The power of teacher-assigned grades in outcome-based education

References

• Adolfsson, C. H. (2013). Kunskapsfrågan: En läroplansteoretisk studie av den svenska gymnasieskolans reformer mellan 1960-talet och 2010-talet (Doctoral dissertation). Linnaeus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High- stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45. doi:10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, E. (2016). Research to controversy in 10 decades. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 122–133. doi:10.3102/0013189X16639048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev ed.). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet, G. (1997). Country profile from France. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(2), 295–306. doi:10.1080/0969594970040206
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2015). Graded achievement, tested achievement, and validity. Educational Assessment, 20(4), 268–296. doi:10.1080/10627197.2015.1093928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., … Welsh, M. E. (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803–848. doi:10.3102/0034654316672069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, P. (2012). A social history of knowledge II: From the encyclopédie to wikipedia. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wilhoit, G., & Pittenger, L. (2014). Accountability for college and career readiness: Developing a new paradigm. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(86), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S., & Jacob, B. (2011). The impact of no child left behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 418–446. doi:10.1002/pam.20586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dir. 1990:62. Kommittédirektiv. Tillkallande av en beredning för att ge förslag till ett nytt betygssystem i grundskolan, gymnasieskolan och den kommunala vuxenutbildningen (Beslut vid regeringssammanträde 1990-10-25). Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Dir. 1991:104. Kommittédirektiv. Tilläggsdirektiv till beredningen (U 1990:07) för att ge förslag till ett nytt betygssystem i grundskolan, gymnasieskolan och den kommunala vuxenutbildningen (dir. 1990:62) (Beslut vid regeringssammanträde 1991-12-05). Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Dir. 1991:53. Kommittédirektiv. Tilläggsdirektiv till beredningen (U 1990:07) för att ge förslag till ett nytt betygssystem i grundskolan, gymnasieskolan och den kommunala vuxenutbildningen (dir. 1990:62) (Beslut vid regeringssammanträde 1991-06-20). Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Ds 1990:60. Betygens effekter på undervisningen (Letter of Ministry of Education and Research).
   Google Scholar
• Ds 2008:13. En ny betygsskala (Letter of Ministry of Education and Research).
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, S. (1991). Minnesanteckningar från sammanträde nr 9 I den parlamentariska beredningen för utredning av betygsfrågor. 1991-10-16 (Riksarkivet, Betygsberedningens arkiv, SE/RA/324219, volume 1).
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, S. (1992). Minnesanteckningar från sammanträde nr 21 i den parlamentariska beredningen för utredning av betygsfrågorna. 1992-08-04 (Riksarkivet, Betygsberedningens arkiv, SE/RA/324219, volume 4).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Key data on education in Europe 2012. Retrieved from http://bookshop.europa.eu/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/EU-Bookshop-Site/en_GB/-/EUR/ViewPublication-Start?PublicationKey=ECAF12001
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015a). European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2015 (Assuring Quality in Education: Policies and Approaches to School Evaluation in Europe. Eurydice Report). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://bookshop.europa.eu/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/EU-Bookshop-Site/en_GB/-/EUR/ViewPublication-Start?PublicationKey=EC0414939
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015b). Structural indicators for monitoring education and training systems in Europe – 2015. Eurydice background report to the education and training monitor 2015 (Eurydice Report). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/190EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice (2016). Network on education policies and systems in Europe. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/index_en.php
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, L. (1997). Minnen från skilda arenor. In G. Richardsson (Ed.), Spjutspets mot framtiden? Skolministrar, riksdagsmän och SÖ-chefer om skola och skolpolitik (pp. 135–156). Uppsala: Föreningen för svensk undervisningshistoria.
   Google Scholar
• Halpin, D., & Troyna, B. (1995). The politics of education policy borrowing. Comparative Education, 31(3), 303–310. doi:10.1080/03050069528994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students´ motivation for learning (EPPI-Centre Review, version 1.1*). In Research evidence in educational library (Vol. Issue 1). London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. N., & Herrington, C. D. (2006). Accountability, standards, and the growing achievement gap: Lessons from the past half-century. American Journal of Education, 112(2), 209–238. doi:10.1086/498995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2003). On the evaluation of curriculum reforms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 459–478. doi:10.1080/00220270305520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, L. (1997). Konfrontation eller resultatpolitik? In G. Richardsson (Ed.), Spjutspets mot framtiden? Skolministrar, riksdagsmän och SÖ-chefer om skola och skolpolitik (pp. 177–192). Uppsala: Föreningen för svensk undervisningshistoria.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147. doi:10.1080/17508481003731026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C. (2006). Viljan att veta vad andra vet. Kunskapsbedömning i tidigmodern, modern och senmodern skola (Doctoral dissertation). Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C. (2009). Varför nationella prov? Framväxt, dilemman, möjligheter. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C., Hultén, M., & Tveit, S. (2017). Betygssystem i internationell belysning. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C., Hutlén, M., Klapp, A., & Mickwitz, L. (2015). Betygens geografi – forskning om betyg och summativa bedömningar i Sverige och internationellt (Delrapport från skolforsk-projektet. Vetenskapsrådet). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C. (2008). Inter/national assessments as national curriculum: The case of Sweden. In M. Lawn (Ed.), An atlantic crossing? The work of the international examination inquiry, its researchers, methods and influence (pp. 157–180). Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C., & Waldow, F. (2009). Standardisation and ”quick languages”: The shape-shifting of standardised measurement of pupil achievement in Sweden and Germany. Journal of Comparative Education, 45(3), 365–385. doi:10.1080/03050060903184940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2013). Educational marketization the Swedish way. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 497–517. doi:10.3402/edui.v4i3.22620
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, L. (2015). En reformerad lärare: Konstruktionen av en professionell och betygssättande lärare i skolpolitik och skolpraktik (Doctoral dissertation). Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik, Stockholms universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, A. (2014). Crisis as a discursive legitimation strategy in educational reforms: A critical policy analysis. Education Inquiry, 5(1), 109–126. doi:10.3402/edui.v5.24047
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Grade expectations: How marks and education policies shape students’ ambitions. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Improving Schools in Sweden. An OECD Perspective. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/Improving-Schools-in-Sweden.pdf
   Google Scholar
• PM 2014-08-20 (2014). U2014/4873/S En bättre skolstart för alla: Bedömning och betyg för progression i lärandet. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Research in Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Policy bill 1988/89:4. Om skolans utveckling och styrning. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Policy bill 1990/91:18. Om ansvaret för skolan. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Policy bill 2008/09:87. Tydligare mål och kunskapskrav – nya läroplaner för skolan. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet
   Google Scholar
• Ringarp, J., & Waldow, F. (2016). From‘silent borrowing’ to the international argument – legitimating Swedish educational policy from 1945 to the present day. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Education Policy (pp. 128–144). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schriewer, J. (1988). The method of comparison and the need for externalization: Methodological criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer & B. Holmes (Eds.), Theories and methods in comparative education. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Silova, I. (2009). Varieties of educational transformation: The post-socialist states of central/Southeastern Europe and the former soviet union. In R. Cowen & A. M. Kazamias (Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 295–320). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511. doi:10.1007/BF00993595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 743–762. doi:10.1037/a0027627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Official Reports. (1992a). SOU 1992:86. In Ett nytt betygssystem: Slutbetänkande av Betygsberedningen. Stockholm: Allmänna förlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Official Reports. (1992b). SOU 1992:94. In Skola för bildning: Huvudbetänkande av Läroplanskommittén. Stockholm: Allmänna förlaget
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Official Reports. (2016). SOU 2016:38. In Samling för skolan. Nationella målsättningar och utvecklingsområden för kunskap och likvärdighet. Delbetänkande från Skolkommissionen.Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Tarschys, D., & Lemne, M. (Eds.). (2013). Vad staten vill: Mål och ambitioner i svensk politik. Mörklinta: Gidlunds.
   Google Scholar
• Tveit, S., & Lundahl, C. (submitted). New modes of policy legitimation in education: (Mis)using comparative data to effectuate assessment reform. European Educational Research Journal.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijn, P. W., Béguin, A. A., & Verstralen, H. H. F. M. (2012). Educational measurement issues and implications of high stakes decision making in final examinations in secondary education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 117–136. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.591289
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2015). Theory-based evaluation of the curriculum Lgr 11. Uppsala: Institute for Evaluation of Labor Market and Education Policy (IFAU).
   Google Scholar
• Waldow, F. (2014). Conceptions of justice in the examination systems of England, Germany, and Sweden: A look at safeguards of fair procedure and possibilities of appeal. Comparative Education Review, 58(2), 322–343. doi:10.1086/674781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, W. W., Pollack, J. M., & Lewis, C. (2002). Grades and test scores: Accounting for observed differences. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39(1), 1–37. doi:10.1111/jedm.2002.39.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar