National testing data in Norwegian classrooms: a tool to improve pupil performance?

References

• Aasebøe, T. (2015). Teachers’ discourse about the Norwegian national tests. In S. St. Hillen & A. Aprea (Eds.), Instrumentalism in education – where is Bildung left? (pp. 59–71). Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: The University Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allerup, P., Kovac, V., Kvåle, G., Langfeldt, G., & Skov, P. (2009). Evaluering av det Nasjonale kvalitetsvurderingssystemet for grunnopplæringen. Kristiansand: Agderforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S, Leithwood, K, & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 292–327. doi:10.1080/15700761003731492
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (1995). Education and power. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2008). Devising inequality: A Bernsteinian analysis of high‐stakes testing and social reproduction in education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(6), 639–651. doi:10.1080/01425690802423312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, K., & Sivesind, K. (2012). Kunnskapsløftet som reformprogram: Fra betingelser til forventninger. In T. Englund, E. Forsberg, & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Vad räknas som kunskap?: Läroplansteoretiska utsikter och inblickar i lärarutbildning och skola (pp. 242–260). Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2007). Education plc: Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2013). Global education inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy. Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). The pedagogic device. In B. Bernstein (ed.), Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (pp. 25–39). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B., & Solomon, J. (1999). ‘Pedagogy, identity and the construction of a theory of symbolic control’: Basil Bernstein questioned by Joseph Solomon. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 265–279. doi:10.1080/01425699995443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S. (1994). In an age of experts. The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, P., & Spillane, J. P. (2006). The institutional environment and instructional practice: Changing patterns of guidance and control in public education. In H. D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 87–102). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chavannes, I., Engesveen, H., & &; Strand, E. (2011). Nasjonale prøver som grunnlag for skoleutvikling og kontroll ( Master thesis). University of Oslo. Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., & Bellara, A. (2013). The current state of assessment education: Aligning policy, standards, and teacher education curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 356–372. doi:10.1177/0022487113488144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B. (2007). Where the rubber meets the road: Rethinking the connection between high-stakes testing policy and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education, 80, 285–313. doi:10.1177/003804070708000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstad, E. (2009). Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: School accountability in Norway. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(2), 173–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstad, E., Hopmann, S., & Langfeldt, G. (2008). Ansvarlighet i skolen. politiske spørsmål og pedagogiske svar: resultater fra forskningsprosjektet [Achieving school accountability in practice]. Oslo: Cappelen akademisk forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Engeland, Ø., Langfeldt, G., & Roald, K. (2008). Kommunalt handlingsrom. Hvordan forholder norske kommuner seg til ansvarsstyring i skolen? In G. Langfeldt, E. Elstad, & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Ansvarlighet i skolen. Politiske spørsmål og pedagogiske svar. Resultater fra forskningsprosjektet [Achieving school accountability in practice] (pp. 178–203). Oslo: Cappelen akademisk forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2008). The management of professionalism: A contemporary paradox? In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 19–30). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz, J, Davies, B, & Evans, J. (2005). Education policy and social reproduction: class inscription & symbolic control. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Følgjegruppa for lærarutdanningsreforma (Ffl) / Munthe, E., Henriksen, M., Hjetland, H., Hustad, B., Isaksen, T., Jahr, H., … Werler, T. (2011). Frå allmennlærar til grunnskulelærar. Innfasing og oppstart av nye grunnskulelærarutdanningar. Rapport nr. 1 frå Følgjegruppa til Kunnskapsdepartementet. Stavanger: Universitetet i Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Følgjegruppa for lærarutdanningsreforma (Ffl) / Munthe, E., Henriksen, M., Hjetland, H., Hustad, B., Isaksen, T., Jahr, H., … Werler, T. (2015). Grunnskulelærarutdanningane etter fem år. Status, utfordringar og vegar vidare. (Teacher Education after five years. Status, challenges and the way ahead) Rapport nr. 5 frå Følgjegruppa til Kunnskapsdepartementet. Stavanger: Universitetet i Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, M. E., Nabors Oláh, L., & Riggan, M. (2010). From testing to teaching: The use of interim assessments in classroom instruction. CPRE Research Report (No. RR-65), Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. (2003). Accountability in modern government. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 557–568). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘Effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi:10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøgaard, J. B., Helland, H., & Lauglo, J. (2008). Elevenes læringsutbytte: Hvor stor betydning har skolen? En analyse av ulikhet i elevers prestasjonsnivå i fjerde, syvende og tiende trinn i grunnskolen og i grunnkurset i videregående [Pupil learning outcomes: How much influence does the school have? An analysis of inequalities in pupils' achievement in fourth, seventh and tenth grade in basic school and in first grade in upper secondary school]. Oslo: NIFU.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74. doi:10.1177/0003122409357044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, T. (2013). Beneath the surface of accountability: Answerability, responsibility and capacity-building in recent education reforms in Norway. Journal of Educational Change, 14(2), 113–138. doi:10.1007/s10833-012-9206-1
   Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456. doi:10.1080/00220270801989818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, S. T. (2013). The end of schooling as we know it? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/00220272.2013.767570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, T., & Hjelm Solli, A. (2014). Resultatene er kommet! Hva nå? Nasjonale prøver – fra fokus på resultat til utvikling av kvalitet [The results have come! What now? National tests – from focus on results to quality development] ( Master thesis). Universitetet i Tromsø. Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning. Tromsø.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, N. (2015). Kartlegging som en ressurs for elever med lese- og skrivevansker. En kvalitativ studie på mellomtrinnet [Mapping as a resource for students with reading and writing difficulties. A qualitative intermediate stage study] ( Master thesis). University College of Hedmark. Hamar.
   Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., & Engelsen, B.U. (2013). Læreplanen for Kunnskapsløftet: Velkjente tråkk og nye spor [The curriculum for the Knowledge Promotion: Well-known trails and new tracks]. In Karseth, B., Møller, J. & Aasen, P. Reformtakter. Om fornyelse og stabilitet i grunnopplæringen [Reform measures about renewal and stability in basic education]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 43-60.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research [89 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0601211
   Google Scholar
• Larson, M. S. (2012). Rise of professionalism. Monopolies of competence and sheltered markets. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, M. (2013). Introduction: The rise of data in education. In M. Lawn (Ed.) The rise of data in education systems: Collection, visualization and use (pp. 7–11). Oxford: Symposium Books. doi:10.1177/1753193412470225
   Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L. (2013). Test-based accountability. The Gordon Commission on the future of assessment in education. Retrieved May 5, 2016, from http://www.gordoncommission.org/publications_reports/assessment_education.html
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., Ball, S. J., & Braun, A. (2010). Behaviour, classroom management and student ‘control’: Enacting policy in the english secondary school. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20(2), 153–170. doi:10.1080/09620214.2010.503066
   Google Scholar
• Malkenes, S. (2014). Bak fasaden i Osloskolen [Behind the facade of Oslo school district]. Oslo: Res Publica.
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E., Friedman, J., & Gummer, E. (2015). How can schools of education help to build educators’ capacity to use data? A systemic view of the issue. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S. (2013a). A research review of the impact of accountability policies on teachers’ workplace relations. Educational Research Review, 9, 16–33. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S. (2013b). Reshaping teacher professionalism. An analysis of how teachers construct and negotiate professionalism under increasing accountability ( PhD thesis). Oslo: Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., & Granlund, L. (2012). Contested discourses of teacher professionalism: Current tensions between education policy and teachers’ union. Journal of Education Policy, 27(6), 815–833. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.672656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. New York, NY: Houghton.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 365–380). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2002). Qualitative content analysis – Research instrument or mode of interpretation? In M. Kiegelmann (ed.), The role of the researcher in qualitative psychology (pp. 139–148)). Tuebingen: Verlag Ingeborg Huber.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.) 2013. PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. D., & Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism in education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J., & Hernández, F. (2010). On the geography of accountability: Comparative analysis of teachers’ experiences across seven European countries. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 307–322. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9126-x
   Google Scholar
• Nasjonalt råd for lærerutdanning (NRLU). (2016a). Nasjonale retningslinjer for femårig grunnskolelærerutdanning, trinn 1–7. Oslo: Universitets- og høgskolerådet. Retrieved December 1, 2016, from http://www.uhr.no/documents/Godkjent_1_7_010916.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nasjonalt råd for lærerutdanning (NRLU). (2016b). Nasjonale retningslinjer for femårig grunnskolelærerutdanning, trinn 5–10. Oslo: Universitets- og høgskolerådet. Retrieved December 1, 2016, from http://www.uhr.no/documents/Godkjent_5_10__010916.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, R, & Chick, H. (2011). Teachers’ intentions to use national literacy and numeracy assessment data: A pilot study. 38(4), 433–447. doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0040-x
   Google Scholar
• Popham, J. (2007). The no-win accountability game. In C. Glickman (ed.), Letters to the next President. What we can do about the real crisis in public education (pp. 166–173). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S. (2015). Uploading, downloading and uploading again-concepts for policy integration in education research. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(1), 27015. doi:10.3402/nstep.v1.27015
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Kemmis, S. (1987). Dilemmas of reform. An overview of issues and achievements of the participation and equity program in victorian schools 1984–1986. Geelong: Deakin Institute for Studies in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Romzeck, B., & Dubnick, M. (1993). Accountability and the centrality of expectations in american public administration. In J. Perry (ed.), Research in public administration (pp. 37–78). London: Jai Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism and the study of educational organizations: Changing ideas for changing times. In D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 15–32). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2010). Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 45–61. doi:10.1007/s10833-008-9098-2
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., Ehren, M., & Lai, M. (2012). Editorial article for the special issue on data-based decision making around the world: From policy to practice to results. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 23(2), 123–131. doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.652122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seland, I., Vibe, N., & Hovdhaugen, E. (2013). Evaluering av nasjonale prøver som system [Evaluation of the national test system]. Oslo: NIFU.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571–582. doi:10.1080/0142569022000038422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P. (2015). Pedagogic governance: Theorising with/after Bernstein. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1–20. doi:10.1080/01425692.2015.1081052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, P., Thomas, S., & Harris, J. (2013). Recontextualising policy discourses: A Bernsteinian perspective on policy interpretation, translation, enactment. Journal of Education Policy, 28(4), 465–480. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.770554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G. (2011). Formulation and realisation of evaluation policy: Inconcistencies and problematic issues. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23, 5–20. doi:10.1007/s11092-010-9110-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, L. G., & Karlsson, A. (2008). Profesjoner, kontroll og ansvar [Professions, control and responsibility]. In A. Molander & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier [Studies of professions] (pp. 261–274). Oslo: Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, K. (2008). The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate. Comparative Education, 44(4), 387–407. doi:10.1080/03050060802481413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. Y., & Brady, K. P. (2005). Chapter 3: The elementary and secondary education act at 40: equity, accountability, and the evolving federal role in public education. Review of Research in Education, 29(1), 51–67. doi:10.3102/0091732X029001051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., Lingard, B., & Wrigley, T. (2012). Introduction: Ideas for changing educational systems, educational policy and schools. Critical Studies in Education, 53(1), 1–7. doi:10.1080/17508487.2011.636451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tveit, S. (2014). Educational assessment in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 221–237.
   Google Scholar
• Union of Education Norway. (2012). Professional ethics for the teaching profession. Oslo: Utdanningsforbundet. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from https://www.utdanningsforbundet.no/upload/1/L%C3%A6rerprof_etiske_plattform_a4_engelsk_31.10.12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet/ Udir. (2010). Rammeverk for nasjonale prøver. Oslo. Retrieved May 12, 2016, from http://www.udir.no/Upload/Nasjonale_prover/2010/5/Rammeverk_NP_22122010.pdf?epslanguage=no
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet/ Udir. (2014). Til lærere. Hvordan bruke nasjonale prøver som redskap for læring? Oslo. Retrieved May 12, 2016, from http://www.udir.no/PageFiles/84379/Larerbrosjyre-bokmal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet/ Udir. (2016). Metodegrunnlag for nasjonale prøver. Oslo: Udir. Retrieved December 01, 2016, from http://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/vurdering/nasjonaleprover/metodegrunnlag-for-nasjonale-prover.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519–558. doi:10.3102/0002831207306859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, P. (2013). Mål- og resultatstyring i grunnskolen. Bidrar mål- og resultatstyring til gode resultater? [New public management in primary school. Does new public management  contribute to good results?] ( Master thesis). Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus, Fakultet for samfunnsfag. Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, J, & Jimerson, J. (2014). Teacher needs for data-related professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C, Jimerson, J. B, & Cho, V. (2012). Organizational considerations in establishing the data-informed district. school effectiveness and school improvement. American Journal of Education, 23(2), 159-178. doi:10.1086/505058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, A. S. (2009). “Our children’s burden”: A history of federal education policies that ask (now require) our public schools to solve societal inequality. In M. A. Rebell & J. R. Wolff (Eds.), NCLB at the crossroads: Re-examining the federal effort to close the achievement gap (pp. 1–42). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werler, T. (2015). Commodification of teacher professionalism. Policy Futures in Education, 14(1), 60–76. doi:10.1177/1478210315612646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werler, T., & Volckmar, N. (2015). Norway. In W. Hörner, H. Döbert, L. Reuter, & B. Von Kopp (Eds.), The education systems of Europe (pp. 603–619). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, J. L., Rosenberg, M. W., & Kearns, R. A. (2005). Narrative analysis as a strategy for understanding interview talk in geographic research. Area, 37(1), 89–99. doi:10.1111/area.2005.37.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, T. H., & Apple, M. W. (2003). Rethinking the education–state formation connection: The state, cultural struggles, and changing the school. In M. Apple (ed.), The state and the politics of knowledge (pp. 81–108). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar