & Farrell, C. C. (2015). How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making A framework for understanding capacity building. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 269–289. doi:10.1177/1741143214537229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005). Organizations and movements. In G. F. Davis, D.  McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.). Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4–40). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Chen, E., DeBarger, A., & Padilla, C. (2011). Teachers’ ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Gallagher, L., & Padilla, C. (2007). Teachers’ use of student data systems to improve instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Padilla, C., & Gallagher, L. (2010). Use of education data at the local level: From accountability to instructional improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.
   Google Scholar
• Park, V., Daly, A. J., & Guerra, A. W. (2013). Strategic framing: How leaders craft the meaning of data use for equity and learning. Educational Policy, 27(4), 645–675. doi:10.1177/0895904811429295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, L., & Nodine, T. (2005). Anatomy of school system improvement: Performance-driven practices in urban school districts. San Francisco, CA: Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Jr, Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. doi:10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141. doi:10.1086/663283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P, & Miele, D. B. (2007). Chapter 3: evidence in practice: a framing of the terrain. Yearbook Of The National Society For The Study Of Education, 106(1), 46–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00097.x
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2008). Evidence-informed conversations making a difference to student achievement. In L. M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 66–79). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Dimock, A. (2004). Meetings: Discursive sites for building and fragmenting community. Annals of the International Communication Association, 28(1), 127–165. doi:10.1080/23808985.2004.11679034
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., Jimerson, J. B., & Spikes, D. D. (2012). District-wide effects on data use in the classroom. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(25), 25–28. doi:10.14507/epaa.v20n25.2012
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Science Communication, 1(3), 381–404. doi:10.1177/107554708000100303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980). Social science research and decision-making. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, V. M. (2006). Teachers’ use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 521–548. doi:10.1086/505058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar